Not on commnd - so there are protocols. It doesn't work perfectly. But it works - through a glass darkly, but it works.Jantje_Smit » 08 Jun 2022, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe that's not how it happens but that's what the CIA would like to happen, that's why they funded it... but it still the same thing.. more or less... if the remote viewers are given a target then they have to consciously decide what they want to see... I don't think that can work, maybe remote viewing is possible but not on command...
Skeptical is fine. It's healthy to question things.Deezer Shoove » 08 Jun 2022, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ James Randi was called a "disinformationist" regarding remote viewing.
Is being a skeptic the same as being a liar these days?
Since I've never had an experience or ever seen someone actually do a remote viewing, I remain a skeptic.
It is more fun puzzling over the megaliths and wonder how the Ancient Aliens did that.
There are very old creations that cannot be explained at this point.
Seems that the remote viewer (living among us today) could easily debunk the skeptics.
Wonder why that hasn't happened? Show some unexplainable evidence.
It all seems like fish stories about the one that got away at this point.
...and yet you and CP and SJ instantly got your knickers in a knot because I mentioned . . .AnnoyedLiberall » 09 Jun 2022, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑ Skeptical is fine. It's healthy to question things.
I think what makes it hard to accept for some, is that they haven't had supernatural or paranormal experiences.
Also, it's not something we have the science for.
It's more of a faith thing.
AnnoyedLiberall » 06 Jun 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ Is anyone familiar with this project and Remote Viewing?
RV is something I have just started dabbling with.
I was doing it before I knew what it was called.
I watched a movie yesterday called Third Eye Spies.
I have never heard of this project or knew about any of this.
I would like to discuss it with people more educated than myself.
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑ ...and yet you and CP and SJ instantly got your knickers in a knot because I mentioned . . .
. . . some people can be better if they have a belief in God.
Oh my, I said it again.
Yup, it is. So what?FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ 'being better' is not a valid reason to decide to have faith in some religion. You should rather believe what you think is true. Otherwise religion is simply a fashion choice, and very **** shallow
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ Yup, it is. So what?
I don't respect your beliefs...
Here's why.
Watch for about a minute and a half starting at about 2:00 in...
https://youtu.be/6AjyopaiKqM
Not at all. I don't have to know them.
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all. I don't have to know them.
Isn't that what causes many of the frictions of the world?
Did you watch the vid?
You want to be humorless about this, I can see.FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ i watched about as much as i could stand. this guy is taller than his intellect.
but lol....you cannot articulate what i believe...but you are quite certain you dont respect it. huh.
Not any more... You have sucked the atmosphere out of the room.FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ if i was 3 feet tall and repeated my post would you see the humor?
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ Not any more... You have sucked the atmosphere out of the room.
I want my money back.
The emotional cost is dear. And very steep.
DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ The emotional cost is dear. And very steep.
Wounds that will eventually heal but the scars will always remind me of what we had...
Oh quit bitching... You love it.FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ dude. you forced me to watch a midget midwit talking about how Christianity is bigfoot. i think you owe me some emotional bucks. This is the sort of **** that makes me alcoholic.
Millions of Russians can't all be wrong.FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ i never drank before i saw how utterly **** the world is. Its a cope for me. Best i got.