Liberal Forum

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 3:39 pm

You can't answer without destroying your entire argument. Your concession is duly noted.

Cheddy, please.

I bet you have no clue what was at issue.
 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm

It's pertinent to the discussion on this thread, it's a simple yes or no question should hunting rifles be banned?
 

You know what you did in your post is psychological class warfare separating people by ideology on intellectual planes beyond mutually evolving here, correct? if not, now you know.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm

Neither is banning a scary looking rifle.

So your argument is that this gun is no more dangerous than other guns?
 

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:18 pm

So your argument is that this gun is no more dangerous than other guns?
 

damn, a crack in a closed mind social narrative. Oh wait, the question was syllogistic. you stay locked into a social narrative one sided point of view.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 2:40 pm

You lost.

Again.

Nah.  You should try reading the info provided.  You lost big time but are smart enough to realize it.

And some of these post will come back and bite you in the ***

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 3:24 pm

It's the look that sells it.

More proof you opinion is based on looks as opposed to function.

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:18 pm

So your argument is that this gun is no more dangerous than other guns?

For the most part, yes.  32 killed and 17 Wounded at VA Tech.

With hand guns.

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm

It's pertinent to the discussion on this thread, it's a simple yes or no question should hunting rifles be banned?

@Blackvegetable  answer the question.

You have already posted that it would be ok to hunt with an what you call an AR 15 as long as it is 223.

 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:56 pm

For the most part, yes.  32 killed and 17 Wounded at VA Tech.

With hand guns.

Ok, So that is a valid point.  What about red flag laws?
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:58 pm

@Blackvegetable  answer the question.

You have already posted that it would be ok to hunt with an what you call an AR 15 as long as it is 223.

No, dwarf....I didn't. 

And if you want it, start a **** thread.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm

More proof you opinion is based on looks as opposed to function.

Yes..

It sells to people with severe issues.

And the cherry on top is that it works as designed.


 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm

Nah.  You should try reading the info provided. You lost big time but are smart enough to realize it.

And some of these post will come back and bite you in the ***

Dwarf,

Did you read my CITATION?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:04 pm

Dwarf,

Did you read my CITATION?

Which one?  Please specify.  I know you haven’t read much of anything I posted.  You struck thru them.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm

Yes..

It sells to people with severe issues.

And the cherry on top is that it works as designed.

Then I have been correct all along.  You lose:0
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:02 pm

No, dwarf....I didn't. 

And if you want it, start a **** thread.

You certainly did.  

Next, all those S&W rifles I posted with a link are fine.  NONE of them bear the name AR 15.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am

Have you posted the rifle model used yet?

Why do you keep yapping?

Try to grasp the point.

The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.

If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.

Now post the model the kid in Texas used.

There you go.  Again.

@Blackvegetable  

Peopke do use 556 for hunting,  you need knowledge on this topic

Some people use it for antelope and deer, but many consider it not powerful enough. The 5.56 mm round is a great hunting round for mid sized game like smaller hogs and coyotes. It not your go to rabbit cartridge and it's a bit underwhelming as a deer cartridge but it certainly has its place in the world

Pepperluciophobia » 09 Jun 2022, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:21 pm

He is in for a hard landing....

He claims the 556 is this almighty powerful round.  Hell, many say it is “underwhelming” for deer,

He is not very smart.

@Blackvegetable  

More about hunting with the 556:

223/5.56 as a deer hunting caliber. While shots should still be limited to ranges maxing out at around 100 yards (the small bullet just sheds too much energy beyond that range), hunters can now feel confident in taking their rifles afield during deer season.Nov 3, 2016

https://www.realtree.com › why-you...Why You Should Use an AR-15 as a Deer Rifle | Realtree Camo
223/5.56 is NOT a legal big game hunting caliber, but 6.5 Grendel, 243 WSSM, etc. would be a legal caliber to hunt big game. There are similar restrictions in other states like Connecticut, Iowa, Virginia, New Jersey, Washington, and West Virginia, etc.May 21, 2018

https://www.brentonusa.com › is-it-l...Is it Legal to Hunt with an AR-15? | Brenton USA
Do you know why it is not legal to hunt BIG game with a 556?  Because it is not powerful enough. States make it illegal to hunt with because it may not injure the animal.

So much got your ammo theory,
 
 
 

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm

Ok, So that is a valid point.  What about red flag laws?
 

Doing something that doesn't change the corruption going forward, doesn't end the corruption going forward. Red flag laws are a hoax to gain more social control over those allowing to be controlled by semantics again.