Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm

You've acknowledged that they have been posted.

All this time and you had no idea AR-15 is a trademark?

Do you understand how trademarks work?

**** idiot.

And nobody else named their firearm AR 15.  Colt is the  sole company to so.

Waiting on those bullet points.
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm

@Blackvegetable  

You got your case in three bullet points yet?

1. Irrelevant. It is an M4 variant, as indicated by the model number. The M4 was designed for combat.

2. Irrelevant. Post the caliber.

3. Irrelevant. 
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm

And nobody else named their firearm AR 15.  Colt is the  sole company to so.

Waiting on those bullet points.

Are you aware that AR-15 is a trademark?

Not only does Daniel Defense pay a license to Colt to use it on its rifles, it pays to put in ON THEIR TOY GUNS.

under a license.

**** idiot.
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm

What does this sentence mean:

Despite the patents expiring, Colt retained the trademark of the AR-15 and is the sole manufacturer able to label their firearms as AR-15.

Without paying Colt to do so..

Because Colt owns the trademark.

**** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm

1. Irrelevant. It is an M4 variant, as indicated by the model number. The M4 was designed for combat.

2. Irrelevant. Post the caliber.

3. Irrelevant.

 Nah, it is DD design.  

2 is not a bullet statement.  It is a demand.  The caliber has been posted numerous times.  .  

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

Are you aware that AR-15 is a trademark?

Not only does Daniel Defense pay a license to Colt to use it on its rifles, it pays to put in ON THEIR TOY GUNS.

under a license.

**** idiot.

The DDM4 series does not have Colt Ar 15 or Ar 15.  You will have to show a pic of one branded in that matter.  Your argument is it is an M4 variant.  Why would they put AR 15 on it?  Duh.

Dude, your argument has quickly crumbled.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm

Without paying Colt to do so..

Because Colt owns the trademark.

**** moron.

Despite the patents expiring, Colt retained the trademark of the AR-15 and is the sole manufacturer able to label their firearms as AR-15.

that is pretty definitive.

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

Are you aware that AR-15 is a trademark?

Not only does Daniel Defense pay a license to Colt to use it on its rifles, it pays to put in ON THEIR TOY GUNS.

under a license.

**** idiot.

This weapon is not branded as an AR 15.  Colt is the sole manufacturer that can do that.

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

Are you aware that AR-15 is a trademark?

Not only does Daniel Defense pay a license to Colt to use it on its rifles, it pays to put in ON THEIR TOY GUNS.

under a license.

**** idiot.

This weapon is not branded Colt Ar 15 or Ar 15

https://danieldefense.com/ddm4-v7.html 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm

This weapon is not branded Colt Ar 15 or Ar 15

https://danieldefense.com/ddm4-v7.html

Irrelevant. 

• LOWER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Enhanced Flared Magazine Well and Rear Receiver QD Swivel Attachment Point. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized
• UPPER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Indexing Marks and M4 Feed Ramps. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized

• GAS SYSTEM: Pinned Low Profile Gas Block CNC Machined of 4140 hardened steel and Mil-Spec Heavy Phosphate Coating, Mid-length, Direct Impingement
• MUZZLE DEVICE: Daniel Defense Flash Suppressor, 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, Salt Bath Nitride Finished
• BOLT CARRIER GROUP: M16 Profile, Mil-Spec MP Tested, Chrome Lined, Properly Staked Gas Key

• RECEIVER EXTENSION: 6 Position Mil-Spec 7075-T6 Aluminum

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm

Irrelevant. 

• LOWER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Enhanced Flared Magazine Well and Rear Receiver QD Swivel Attachment Point. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized
• UPPER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Indexing Marks and M4 Feed Ramps. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized

• GAS SYSTEM: Pinned Low Profile Gas Block CNC Machined of 4140 hardened steel and Mil-Spec Heavy Phosphate Coating, Mid-length, Direct Impingement
• MUZZLE DEVICE: Daniel Defense Flash Suppressor, 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, Salt Bath Nitride Finished
• BOLT CARRIER GROUP: M16 Profile, Mil-Spec MP Tested, Chrome Lined, Properly Staked Gas Key

• RECEIVER EXTENSION: 6 Position Mil-Spec 7075-T6 Aluminum

So?  I know all that already.  

My iPad case is Mil Spec.

Your license argument crashed and burned,

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm

Irrelevant. 

• LOWER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Enhanced Flared Magazine Well and Rear Receiver QD Swivel Attachment Point. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized
• UPPER RECEIVER: Mil-Spec with Indexing Marks and M4 Feed Ramps. CNC Machined of 7075-T6 Aluminum, Type III Hard Coat Anodized

• GAS SYSTEM: Pinned Low Profile Gas Block CNC Machined of 4140 hardened steel and Mil-Spec Heavy Phosphate Coating, Mid-length, Direct Impingement
• MUZZLE DEVICE: Daniel Defense Flash Suppressor, 17-4 PH Stainless Steel, Salt Bath Nitride Finished
• BOLT CARRIER GROUP: M16 Profile, Mil-Spec MP Tested, Chrome Lined, Properly Staked Gas Key

• RECEIVER EXTENSION: 6 Position Mil-Spec 7075-T6 Aluminum

Mil-Spec is an abbreviated term that stands for "military specification." For a firearm to be Mil-Spec, every aspect has to meet criteria defined by the military to often include dimensions, materials, testing of parts, etc. A Mil-Spec part and/or small arm system is ultimately approved by a U.S. government inspector.

A Mil-Spec firearm and its components must be evaluated and certified by the government for it to be Mil-Spec. In the case of false advertising, I loathe gun manufacturers who apply the term to parts or firearms that mislead consumers for marketing purposes. It's easy to see that companies are not offering civilian-legal Mil-Spec ARs because the military's feature Mil-Spec select-fire automatic or burst trigger systems.

I see and hear a lot of gun experts label a company's basic trigger as Mil-Spec. Even some of my colleagues do it. What they are describing is a semiautomatic-only trigger assembly that is not in the military's system. There are several different makes and designs of these basic triggers, so it is unfair to generally describe a heavy or gritty trigger as simply being Mil-Spec. There's more to a Mil-Spec trigger assembly than a single disconnector.

To this day, I love working on ARs and creating clones of all types of modern-day small arms. Though I tend to go deep in the minutia of finding correct government-issued bolt carrier groups and accessories, all I ever end up with is a copy that's not Mil-Spec. The closest civilian-legal clones to a current-issue Mil-Spec AR are the Colt LE6920 starting at $999 (colt.com) and the new FN 15 Military Collector M4 and M16 models for $1,749 (fnamerica.com).
https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/w ... pec/248141
 

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm

Mil-Spec is an abbreviated term that stands for "military specification." For a firearm to be Mil-Spec, every aspect has to meet criteria defined by the military to often include dimensions, materials, testing of parts, etc. A Mil-Spec part and/or small arm system is ultimately approved by a U.S. government inspector.

A Mil-Spec firearm and its components must be evaluated and certified by the government for it to be Mil-Spec. In the case of false advertising, I loathe gun manufacturers who apply the term to parts or firearms that mislead consumers for marketing purposes. It's easy to see that companies are not offering civilian-legal Mil-Spec ARs because the military's feature Mil-Spec select-fire automatic or burst trigger systems.

I see and hear a lot of gun experts label a company's basic trigger as Mil-Spec. Even some of my colleagues do it. What they are describing is a semiautomatic-only trigger assembly that is not in the military's system. There are several different makes and designs of these basic triggers, so it is unfair to generally describe a heavy or gritty trigger as simply being Mil-Spec. There's more to a Mil-Spec trigger assembly than a single disconnector.

To this day, I love working on ARs and creating clones of all types of modern-day small arms. Though I tend to go deep in the minutia of finding correct government-issued bolt carrier groups and accessories, all I ever end up with is a copy that's not Mil-Spec. The closest civilian-legal clones to a current-issue Mil-Spec AR are the Colt LE6920 starting at $999 (colt.com) and the new FN 15 Military Collector M4 and M16 models for $1,749 (fnamerica.com).
https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/w ... pec/248141

Good googling..

https://danieldefense.com/government.html
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:20 pm

Good googling..

https://danieldefense.com/government.html

I posted that for you a long time ago.  so?

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:20 pm

Good googling..

https://danieldefense.com/government.html

But are they paying Colt?    

Admit you are wrong.

@Blackvegetable  

Still waiting for those three bullet points that make your case,  I knew you didn’t have the balls.  

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:30 pm

But are they paying Colt?    

Admit you are wrong.

Yes...they are paying Colt.

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:34 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Still waiting for those three bullet points that make your case,  I knew you didn’t have the balls.

Why do you keep saying this?

Are you back to insisting that I haven't already done so?

Huey » 26 Jun 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:29 pm

I posted that for you a long time ago.  so?

Holy ****, are you **** stupid.

The parts are military spec, BECAUSE D D MAKES THEM FOR....THE **** MILITARY!

You really are a dumb ****. 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Jun 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jun 2022, 3:39 pm

Why do you keep saying this?

Are you back to insisting that I haven't already done so?

Nope.  I told you I would post mine, which I did although my argument is quite clear, and I said you would have to list yours.  I knew you wouldn’t.  You kind of a pushy like that.

So far every argument you have tried has failed.  Have you posted a pic of a DDM4v7 with the branding of AR 15?  Keep running.  This is fun.