Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:22 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:16 am

Stipulate you will answer my question AFTER I answer yours.  I asked first and you reframed but I will play along if agree to the stipulation.  You are reframing my point.

Dwarf,

You were insisting we discuss rounds.

The rifle you finally identified is designed to fire a specific round by its manufacturer.

For which round is it designed?

 

Actually, I was in a discussion concerning what a bullet is.  You made an *** of yourself and reframed.  

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:44 am

@Huey  all of my ARs shoot “bigger” ammo than 223/556
Mine shoot 9mm, 7.62x39, and 7.62x51

 

BV is a google genius. He doesn't understand that the destruction a bullet makes on the body is a product of the rounds design. 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am

Actually, I was in a discussion concerning what a bullet is.  You made an *** of yourself and reframed.

Are these your words?

. Plus, this is a discussion of rounds.  Acknowledge that

Now post the round for which the rifle used in the Uvalde shooting is designed.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am

BV is a google genius. He doesn't understand that the destruction a bullet makes on the body is a product of the rounds design.

That is exactly the point I've been making, stupid ****. 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am

Try to stay on topic, you morons were shedding tears over the green converse. You fell for the political theater.

That being the identity of your master, Ruby.

F'n A...
 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:34 am

He used 5.56 rounds is there a point?

That's not exactly how the manufacturer describes it, is it, Cheddy..

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:51 am

That being the identity of your master, Ruby.

F'n A...

I heard that you considered going on a date with a tranny. I didn't know that you were a homo. 

That makes so much sense now.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am

Sure you are.  The same round fired from that weapon has the same affect as on shot from a DDM4.  If the same caliber.  You don't now what you are talking about.

PS.  Stoner did not design that weapon.

Dwarf,

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..
 

Vegas » 09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am

I heard that you considered going on a date with a tranny. I didn't know that you were a homo. 

That makes so much sense now.

You hear a lot of stupid ****.

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:54 am

You hear a lot of stupid ****.

Are you denying it? 

Vegas » 09 Jun 2022, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:56 am

Are you denying it?

Of course.

I have no such curiosity.

I'm a highly credentialed heterosexual. 


Acknowledge that you have, once again, been answered. 
 

Squatchman » 08 Jun 2022, 11:29 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 11:29 pm

  Have you ever fired an AR 15?
 Have you seen the footage of Kyle Rittenhouse burst the bicep of that dude with just M193 FMJs loaded in his AR?

I have internet seen dozens of AR15 fatalities - not one required shoe identifiction. 

You're such a frauding little gun grabbing ***, pretending to be a gun owner while defending a flagrantly preposterous narrative intended to demonize and eventully cause to be outlawed a gun you pretend you support my right to own. 

You smarmy little dick sucker. Your punishment is living with yourself, fruitcake. 

Got a message from your tortured soul for ya: "Please ungay, I wanna come home."
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am

Actually, I was in a discussion concerning what a bullet is.  You made an *** of yourself and reframed.

Are these your words?

. Plus, this is a discussion of rounds.  Acknowledge that

Now post the round for which the rifle used in the Uvalde shooting is designed.

Take a look at the all the names on the posts below and tell me whose words they are.  As I said, the disussion I was having involved what a bullet is.  

This is your last answer.

The Uvalde shooter could have used a 223 or a 556.  Now, answer my question which is were they FMJ or some type of defense found.  ANd make your point. 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:12 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:39 am

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:37 am

 

LMAO!  I have no clue what you are getting at.  You are now being cryptic like @Blackvegetable  

First, I'll answer.  Technically, the bullet is what comes out of the shell.  They would not be able to shoot that.  

Now, make your point.

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:44 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:39 am

 

 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:44 am

 

I am not melting down. I am literally LMFAO.  

What I posted is correct.  The basic components of ammunition are the case, primer, powder, and projectile.

• Case: The container that holds all the other ammunition components together. It's usually made of brass, steel, or copper.
• Primer: An explosive chemical compound that ignites the gunpowder when struck by a firing pin. Primer may be placed either in the rim of the case (rimfire) or in the center of the base of the case (centerfire).
• Gunpowder: A chemical mixture that burns rapidly and converts to an expanding gas when ignited.
• Projectile: The object expelled from the barrel. A bullet is a projectile, usually containing lead, fired through a handgun barrel.

https://www.handgunsafetycourse.com/han ... 700077856/

Nod.

@Blackvegetable    no one is talking about AR 15s in that discussion.  We are talking about rounds and bullets.  

Acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  Which was the discussion.

 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:45 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:42 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:41 am

Nope. I quoted you.  You have posted it twice.  I have answered questions from you this morning.  Post the rounds he used.

It's an Objective Fact you've chosen to labor.

What model rifle was used in the Uvalde shootings?

Just the model number

You have posted it twice.  But, I will do it again.  

Plus, this is a discussion of rounds.  Acknowledge that. 

This is the model:

Daniel Defense DDM4 Rifle

 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:43 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:22 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:16 am

 

Dwarf,

You were insisting we discuss rounds.

The rifle you finally identified is designed to fire a specific round by its manufacturer.

For which round is it designed?

Actually, I was in a discussion concerning what a bullet is.  You made an *** of yourself and reframed.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:52 am

That's not exactly how the manufacturer describes it, is it, Cheddy..

I don't know, but I do know what was released by law enforcement. He purchased 2 rifles and 375 rounds of 5.56 ammo.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:58 am

Of course.

I have no such curiosity.

I'm a highly credentialed heterosexual. 

Acknowledge that you have, once again, been answered.

This is the first time that you answered my direct question the first time around.  Now all you need to do is make it habit. 

And why the **** do you have to say "highly credentialed?" You just sound stupid when you talk like that. 

@Huey  He is denying that he considered going on a date with a tranny. Is there a quote about it?

ScottMon » 08 Jun 2022, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 3:27 pm

The gun he used was designed to penetrate flesh and bone.

People should only be allowed to have rubber band guns, fruity. 

They don't "penetrate flesh and bone" - but they sting, by gum. Teach an intruder a darned good lesson, by gum. 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:52 am

That's not exactly how the manufacturer describes it, is it, Cheddy..

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:49 am

Are these your words?

Now post the round for which the rifle used in the Uvalde shooting is designed.

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:23 am

For whom did you cast two enthusiastic votes?

No questions, dick sucker.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am

Sure you are.  The same round fired from that weapon has the same affect as on shot from a DDM4.  If the same caliber.  You don't now what you are talking about.

PS.  Stoner did not design that weapon.

Dwarf,

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..
 

 

DDM4 rifles are available in three main calibers: 5.56mm NATO, . 300 AAC Blackout, and 6.8mm SPC. While there are pros and cons for each of these calibers, and reasons you may be attracted to one over the other, the majority of DDM4 rifles are chambered in 5.56mm.

https://danieldefense.com/wire/firearm-features

The 5.56 will also fire 223:

We only recommend the use of factory loaded, brass cased ammunition. We urge all of our customers to stay away from steel cased ammo and reloads. In regards to our 5.56 carbines, all are chambered and function tested with 5.56 ammunition. It is safe to shoot .223 Rem but not all will perform on the same level. Find some ammo that works, and stick with it.

https://danieldefense.com/faq

Ok, now make your point.