Liberal Forum

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 2:25 pm

Read that citation in my quote, Melt Down.  You have a problem with objective facts that reject your narratives.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 3:08 pm

Dwarf,

You're the one with the narratives.

I have the citations.

Stop yapping crap

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 4:21 pm

That particular comment was made that crushed your hunting ignorance concerning 556.  I hav e told you.  Spend less time with strike thru and more time reading.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:34 am

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:26 am

That's nice.  We were discussing the components of a round.  Now acknowledge I was correct on what a bullet is.  

What's your point?  Can you tell us if the Uvalde Shooter used FMJ rounds or defense rounds?  That is an important part of your argument.  

I have already shown you the weapon is not the key factor in the power of a round.  You kept using Strike Thru.  

My 45 long colt defense rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

My 9mm ARX rounds are designed to be flesh obliterating rounds

Just about any Hollow Point is designed to be flesh obliterating rounds.

Have you posted the rifle model used yet?

Why do you keep yapping?

Try to grasp the point.

The AR-15 was designed to be an assault rifle. To accommodate its design AND purpose, Stoner developed a specific round with specific properties desirable in an assault rifle.

If your interest was in "sport" or "subsistence varmint hunting", you would only sell AR 15s configured for the .223.

Now post the model the kid in Texas used.

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:37 am

Irrelevant to DESIGN...

They shaved off some bits, left out a hole..but it's the AR 15

Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 11:20 am

You are wrong.

Go look.

Post what you learn.

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm

DDM4 rifles are available in three main calibers: 5.56mm NATO, . 300 AAC Blackout, and 6.8mm SPC. While there are pros and cons for each of these calibers, and reasons you may be attracted to one over the other, the majority of DDM4 rifles are chambered in 5.56mm.

https://danieldefense.com/wire/firearm-features

The 5.56 will also fire 223:

We only recommend the use of factory loaded, brass cased ammunition. We urge all of our customers to stay away from steel cased ammo and reloads. In regards to our 5.56 carbines, all are chambered and function tested with 5.56 ammunition. It is safe to shoot .223 Rem but not all will perform on the same level. Find some ammo that works, and stick with it.

https://danieldefense.com/faq

Ok, now make your point.

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 4:46 pm

You are wrong.  I posted it both rounds would work.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm

Did you read the citation about the development of the round?

ScottMon » 08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm

The only way the parents of a Uvalde victim could identify their dead child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrk4hVTZANo

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm

Stop making demands, twat.

The point being that national efforts at gun control work.

DeplorablePatriot » 10 Jun 2022, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 4:59 pm

Yes. Tragic. But it doesn't take a movie star to make that point for me to understand it. But it may for you. Liberals and their movie stars. Did you enjoy Depp's reference to personally assassinating President Trump? Most stars are nut cases.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm

Did you read the citation about the development of the round?

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:06 pm

Not relevant.
I am talking about the DDM4 that was used in the Uvalde shooting and your ignorant hunting comments.  

Your citation does not address that.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm

Now try again.

.**** idiot.

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:15 pm

You try again.  The DDM4 is not based on the Stoner weapon.  Already proved that.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:16 pm

Stop.

No more Dwarf v. Evidence

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:19 pm

I  already posted what weapon it is based on. Not a stoner weapon.

And using your criteria, since none of the weapons have the name or classification as AR 15 they won’t be banned:

https://www.smith-wesson.com/products/long-guns

You are on record as wanting weapons banned due to looks and name.  You lose.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:42 pm

 
 
Keep yapping at it.

Huey » 10 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jun 2022, 5:46 pm

At 15, thanks to “guys” like you has become a marketing term.  The DDM4 is not based on the stoner AR 15 you refer to.  It is based on the M4 that stoner had nothing to do with.  And as I said all the S&W weapons are fine in your book.

I  already posted what weapon it is based on. Not a stoner weapon.

And using your criteria, since none of the weapons have the name or classification as AR 15 they won’t be banned:

https://www.smith-wesson.com/products/long-guns

You are on record as wanting weapons banned due to looks and name.  You lose.