Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm

Go buck one up, Spanner Lad.

Never had a spanner in my tool box.  Go ahead ask why.  I’ll answer.

Hank » 17 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm

Distance and a gun
But this has **** all with the easy access to schools.

Of course you said a gun.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm

They know that doesn't stop me....I'm not in Logistics.

ha ha ha ha ha ha. You re in semantics, hypothetical situation ethics manifested into laws that rule people cradle to grave regardless which generation they arrived in because life only actually evolvings now, not split into calendar averaging rotations, lunar phases seasonal shifts north and south hemispheres regardless am or pm side of planet revolving around the star of this solar system.east and west magnetic poles are bermuda triangle and devil's Triangle.

Magnetic north for this solar system is the star. southern magnetic pole is facing outside the solar system. Electromagnetic North is 90 degrees perpendicular to rotation of planet. As they exist by new moon and full moon passing between star and planet since the moon doesn't rotate itself. Just orbits.

Instinctive critical thinking is far more aware of everything than believing anything else is possible.

Phobophobia » 18 Jun 2022, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 7:17 am

 

Symbolism over substance, society's laws demanding everyone ignore which, what, where, when, who, how, nd why nothing stays same total sum evolved to this point in time mutually evolving here.

My brain keeps up with the kinetic compounding changes within and beyond my skin. Your mind only debates what else is possible in every arena of ideas like Academia, arts, economics, politics, religions, regardless vernacular tribalism, language barriers, geographical area, social justification by mob rule measuring everyone by consensus which side they took cradle to grave.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:37 am

Don't know.  It is not on the lists I gave you, You struck thru them.  

Take a look at this and tell me the difference:

Look very very carefully. 

Orignal M16 lower:


 
Orginal SP1 Lower:

@Blackvegetable  

Which is the on design for an AR 15?

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:03 am

@Blackvegetable  

Which is the on design for an AR 15?

What argument are you trying to make now?

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 12:19 pm

@Blackvegetable    this should help you out.  I'll add one more:

@Blackvegetable  
 

ScottMon » 08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm

The only way the parents of a Uvalde victim could identify their dead child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrk4hVTZANo

The right wing wants to have more Americans only ided by their shoes. 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:05 am

What argument are you trying to make now?

Your claim is there is on,ya one design for the AR 15.  Which of the three lowers is that one design?

Keep running.

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:07 am

Your claim is there is on,ya one design for the AR 15.  Which of the three lowers is that one design?

Keep running.

It's not my claim, Sheilagh. 

You have confirmed what the citations plainly stated.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:29 am

It's not my claim, Sheilagh. 

You have confirmed what the citations plainly stated.

No, my reference was to the Armalite Rifle 15/M16.  The citations do not confirm that. But to end the argument go tell me which lower is which.

@Blackvegetable  

@MAGAdreaming   help your new buddy out.  Which lower goes with the one design AR 15?


 
 

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:37 am

No, my reference was to the Armalite Rifle 15/M16.  The citations do not confirm that. But to end the argument go tell me which lower is which.

No, Reframy. 



Post your words.

The term "AR-15" is now most-commonly used to refer only to the civilian variants of the rifle which lack the fully automatic function.[17]




 

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:42 am

@Blackvegetable  

@MAGAdreaming   help your new buddy out.  Which lower goes with the one design AR 15?

Stop confusing yourself with that nonsense,  Sheilagh..


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

Stop confusing yourself with that nonsense,  Sheilagh..

Put an end to it.  Tell which lower goes with this one design you speak of.  Why are you afraid?  I know why.

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:45 am

Put an end to it.  Tell which lower goes with this one design you speak of.  Why are you afraid?  I know why.

The term "AR-15" is now most-commonly used to refer only to the civilian variants of the rifle which lack the fully automatic function.[17]


this was over before it started.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:48 am

The term "AR-15" is now most-commonly used to refer only to the civilian variants of the rifle which lack the fully automatic function.[17]

this was over before it started.

that’s fine.  But even going by that definition go ahead and tell me which lower belongs to which rifle.  

Hell, your definition defeats you.  Unless it has fully automatic, by the definition I posted, it is NOT an assault rifle.  

The right wing loves killing machines.

MAGAdreaming » 18 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

The right wing loves killing machines.

I accept your surrender.

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 10:57 am

that’s fine.  But even going by that definition go ahead and tell me which lower belongs to which rifle.  

Hell, your definition defeats you.  Unless it has fully automatic, by the definition I posted, it is NOT an assault rifle.

It's more than "fine".

It's dispositive, and settles the matter.

the civilian variants of the rifle which lack the fully automatic function

You have lost, again.