Liberal Forum

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm

Yup, they are more words and 100% true.  He had nothing to do with it.  He wasn’t even with Colt when they were designing the M4.

But that is all well and good.  This has nothing to do with the DDM4.

The M4 carbine is a 5.56×45mm NATO, gas-operated, magazine-fed, carbine developed in the United States during the 1980s. It is a shortened version of the M16A2 assault rifle.

The M16 rifle is a family of military rifles adapted from the ArmaLite AR-15 rifle for the United States military



Now shut the **** up, Tiny.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm

Forgot to address your ammo lie.  You were severely beaten by many parties on your ammo BS.

No, I wasn't. 

The round was developed, by Stoner, specifically for the Assault Rifle platform known as AR15.

What do you believe you won?


 

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 12:58 pm

If they have a VIOLENT temper chances are the law already knows about it.

well, not in any of the mass shootings we’ve had were people had legal guns. Like the Uvalde shooter. The guy in Buffalo as well?
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 12:58 pm

The M4 carbine is a 5.56×45mm NATO, gas-operated, magazine-fed, carbine developed in the United States during the 1980s. It is a shortened version of the M16A2 assault rifle.

The M16 rifle is a family of military rifles adapted from the ArmaLite AR-15 rifle for the United States military

Now shut the **** up, Tiny.

Who said it wasn’t?  When did Stoner work on it?  

None of that applies to the DDM4 series.  

 

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm

Who said it wasn’t?  When did Stoner work on it?  

None of that applies to the DDM4 series.

Who designed the AR 15?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm

No, I wasn't. 

The round was developed, by Stoner, specifically for the Assault Rifle platform known as AR15.

What do you believe you won?

Nobody said it wasn’t.

All we argued was that round is extremely common and is shot by many rifles  Like the one I posted a little while ago and you struck thru. It is not that destructive, or powerful round.  

The round is No more powerful because a DDM4 shot it.  

That is what you got beat on.

Pastafarian » 11 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:01 pm

well, not in any of the mass shootings we’ve had were people had legal guns. Like the Uvalde shooter. The guy in Buffalo as well?

The weapons were purchased legally.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm

Who designed the AR 15?

Who designed the DDM4 series?  

Stoner had no part in the M4 or the DDM4 series.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 11:20 am

It’s my fault.  I used to use it every so often and he could not figure out how I did it.  One day he must have seen the code in when he hit reply.  He has over used it ever since.  What’s funny he will strike thru fact and the later ask a question about where they were the answer.

Well he doesn't read anyway. He fulfills my predictions every time because of it. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:04 pm

Who designed the AR 15?

PS.  You have to specify if you asking about the ARmalite Rifle that became the c601 then Designated the M16 or the Colt Ar 15 with a different seat, trigger assembly, selector switch and barrel twist. 

Two different weapons.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm

Who designed the DDM4 series?  

Stoner had no part in the M4 or the DDM4 series.

Tiny,

The DDM4 is a version of the M4.

The M4 is a variant of the M16A2. 
(go to the DDM4 specifications page)

The M16A2 is based on the AR15 platform.

The AR15s design is Stoner's.

Stoner developed the NATO 5.56 specifically for his assault rifle.

End of story.


 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:00 pm

No, I wasn't. 

The round was developed, by Stoner, specifically for the Assault Rifle platform known as AR15.

What do you believe you won?


 

Same thing you do, the right to deny life is genetically self evident and both practice it 24/7.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm

PS.  You have to specify if you asking about the ARmalite Rifle that became the c601 then Designated the M16 or the Colt Ar 15 with a different seat, trigger assembly, selector switch and barrel twist. 

Two different weapons.

 No, I don't. 

Different components does not make it something other than it is.

It is an AR 15 variant.


 

Pastafarian » 11 Jun 2022, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 12:17 pm

Wasn’t the Uvalde shooter law abiding until he wasn’t. 

More gun safety courses and red flag laws can’t be as bad as you say.

They won't make any difference. As high profile targets can attest, the only thing that can stop a determined shooter is equal and opposing forces. Ending gun free zones would be more helpful than any other deterrent. At least post that gun free zones are guarded by undercover men with guns. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm

Tiny,

The DDM4 is a version of the M4.

The M4 is a variant of the M16A2. 
(go to the DDM4 specifications page)

The M16A2 is based on the AR15 platform.

The AR15s design is Stoner's.

Stoner developed the NATO 5.56 specifically for his assault rifle.

End of story.

They don’t have the rights. It also has a different bolt, sear, trigger assembly, barrel and selector switch.

Again, your issue is with the round, not the gun.  You already admitted that is based on appearance.  Why you still talking.

The 5.56 is shot by many weapons, like this one:


 

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:08 pm

Nobody said it wasn’t.

All we argued was that round is extremely common and is shot by many rifles  Like the one I posted a little while ago and you struck thru. It is not that destructive, or powerful round.  

The round is No more powerful because a DDM4 shot it.  

That is what you got beat on.

All we argued was that round is extremely common and is shot by many rifles

So what?

the round is what it is.

It is no good for shooting anything you want to eat.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm

They don’t have the rights. It also has a different bolt, sear, trigger assembly, barrel and selector switch.

Again, your issue is with the round, not the gun.  You already admitted that is based on appearance.  Why you still talking.

The 5.56 is shot by many weapons, like this one:

Enough.

You lost.

 

@Blackvegetable  

This is a 5.56


 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm

 No, I don't. 

Different components does not make it something other than it is.

It is an AR 15 variant.


 

you stereotype inanimate objects same way you do ancestors. ha ha ha ha ha ha. one track mantra mentality that will not accept why you exist in the first place.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm

@Blackvegetable  

This is a 5.56

For which weapon, and purpose, was the round SPECIFICALLY developed, and by whom?