Liberal Forum

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:33 pm

@Blackvegetable  

More about hunting with the 556:

223/5.56 as a deer hunting caliber. While shots should still be limited to ranges maxing out at around 100 yards (the small bullet just sheds too much energy beyond that range), hunters can now feel confident in taking their rifles afield during deer season.Nov 3, 2016

https://www.realtree.com › why-you...Why You Should Use an AR-15 as a Deer Rifle | Realtree Camo
223/5.56 is NOT a legal big game hunting caliber, but 6.5 Grendel, 243 WSSM, etc. would be a legal caliber to hunt big game. There are similar restrictions in other states like Connecticut, Iowa, Virginia, New Jersey, Washington, and West Virginia, etc.May 21, 2018

https://www.brentonusa.com › is-it-l...Is it Legal to Hunt with an AR-15? | Brenton USA
Do you know why it is not legal to hunt BIG game with a 556?  Because it is not powerful enough. States make it illegal to hunt with because it may not injure the animal.

So much got your ammo theory,

It's not a "theory", dumb ****....it is fact.

Read the citation, uninformed twat.
 

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Peopke do use 556 for hunting,  you need knowledge on this topic

Some people use it for antelope and deer, but many consider it not powerful enough. The 5.56 mm round is a great hunting round for mid sized game like smaller hogs and coyotes. It not your go to rabbit cartridge and it's a bit underwhelming as a deer cartridge but it certainly has its place in the world

We know why Stoner developed it to go with the AR..

Read the citation, ****.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:17 pm

You certainly did.  

Next, all those S&W rifles I posted with a link are fine.  NONE of them bear the name AR 15.
 

 

No...we know that because we can't see my words in the required format. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:47 pm

No...we know that because we can't see my words in the required format. 

we see your ancestral displacement demanding words mean more than actual life in plain sight. realities are dream state of minds acted ancestrally out until fruition by laws that rule until extinction event arrives and nobody saw it coming.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm

It's not a "theory", dumb ****....it is fact.

Read the citation, uninformed twat.

I have destroyed your argument, Meltdown Mary.

Ps.  I politely asked you to specify WHICH citation.

Ill check tomorrow to if you complied.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm

We know why Stoner developed it to go with the AR..

Read the citation, ****.

Specify which citation, Mary.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:47 pm

No...we know that because we can't see my words in the required format.

I reposted them a few moments ago.  If you lie I will repost them with the time stamp.

See ya tomorrow Mary.

Read your messages.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm

We know why Stoner developed it to go with the AR..

Read the citation, ****.

What post is the citation in? I’d like to read it.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm

It's not a "theory", dumb ****....it is fact.

Read the citation, uninformed twat.

I just found and read the pertinent portion, your citation has errors. Stoner didn’t develop the 5.56 x 45mm NATO round.
 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 6:23 pm

What post is the citation in? I’d like to read it.

Then I suggest you scroll up.


 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 6:38 pm

I just found and read the pertinent portion, your citation has errors. Stoner didn’t develop the 5.56 x 45mm NATO round.

I'm not interested in your assertions.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:59 pm

I reposted them a few moments ago.  If you lie I will repost them with the time stamp.

See ya tomorrow Mary.

Read your messages.

You know the rule.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm

I'm not interested in your assertions.

“The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has officially standardized the 5.7x28 mm caliber, the third cartridge from the engineers at FN to receive the critical designation. The other two from the company, the 5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO, were accepted and adopted in 1981 and 1957, respectively. Standardization ensures the ammunition is interchangeable—regardless of country of original or manufacturer—and will provide operational efficiency in identically chambered firearms.”

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 7:31 pm

“The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has officially standardized the 5.7x28 mm caliber, the third cartridge from the engineers at FN to receive the critical designation. The other two from the company, the 5.56 NATO and 7.62 NATO, were accepted and adopted in 1981 and 1957, respectively. Standardization ensures the ammunition is interchangeable—regardless of country of original or manufacturer—and will provide operational efficiency in identically chambered firearms.”

What do you believe that demonstrates?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 8:02 pm

What do you believe that demonstrates?

Never mind, driftwood.
 

Cedar » 09 Jun 2022, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:24 pm

Never mind, driftwood.

No, ****.

You missed the "respectively", didn't you.

Cretin
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 6:44 pm

You know the rule.

You lose.

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 5:19 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:19 am

You lose.

here to retell, buzzy?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 9:25 pm

No, ****.

You missed the "respectively", didn't you.

Cretin

And that would matter why, stupid?
 

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 9:39 am

And that would matter why, stupid?

Because my bet is that your "evidence" that my citation is wrong is the year the OTHER round was adopted.

Is that correct?