Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:31 am

It was designed for a weapon, the round is indifferent to the selection.

**** idiot

Well, there hundreds of rounds more defeating.  Hell, they are FMJ rounds.   

Google it.  Hollow points are a helluva lot more devastating.  You are speaking above your knowledge level.  And it shows,

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:31 am

It was designed for a weapon, the round is indifferent to the selection.

**** idiot

Remember when I posted this?  Prolly not.  You stuck thru it:

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired.

https://www.justsecurity.org/25200/dod- ... -conflict/

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:52 am

Remember when I posted this?  Prolly not.  You stuck thru it:

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired.

https://www.justsecurity.org/25200/dod- ... -conflict/

Irrelevant. 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:55 am

Irrelevant.

But I thought you really respected the words of people who have fired these FMJ intermediate rounds in combat?

And for the record the Ulvalde Shooter DID NOT use NATO rounds.  He used EXPANDING ROUNDS.  Rounds designed for HUNTING.

https://theintercept.com/2022/05/28/uva ... mmunition/

What else you got that I can knockdown?



 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:01 am

But I thought you really respected the words of people who have fired these FMJ intermediate rounds in combat?

And for the record the Ulvalde Shooter DID NOT use NATO rounds.  He used EXPANDING ROUNDS.  Rounds designed for HUNTING.

https://theintercept.com/2022/05/28/uva ... mmunition/

What else you got that I can knockdown?

It is irrelevant. 

Do you understand why?
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:46 am

Well, there hundreds of rounds more defeating. Hell, they are FMJ rounds.   

Google it.  Hollow points are a helluva lot more devastating.  You are speaking above your knowledge level.  And it shows,

You aren't even speaking English.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:06 am

It is irrelevant. 

Do you understand why?

Do tell.

  

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:08 am

You aren't even speaking English.

Run.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 10:55 am

Irrelevant. 

actual evolving is "irrelevant to any topic of maybe.". Reality is about possibilities becoming social fruition when everyone agrees to disagree about their mutual point of origin, being conceived to adapt occupying space now.

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:09 am

Do tell.

Because the system was designed BEFORE the complaints.

Do you understand?
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

Because the system was designed BEFORE the complaints.

Do you understand?

That makes no sense.

The SYSTEM used, as well as the ammo, was not part of whatever design you are yapping about.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:19 am

Because the system was designed BEFORE the complaints.

Do you understand?
 

you haven't yet.

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:21 am

That makes no sense.

The SYSTEM used, as well as the ammo, was not part of whatever design you are yapping about.


 

Simple.. if they are complaining about it, they must be firing the weapon.

which had to have been designed and manufactured. 


**** moron.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:30 am

Simple.. if they are complaining about it, they must be firing the weapon.

which had to have been designed and manufactured. 

**** moron.

You are still making no sense.  Who is “they”?  And what are “they” complaining about?  

The weapon was designed and manufactured by Daniel Defense for civilian use.  The round was not NATO 5.56x45.  Acknowledge that.

 
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:33 am

You are still making no sense.  Who is “they”?  And what are “they”?  

The weapon was designed and manufactured by Daniel Defense for civilian use.  The round was not NATO 5.56x45.  Acknowledge that.

You are still making no sense.  Who is “they”?  And what are “they”?  

Soldiers in combat suggested

Braindead piece of ****.

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:09 am

Run.

Well, there hundreds of rounds more defeating

try it in English 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:48 am

try it in English

Devastating is the word,

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:46 am

Braindead piece of ****.

But the ammo and the weapon are not used in combat.  As a matter of fact expanding rounds are illegal in war.

 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am

Devastating is the word,

Then you should have used it.

Still irrelevant. 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 11:50 am

Then you should have used it.

Still irrelevant.

Actually, you discussing NATO 5.56x45 and the weapons used in combat is not relevant.  Neither were used in the shooting.