ID-git!nuckinfutz » 07 Jun 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I charge for naked panning lessons! And, yes, you should take pictures!
@sooted up Cyndi
Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ If you have opposable thumbs, you are as evolved as you should be.
Of course.
Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course.
The fly in the ointment being, of course, that what you mean when you say human and what I mean when I respond might or might not align perfectly.
Seriously? You are my hero! All of our, really!
My rod and my staff comfort me!hee hee
To me, outliers do not live as more, or less, evolved. They are simply outliers. There has to be a mean and a median and an average, or we couldn't have the discipline of statistics - which would well and truly put pollsters out of work, setting back our evolution of kinetic ancestors here now..SJConspirator » 07 Jun 2022, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I do think that some are a little more advanced than others. But it’s hard to quantify… for example, some would say that Lance Armstrong is evolved physically beyond a average human. The gas exchange in his lungs is such that he absorbs as much oxygen from one breath of air as others do from 5, he is a genetic freak built for max cardio hence his champion cycling career.
others would say that he isn’t further evolved at all, because a chimp can learn to ride a bike. I guess it’s subjective
Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ To me, outliers do not live as more, or less, evolved. They are simply outliers. There has to be a mean and a median and an average, or we couldn't have the discipline of statistics - which would well and truly put pollsters out of work, setting back our evolution of kinetic ancestors here now..
If I grant that Lance Armstron is more evolved, I have to believe that Uncle Wheezy is less evolved, and - as he is on a nearby limb of my family tree - that I am less evolved. Being that I have thumbs, I say I am as evolved as any man, no matter where I keep 'em.
Now, you show me a fella who has had a full-blown thumbectomy, we can talk. That guy? NEVER gonna hitch a ride, NEVER gonn be a movie critic, NEVER gonna follow the various rules of thumb - he has been pushed backwrds on the evolutionary ladder. I won't have a fella like that in my camp. Cripples and retards put me right off my feed. Midgets, too. And they draw predators.
No sir. Won't have it.
A few coincidences and loads of money... Whatever the market will bear.Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ It's been going on for decades - always with dark money.
The Enquirer doesn't receive federal funds (that I know of).DeezerShoove » 07 Jun 2022, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑ A few coincidences and loads of money... Whatever the market will bear.
They are still using the program.Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑ The Enquirer doesn't receive federal funds (that I know of).
The CIA's remote viewing priogrms do.
That they DID fund it isnt even an argument. That they are still funding it is the only argument. If you wnat to believe they really stopped, go right ahead. I don't believe they have.
You are making me want to do really go there.Cannonpointer » 07 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it will not work except through headphones. What you will get is a taste - just a smidge. What the program delivers is a guided tour of the fourth dimension. You will meet your spirit guide, get instructions for your journey, and receive information about your nature and the nature of existence which will forever alter your view.
I have never known anyone who engaged in this discipline who did not emerge courgeous and sangune, .
I see people all the time. They are mutually evolving.omh » 06 Jun 2022, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ I have told you before, my mom. I grew up around that stuff and had to figure out how on my own, I did after she died.
AnnoyedLiberall » 08 Jun 2022, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ They are still using the program.
The CIA is not to be believed.
Maybe that's not how it happens but that's what the CIA would like to happen, that's why they funded it... but it still the same thing.. more or less... if the remote viewers are given a target then they have to consciously decide what they want to see... I don't think that can work, maybe remote viewing is possible but not on command...AnnoyedLiberall » 07 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ That's not exactly how it happens.
The remote viewers are given a 'target', and then asked to draw what they see.
It's not like they just close their eyes and see real time events taking place.
Apparently now it's called Project Farsight.Cannonpointer » 08 Jun 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ But skans INSISTS the CIA never prevaricates, for ny reason.
I mean, c'mon. If ya can't trust the CIA, who CAN ya trust?
I dont know if its CIA, or what.. but it really does exist. they have a team of them.. I havent been up on the latest.AnnoyedLiberall » 08 Jun 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently now it's called Project Farsight.
It was established in 2017
I am not even up on the old stuff. lolsooted up Cyndi » 08 Jun 2022, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I dont know if its CIA, or what.. but it really does exist. they have a team of them.. I havent been up on the latest.
ha ha ha.. well i'm not up on the new stuff