Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:35 pm

Shut up, Cheddy.

Facts are facts, stupid.
 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm

Facts are facts, stupid.

 
good. Then you can shut the **** up now.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

That's nice.  We were discussing the components of a round.  Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  

What's your point?  Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds?  That is an important part of your argument.  

I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round.  You kept using Strike Thru.  

My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds

Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

Have you posted the rifle model used yet?

Why do you keep yapping?

Try to grasp the point.

The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.

If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.

Now post the model the kid in Texas used.

 

Again, your issue is with the round, not the weapon.  

One correction.  The semi auto version is was not designed to be an assault weapon. 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm

So make your point.  I posted the first post where you mentioned rounds designed for the Armalite Rifle 15.  So there is no lie.  I addressed your comments.

I'll look for more.  But, it would be nice for once if you clearly state your position.

state his position? All he does is move the goal posts

That is why I am reposting his words on the ammo issue.  
 
 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm

state his position? All he does is move the goal posts

Give him the Reacharound, Sailor..

He needs it.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm

That is why I am reposting his words on the ammo issue.

The issue you've lost?

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:53 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:30 am

Sure you are.  The same round fired from that weapon has the same affect as on shot from a DDM4.  If the same caliber.  You don't now what you are talking about.

PS.  Stoner did not design that weapon.

Dwarf,

Before elaborating, post what the manufacturer says on its webpage..
 


 

DDM4 rifles are available in three main calibers: 5.56mm NATO, . 300 AAC Blackout, and 6.8mm SPC. While there are pros and cons for each of these calibers, and reasons you may be attracted to one over the other, the majority of DDM4 rifles are chambered in 5.56mm.

https://danieldefense.com/wire/firearm-features

The 5.56 will also fire 223:

We only recommend the use of factory loaded, brass cased ammunition. We urge all of our customers to stay away from steel cased ammo and reloads. In regards to our 5.56 carbines, all are chambered and function tested with 5.56 ammunition. It is safe to shoot .223 Rem but not all will perform on the same level. Find some ammo that works, and stick with it.

https://danieldefense.com/faq

Ok, now make your point. 

 

 

Just want to remind you of this @Blackvegetable.


I notice you mentioned 223.  According to the webpage you requested the DDM4 will fire a 223.  Which you recommended earlier.  Meaning once again your issue is not with the rifle, but with the AMMO.  

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm

Again, your issue is with the round, not the weapon.  

One correction.  The semi auto version is was not designed to be an assault weapon.

you're a **** idiot.

The round was designed to accommodate the purpose of the design of the rifle.

That purpose is to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

It has nothing to do with any sport.

Acknowledge that you understand the point.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:58 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm

That is why I am reposting his words on the ammo issue.

The issue you've lost?

 

You won't define what you are talking about.  I just went back and reposted many of your posts on the ammo issue.  You lost. 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm

those are AR 15 styled rifles.

shut your ignorant mouth.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm

You won't define what you are talking about.  I just went back and reposted many of your posts on the ammo issue.  You lost.

Don't bother with the ****, I don't read it.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm

Again, your issue is with the round, not the weapon.  
 

One correction.  The semi auto version is was not designed to be an assault weapon.

you're a **** idiot.

The round was designed to accommodate the purpose of the design of the rifle.

That purpose is to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

It has nothing to do with any sport.

Acknowledge that you understand the point.
 

 

The round was designed to accommodate the purpose of the design of the rifle.

No argument.  And now that round is used in multiple rifles that are not mean and scary looking.  DDM4, not the Armalite Rifle 15, is the weapon in question.  The DDM4, according to the manufacturer web page YOU requested and refuse to acknowledge, also fires 223.  The ammo you recommended for hunting with AR 15.  The Colt AR 15 was still a one trigger pull, one shot weapon.  

That purpose is to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

Many firearms and rounds are capable of that.  32 dead and 27 wounded at VA Tech with two semi automatic handguns.  

It has nothing to do with any sport.

My Henry 45 long Colt was designed to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

Acknowledge that you understand the point.

A 556 shot from a weapon that looks like a standard hunting rifle is no less effective that one shot from a DDM4.  As I have demonstrated using your own posts. 

Acknowledge you understand the point. 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm

You won't define what you are talking about.  I just went back and reposted many of your posts on the ammo issue.  You lost.

Don't bother with the ****, I don't read it.

 

That why I have a blast when you post on this topic.  You know nothing about it. Your line about a 223 for hunting purposes shows how ignorant you are and that your real concern is with the ammo.  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:17 pm

We can stop right there.

When relentlessness and ruthlessness collide. We the people dictate who any individual is socially here.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm

No argument.  And now that round is used in multiple rifles that are not mean and scary looking.  DDM4, not the Armalite Rifle 15, is the weapon in question.  The DDM4, according to the manufacturer web page YOU requested and refuse to acknowledge, also fires 223.  The ammo you recommended for hunting with AR 15.  The Colt AR 15 was still a one trigger pull, one shot weapon.  

Many firearms and rounds are capable of that.  32 dead and 27 wounded at VA Tech with two semi automatic handguns.  

My Henry 45 long Colt was designed to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

A 556 shot from a weapon that looks like a standard hunting rifle is no less effective that one shot from a DDM4.  As I have demonstrated using your own posts. 

Acknowledge you understand the point.

For what purpose was the AR 15 designed?

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm

The Texas shooter didn't use an AR-15.

correct he used an AR 15 styled rifle

Colt retained the trademark of the AR-15 and is the sole manufacturer able to label their firearms as AR-15

@Huey  
@Blackvegetable  

 

WE know that, and @Cedar   knows that, but someone else does not. 

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

News for the gun ignorant!
If it is not manufactured by colt it is not an AR-15

Colt retained the trademark of the AR-15 and is the sole manufacturer able to label their firearms as AR-15

Shut the **** up.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

For what purpose was the AR 15 designed?

To sell them. what is any product put on the market for. make society work for everyone, not just those pretending to be intellectually above mutually evolving now.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

WE know that, and @Cedar   knows that, but someone else does not.

When I saw the title of the thread.. I thought it was bv's right toe sneaker! I'm gone Hooey!   

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm

No argument.  And now that round is used in multiple rifles that are not mean and scary looking.  DDM4, not the Armalite Rifle 15, is the weapon in question.  The DDM4, according to the manufacturer web page YOU requested and refuse to acknowledge, also fires 223.  The ammo you recommended for hunting with AR 15.  The Colt AR 15 was still a one trigger pull, one shot weapon.  

Many firearms and rounds are capable of that.  32 dead and 27 wounded at VA Tech with two semi automatic handguns.  

My Henry 45 long Colt was designed to kill or disable as many breathing things as possible within a determined radius.

A 556 shot from a weapon that looks like a standard hunting rifle is no less effective that one shot from a DDM4.  As I have demonstrated using your own posts. 

Acknowledge you understand the point.

For what purpose was the AR 15 designed?

 

We are talking about the semi automatic DDM4. In regards to that your question does not apply.  

Specify if you are talking about the automatic Armalite Rifle 15, the Colt C601, M 16 (which are essentially the same weapon OR the semi automatic Colt AR 15 which was designed for civilians and police?