Liberal Forum

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:04 am

Meltdown!  Achieved.

The Armalite Rifle 15 designed by stoner was designed to be a battlefield assaults weapon

The Colt Sporter was designed to a weapon for Civilians.  Semi automatics at the time were not designed to be assaults weapons.  That would be dumb.  Plus, if it was designed to be an assault weapon it was have fallen under the NFA of 1934.

Well,the gun manufacturers themselves call AR style rifles assault rifles.
 My AR 15 is built to military specs.

   I have more examples of them being called assault rifles by other publications.
 All AR 15 style rifles are built on the Stoner design.
 
 
 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:15 am

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am

@Blackvegetable  do you know what this gun is used for?

@Huey

@Blackvegetable  and his Butt Buddy Tavy went nuts over this:


 
A M&P 15-22

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am

@Blackvegetable    no one is talking about AR 15s in that discussion.  We are talking about rounds and bullets.  

Acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  Which was the discussion.

Is there a context?

Seriously.....why do you even try this ******* ****?

The AR 15 and the 5.56×45mm flesh obliterating round go together like......uhhhhhh.....A and R.

Squatchman » 09 Jun 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:17 am

Well,the gun manufacturers themselves call AR style rifles assault rifles.
 My AR 15 is built to military specs.

Let Dwarf dwarfslpain that...

They could have called it - The Sporter & You

And sold 4 copies.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

@Blackvegetable  and his Butt Buddy Tavy went nuts over this:


 
A M&P 15-22

In the retelling you were wearing your battle tunic....with the campaign ribbons

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am

@Blackvegetable    no one is talking about AR 15s in that discussion.  We are talking about rounds and bullets.  

Acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  Which was the discussion.

Is there a context?

Seriously.....why do you even try this ******* ****?

The AR 15 and the 5.56×45mm flesh obliterating round go together like......uhhhhhh.....A and R.

 

That's nice.  We were discussing the components of a round.  Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  

What's your point?  Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds?  That is an important part of your argument.  

I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round.  You kept using Strike Thru.  

My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds

Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:21 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:18 am

@Blackvegetable  and his Butt Buddy Tavy went nuts over this:


 
A M&P 15-22

In the retelling you were wearing your battle tunic....with the campaign ribbons

 

It proves the point that your knowledge of weapons is based on appearance.  Not function.  THAT is a 22 caliber rifle.  So no, no one in the US military would be wearing a battle tunic and campaign ribbons while holding that weapon.  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:10 am

wow you got your *** handed to you again!
stay out of any threads involving guns.
you are clueless. This is not Russian Studies

Dwarf,

EXCLUSIVELY in the retelling. 

As always.

Read the citation. Catch up with everyone else.

I thought I was the dwarf.  My feelings are now hurt.   

@Pepperluciophobia  
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

That's nice.  We were discussing the components of a round.  Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  

What's your point?  Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds?  That is an important part of your argument.  

I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round.  You kept using Strike Thru.  

My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds

Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

Have you posted the rifle model used yet?

Why do you keep yapping?

Try to grasp the point.

The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.

If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.

Now post the model the kid in Texas used.

Squatchman » 09 Jun 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:17 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:04 am

Meltdown!  Achieved.

The Armalite Rifle 15 designed by stoner was designed to be a battlefield assaults weapon

The Colt Sporter was designed to a weapon for Civilians.  Semi automatics at the time were not designed to be assaults weapons.  That would be dumb.  Plus, if it was designed to be an assault weapon it was have fallen under the NFA of 1934.

Well,the gun manufacturers themselves call AR style rifles assault rifles.
 My AR 15 is built to military specs.

   I have more examples of them being called assault rifles by other publications.
 All AR 15 style rifles are built on the Stoner design.
 
 
 

 

I agree.  But there is one little itsey bitsey piece missing, isn't there?  That little thing that makes them battlefield assault rifles. 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:25 am

Hey NANCE it is a squirt gun! Shoots water!


 @Huey

Like your faith.....gotta get 'em while they're young.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:35 am

I agree.  But there is one little itsey bitsey piece missing, isn't there?  That little thing that makes them battlefield assault rifles.

Irrelevant to DESIGN...

They shaved off some bits, left out a hole..but it's the AR 15

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

That's nice.  We were discussing the components of a round.  Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  

What's your point?  Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds?  That is an important part of your argument.  

I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round.  You kept using Strike Thru.  

My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds

Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

Have you posted the rifle model used yet?

Why do you keep yapping?

Try to grasp the point.

The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.

If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.

Now post the model the kid in Texas used.

 

I have.  And you posted it a couple of times today.  Again, you show you don't know what you are talking about.  

As far as AR 15 rifle I am just gonna sit back and watch.

You can't tell us what rounds.  I posted a couple of examples of rounds that are just destructive, if not more. 



 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:36 am

Like your faith.....gotta get 'em while they're young.

Your faith since birth still directs your brain at old age to mnd hyperbole before accepting your actual time being alive now.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:32 am

It proves the point that your knowledge of weapons is based on appearance.  Not function.  THAT is a 22 caliber rifle.  So no, no one in the US military would be wearing a battle tunic and campaign ribbons while holding that weapon.

No, it doesn't.

Read the citation, and stop spouting off as if you had any idea.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am

I have.  And you posted it a couple of times today.  Again, you show you don't know what you are talking about.  

As far as AR 15 rifle I am just gonna sit back and watch.

You can't tell us what rounds.  I posted a couple of examples of rounds that are just destructive, if not more.

Just post it.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:35 am

I agree.  But there is one little itsey bitsey piece missing, isn't there?  That little thing that makes them battlefield assault rifles.

Irrelevant to DESIGN...

They shaved off some bits, left out a hole..but it's the AR 15

 

OVer time you argumement has evolved from "weapon designed for the battlefield" to it is an assault rifle.

They shave off the most important bits.  I believe you said detuned. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:38 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am

I have.  And you posted it a couple of times today.  Again, you show you don't know what you are talking about.  

As far as AR 15 rifle I am just gonna sit back and watch.

You can't tell us what rounds.  I posted a couple of examples of rounds that are just destructive, if not more.

Just post it.
 

 

Nope. I quoted you.  You have posted it twice.  I have answered questions from you this morning.  Post the rounds he used.  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:38 am

No, it doesn't.

Read the citation, and stop spouting off as if you had any idea.

You operate in character of a programmed mind that cannot image anything beyond what you learned by social consensus after birth watching science fiction and governed by spiritual fantasies intellect is immortal where ancestral results come and go from beyond mutually evolving here.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:41 am

Nope. I quoted you.  You have posted it twice.  I have answered questions from you this morning.  Post the rounds he used.

It's an Objective Fact you've chosen to labor.

What model rifle was used in the Uvalde shootings?

Just the model number