Kill yourself.Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ bitch you are being pimp slapped all over this thread
Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ We are talking about the semi automatic DDM4. In regards to that your question does not apply.
Specify if you are talking about the automatic Armalite Rifle 15, the Colt C601, M 16 (which are essentially the same weapon OR the semi automatic Colt AR 15 which was designed for civilians and police?
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑Kill yourself.Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ bitch you are being pimp slapped all over this thread
An AR-15-style rifle is any lightweight semi-automatic rifle based on the Colt AR-15 design. The original ArmaLite AR-15 is a scaled-down derivative of Eugene Stoner's ArmaLite AR-10 design. The then Fairchild Engine and Airplane Corporation division ArmaLite sold the patent and trademarks to Colt's Manufacturing Company in 1959. After most of Colt's patents for the Colt AR-15 expired in 1977, many firearm manufacturers began to produce copies of the Colt AR-15 under various names
Grab a loaded gun, suck the barrel.
No, already debunked.Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The DDM4 is not a copy of a Colt AR 15 and is the weapon we are discussing. Check the name..
Why are they allowed to label it such?
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ We are talking about the semi automatic DDM4. In regards to that your question does not apply.
Specify if you are talking about the automatic Armalite Rifle 15, the Colt C601, M 16 (which are essentially the same weapon OR the semi automatic Colt AR 15 which was designed for civilians and police?
**** idiot
Specify if you are talking about the automatic Armalite Rifle 15, the Colt C601, M 16 (which are essentially the same weapon OR the semi automatic Colt AR 15 which was designed for civilians and police?
Why do you persist in asserting?Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The weapon is not based on the Stoner Weapon.
Now answer that Question.
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑No, already debunked.Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The DDM4 is not a copy of a Colt AR 15 and is the weapon we are discussing. Check the name..
In the retelling you are vaguely male.Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Your *** is getting kicked all over this thread.
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑Why do you persist in asserting?Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The weapon is not based on the Stoner Weapon.
Now answer that Question.
The citations have covered this, even if you don't understand them.
That's why I wouldn't buy a weapon from a manufacturer that doesn't know the difference, they're wrong as are you.
Dwarf,Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Your citations apply to the Armalite RIfle 15, the Colt 601, and the M16 as well as the Semi Automatic Colt AR 15.
The discussion is over the DDM4 and the ammunition it uses.
In your social mind, your brain is lost speculating which reality is better.
Share that with someone who gives a ****.Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ That's why I wouldn't buy a weapon from a manufacturer that doesn't know the difference, they're wrong as are you.
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑Dwarf,Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Your citations apply to the Armalite RIfle 15, the Colt 601, and the M16 as well as the Semi Automatic Colt AR 15.
The discussion is over the DDM4 and the ammunition it uses.
Stop presuming.
The citations have spoken.
You are laboring a non-distinction.
The gunman bought 375 rounds of 5.56-caliber ammunition on May 18.
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/25 ... n-legally/
You may shut the **** up now.
There is no need to qualify the facts with your stream of ****.Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ If you had read my posts instead of weaponizing strike thru you would have read where 5.56 is a common round for many different weapons.
Like the DDM4 which is not a copy of the Colt AR 15. Again, you prove your issue is with the ammunition, not the delivery tool. Wait for it.
Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑Have you posted the rifle model used yet?Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ That's nice. We were discussing the components of a round. Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.
What's your point? Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds? That is an important part of your argument.
I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round. You kept using Strike Thru.
My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.
My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds
Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.
Why do you keep yapping?
Try to grasp the point.
The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.
If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.
Now post the model the kid in Texas used.
Those are your words. The DDM4, off the shelf, will fire a .223 as well as .556. Your issue is with the ammo, not the firearm.If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.
What ammo did the shooter use?Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Those are your words. The DDM4, off the shelf, will fire a .223 as well as .556. Your issue is with the ammo, not the firearm.