Just suck off, midget. If I were addressing you, I'd have said dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ There is biology, and your pique.
Don't conflate the two.
criminal referrals, if any, happen AFTER the Committee finishes its investigation, of which these public hearings are a part.Neo » 06 Jun 2022, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ Funny they are going the media route rather than a justice department referral for a trial. They want to be able to present their case without opportunity for objections or introduction of contradictory evidence. They know they would lose in court if they had to be held to a reasonable doubt standard. This tax funded **** show will backfire.
****. They have no criminal referrals, that is why they are going this pathetic route.thelion » 06 Jun 2022, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑ criminal referrals, if any, happen AFTER the Committee finishes its investigation, of which these public hearings are a part.
Damn, Nancy....take your beating like a cowering sissy.Cannonpointer » 06 Jun 2022, 6:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Just suck off, midget. If I were addressing you, I'd have said dick sucker.
You mean, "accessing the record" and "demonstrating the Treason".Neo » 06 Jun 2022, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑ ****. They have no criminal referrals, that is why they are going this pathetic route.
Yeah, fruity - you've really put the smack down on us in this thread.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn, Nancy....take your beating like a cowering sissy.
It's what I do.Cannonpointer » 06 Jun 2022, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, fruity - you've really put the smack down on us in this thread.
The reason they are resorting to a public spectacle vs a court trial is???Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 8:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean, "accessing the record" and "demonstrating the Treason".
……quite harsh. ….. Certainly not a Bill of Rights advocate.
I'm a pragmatist.jefftec » 06 Jun 2022, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑ ……quite harsh. ….. Certainly not a Bill of Rights advocate.
…..mean…
Don't be ridiculous.Neo » 06 Jun 2022, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The reason they are resorting to a public spectacle vs a court trial is???
This **** would hurt them in court. They found NOTHING so they decided on this route. No need to meet any standards, no opportunity for any objections.
Is that right? You have a right to think what you want but,...." Grifter rubes should be euthanized."
No one ever suggested that these people are very bright..jefftec » 06 Jun 2022, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that right? You have a right to think what you want but,...." Grifter rubes should be euthanized."
.....well now, in your view they should be put to death for instigating the -insurrection that never really was- it's not like they came with firearms....
......makes no sense to me....
If they had proof of any criminal act they would have gone to court rather than the media.Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't be ridiculous.
Who would normalize a POTUS endangering the life of his own VP?
Or resisting all calls to put an end to the Insurrection of Imbeciles he engineered?
Only a craven fascist bootspittle.
They're doing both.Neo » 06 Jun 2022, 8:43 pm » wrote: ↑ If they had proof of any criminal act they would have gone to court rather than the media.
Harvey Korman was a comic genius. But this scene from Blazing Saddles is one of my favorites.
In the article, the judge orders Jensen to get 6 months of home confinement.........according to you, it would be thumbs down -dead-Blackvegetable » 06 Jun 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ No one ever suggested that these people are very bright..
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/13/trump-r ... pitol.html