Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:20 am

here to retell, buzzy?

retell it as often as you like, relive it again, it won't be what the whole event that happened originally taking place.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 9:41 am

Because my bet is that your "evidence" that my citation is wrong is the year the OTHER round was adopted.

Is that correct?

The 5.56 NATO round was developed in Belgium in the late 70's early 80's by FN  Herstal using the Remington 223 as the parent case. Eugene Stoner was involved with the development of the rem 223. While similar they are 2 different rounds with different ballistics. While you can safely fire a Rem 223 cartridge in a weapon chambered for NATO5.56 I wouldn't recommend firing a NATO 5.56 in  weapon chambered in 223. The 223 round produces lower pressures and has a shorter freebore than the NATO round.
 

ScottMon » 09 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm

Ok, So that is a valid point.  What about red flag laws?

The problem with red flag laws in today's world is that you could be ruled insane if you insist there are only two genders, and biological males have no place in woman's sports. God forbid you think children shouldn't be stuffing dollar bills in a drag queens g-string.
 

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:36 am

The problem with red flag laws in today's world is that you could be ruled insane if you insist there are only two genders, and biological males have no place in woman's sports. God forbid you think children shouldn't be stuffing dollar bills in a drag queens g-string.

You have no clue about how Red Flag laws work.  
 

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:55 am

You have no clue about how Red Flag laws work.

Sure do and they're unconstitutional.

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:55 am

You have no clue about how Red Flag laws work.

Are you still here ScottMundane?   

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:56 am

Sure do and they're unconstitutional.

So is gunning down a school full of children.  Do you see the conflict here?  
 

roadkill » 10 Jun 2022, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:57 am

Are you still here ScottMundane?

Are you still making excuses over school shooting? 
 

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

So is gunning down a school full of children.  Do you see the conflict here?

We already have laws against that. You will never end evil. The deadliest school attack in US history didn't even involve firearms.
 

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:07 am

We already have laws against that. You will never end evil. The deadliest school attack in US history didn't even involve firearms.

More excuses.  
 

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

The 5.56 NATO round was developed in Belgium in the late 70's early 80's by FN  Herstal using the Remington 223 as the parent case. Eugene Stoner was involved with the development of the rem 223. While similar they are 2 different rounds with different ballistics. While you can safely fire a Rem 223 cartridge in a weapon chambered for NATO5.56 I wouldn't recommend firing a NATO 5.56 in  weapon chambered in 223. The 223 round produces lower pressures and has a shorter freebore than the NATO round.
 

Same thing with 357 and 38 special.

Cedar » 10 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

The 5.56 NATO round was developed in Belgium in the late 70's early 80's by FN  Herstal using the Remington 223 as the parent case. Eugene Stoner was involved with the development of the rem 223. While similar they are 2 different rounds with different ballistics. While you can safely fire a Rem 223 cartridge in a weapon chambered for NATO5.56 I wouldn't recommend firing a NATO 5.56 in  weapon chambered in 223. The 223 round produces lower pressures and has a shorter freebore than the NATO round.

I didn’t want to get too detailed with him because his head would explode.  So he would strike thru it and claim it is not relevant.

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:04 am

Are you still making excuses over school shooting?

No...it's the culture that your ideology created.  

roadkill » 10 Jun 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:48 am

No...it's the culture that your ideology created.

Please explain.  

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:12 am

More excuses.

BE A "GOOD GUY WITH A GUN" LIKE STEVE.....NOT A WORTHLESS COWARD LIKE SCOTTMON


 

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:48 am

Please explain.

Yeah right. Yer party sells hate. And you idiots react.  
 

roadkill » 10 Jun 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:54 am

Yeah right. Yer party sells hate. And you idiots react.  
 

parties sell doubt where ancestors hate the time they get mutually evolving here so they join social mantras to feel better than being one of a kind so they become what they loathe, being one of a kind..

roadkill » 10 Jun 2022, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 11:54 am

Yeah right. Yer party sells hate. And you idiots react.

More excuses.  
 

ScottMon » 10 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm

More excuses.  
 

series parallel words; excuses/reasons/explanations/laws/order/demand/command/in charge/being charged rent to occupy space equally arrived as ancestrally displaced in sequence of ever changing population inception to conception, death and extinction.

rational ideas produce rational thoughts that direct those rationalizing away their biological time to obey relative time statistical averages that mislead everyone for the time they have evolving here now.

I just explained the induced insanity that drove an 18 year old to destroy 21 ancestors equally occupying space here. This species brought it upon itself defying how biology works socially everywhere.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 5:33 pm

@Blackvegetable  

More about hunting with the 556:

223/5.56 as a deer hunting caliber. While shots should still be limited to ranges maxing out at around 100 yards (the small bullet just sheds too much energy beyond that range), hunters can now feel confident in taking their rifles afield during deer season.Nov 3, 2016

https://www.realtree.com › why-you...Why You Should Use an AR-15 as a Deer Rifle | Realtree Camo
223/5.56 is NOT a legal big game hunting caliber, but 6.5 Grendel, 243 WSSM, etc. would be a legal caliber to hunt big game. There are similar restrictions in other states like Connecticut, Iowa, Virginia, New Jersey, Washington, and West Virginia, etc.May 21, 2018

https://www.brentonusa.com › is-it-l...Is it Legal to Hunt with an AR-15? | Brenton USA
Do you know why it is not legal to hunt BIG game with a 556?  Because it is not powerful enough. States make it illegal to hunt with because it may not injure the animal.

So much got your ammo theory,

It's not a "theory", dumb ****....it is fact.

Read the citation, uninformed twat.
 

 

Read that citation in my quote, Melt Down.  You have a problem with objective facts that reject your narratives.