Liberal Forum

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

Maybe it is you trying to avoid the embarrassment.  My recall is fine.

No, your recall really sucks..

We had another fresh example a few hours ago, but you've probably forgotten. 
 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm

The most alarming part of all these posts is the fact @Blackvegetable  has stated he wanted to kill people that violated his air space maskless.

How? kick them with his girly sneakers?  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

DDM4 rifles are available in three main calibers: 5.56mm NATO, . 300 AAC Blackout, and 6.8mm SPC. While there are pros and cons for each of these calibers, and reasons you may be attracted to one over the other, the majority of DDM4 rifles are chambered in 5.56mm.

https://danieldefense.com/wire/firearm-features

The 5.56 will also fire 223:

We only recommend the use of factory loaded, brass cased ammunition. We urge all of our customers to stay away from steel cased ammo and reloads. In regards to our 5.56 carbines, all are chambered and function tested with 5.56 ammunition. It is safe to shoot .223 Rem but not all will perform on the same level. Find some ammo that works, and stick with it.

https://danieldefense.com/faq

Ok, now make your point.

Enough dancy dancy..

When you arrive at the (FRESHLY HEAVILY REDESIGNED) "Home Defense" (very recently nee "AR15 Rifles") page at the manufacturer's website, it specifies THIS round

5.56mm NATO


With which sporting/educational organization are the letters N, A, T, O associated?

By most sentients.




 

 

You are out of questions until you make your point and answer mine. 

This is what you demanded:

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..

I posted what the manufacture says on the webpage.  So, you tell me which was used.  It was probably 5.56 or 223.  You have yet to tell usif it was FMJ or some type of specialty defense round.  There will be no NATO designation for that.    So start elaborating. 
 

Vegas » 09 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:04 pm

It must have been the other Blackvegetable that started that thread.  Since you can't define what a woman is you don't really know.

Maybe it was deleted during the great purge. 

He lies incessantly. I am convinced that it is true.

 

It was.  I have a post where I mentioned it to him that survived and he did not deny it. As a matter of fact it was one of your threads. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:13 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:06 pm

Maybe it is you trying to avoid the embarrassment.  My recall is fine.

No, your recall really sucks..

We had another fresh example a few hours ago, but you've probably forgotten. 
 

 

My recall is good on this.  You know what you posted.  

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

It was.  I have a post where I mentioned it to him that survived and he did not deny it. As a matter of fact it was one of your threads.

Do you know where I can find it?

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

My recall is good on this.  You know what you posted.

I do.

I always do.

You? Not so much.
 

Vegas » 09 Jun 2022, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:24 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

It was.  I have a post where I mentioned it to him that survived and he did not deny it. As a matter of fact it was one of your threads.

Do you know where I can find it?

 

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=58403&p=1733752&hil ... y#p1733752

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm

You are out of questions until you make your point and answer mine. 

This is what you demanded:

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..

I posted what the manufacture says on the webpage.  So, you tell me which was used.  It was probably 5.56 or 223.  You have yet to tell usif it was FMJ or some type of specialty defense round.  There will be no NATO designation for that.    So start elaborating.

the point has been made.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm

My recall is good on this.  You know what you posted.

I do.

I always do.

You? Not so much.
 

 

You have a point and a question to answer.  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm

Enough dancy dancy..

When you arrive at the (FRESHLY HEAVILY REDESIGNED) "Home Defense" (very recently nee "AR15 Rifles") page at the manufacturer's website, it specifies THIS round

5.56mm NATO

With which sporting/educational organization are the letters N, A, T, O associated?

By most sentients.

You should refrain from discussing weapons or ammo
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm

You are out of questions until you make your point and answer mine. 

This is what you demanded:

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..

I posted what the manufacture says on the webpage.  So, you tell me which was used.  It was probably 5.56 or 223.  You have yet to tell usif it was FMJ or some type of specialty defense round.  There will be no NATO designation for that.    So start elaborating.

the point has been made.
 

 

You can't make a point until you tell us which round was used, to include the caliber.  You may start running now. 

You point all along is because stoner designed a specific round for that rifle it made the round even deadlier.  That is STOOPID.  If I am wrong state your point. 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm

The most alarming part of all these posts is the fact @Blackvegetable  has stated he wanted to kill people that violated his air space maskless.

Let the Legend precede me.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:29 pm

You can't make a point until you tell us which round was used, to include the caliber.  You may start running now. 

You point all along is because stoner designed a specific round for that rifle it made the round even deadlier.  That is STOOPID.  If I am wrong state your point.

I'm good.

It doesn't matter if you understand it.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=58403&p=1733752&hil ... y#p1733752

Yep, he didn't deny it. 

@Blackvegetable  , you never denied it after Huey brought it up. Given that you are a chronic liar, there is little doubt that it is true. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:31 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:29 pm

You can't make a point until you tell us which round was used, to include the caliber.  You may start running now. 

You point all along is because stoner designed a specific round for that rifle it made the round even deadlier.  That is STOOPID.  If I am wrong state your point.

I'm good.

It doesn't matter if you understand it.
 

 

All you have done is ask questions and not answer any.  You have not made a clear cut point.  My description of your point stands.

It shows you have no understanding of ammo or firearms.  If you understood you would be calling for a ban on certain ammo as opposed to a certain gun.  You try and get an AR ban and guess what?  If successful everyone buy another rifle that does not look mean and scary that fires 5.56 or 223.  

You idiots think thru you decsions.

Vegas » 09 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=58403&p=173 ... y#p1733752

Yep, he didn't deny it. 

@Blackvegetable  , you never denied it after Huey brought it up. Given that you are a chronic liar, there is little doubt that it is true. 

 

That is not the only time I have brought it up.  I guess you are saying you never, ever considered a date with a tranny.  

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:34 pm

That is not the only time I have brought it up.  I guess you are saying you never, ever considered a date with a tranny.

I think you are right about why he answered my question so quickly. My question triggered one of his many insecurities. 

He never answers my questions the first time around. Like ever. 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm

Pepperluciophobia » 08 Jun 2022, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 6:10 pm

@Misty  
The bullet penetrates the body, not the rifle.

Don't rely on BV for much.. He doesn't know the difference between a gun part and a gun holster.

It is the round designed for that rifle....and its purpose.

 

Then you should be whining to ban that specific round.  Not the rifle. Because as it has been demonstrated that round can be used in many different rifles.  

Game. Set. Match. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:11 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

DDM4 rifles are available in three main calibers: 5.56mm NATO, . 300 AAC Blackout, and 6.8mm SPC. While there are pros and cons for each of these calibers, and reasons you may be attracted to one over the other, the majority of DDM4 rifles are chambered in 5.56mm.

https://danieldefense.com/wire/firearm-features

The 5.56 will also fire 223:

We only recommend the use of factory loaded, brass cased ammunition. We urge all of our customers to stay away from steel cased ammo and reloads. In regards to our 5.56 carbines, all are chambered and function tested with 5.56 ammunition. It is safe to shoot .223 Rem but not all will perform on the same level. Find some ammo that works, and stick with it.

https://danieldefense.com/faq

Ok, now make your point.

Enough dancy dancy..

When you arrive at the (FRESHLY HEAVILY REDESIGNED) "Home Defense" (very recently nee "AR15 Rifles") page at the manufacturer's website, it specifies THIS round

5.56mm NATO


With which sporting/educational organization are the letters N, A, T, O associated?

By most sentients.




 

 

Let's finish off your NATO reference.  They are designated NATO rounds because they are designed for military use.  They are nothing more than FMJ rounds.  They are not hollow points or any specialty PD rounds.  Reason being for years expandng bullets were considered illegal by Geneva Convention Standards, including the time when Stoner created this round.  Here is what soldiers say about this allegedly devastating round:

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired. 

That article is actually taking the line that expandable bullets (hollow points, etc) are allowed in combat and DOD has changed their rules:

https://www.justsecurity.org/25200/dod- ... -conflict/

While hollow points are commonly used by police and civilians, they are banned in international warfare under the 1899 Hague Convention's early laws of war that the United States has followed even though the U.S. government never ratified the agreement.

https://www.thetrace.org/2015/07/hollow ... n-us-army/

The point being is the round that Stoner created was not really as effective and destructive as you claim.  Let's talk ammo.