Liberal Forum

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:17 pm

I grill like this:

Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm

Let's finish off your NATO reference.  They are designated NATO rounds because they are designed for military use.  They are nothing more than FMJ rounds.  They are not hollow points or any specialty PD rounds.  Reason being for years expandng bullets were considered illegal by Geneva Convention Standards, including the time when Stoner created this round.  Here is what soldiers say about this allegedly devastating round:

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired. 

That article is actually taking the line that expandable bullets (hollow points, etc) are allowed in combat and DOD has changed their rules:

https://www.justsecurity.org/25200/dod- ... -conflict/

While hollow points are commonly used by police and civilians, they are banned in international warfare under the 1899 Hague Convention's early laws of war that the United States has followed even though the U.S. government never ratified the agreement.

https://www.thetrace.org/2015/07/hollow ... n-us-army/

The point being is the round that Stoner created was not really as effective and destructive as you claim.  Let's talk ammo.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:21 pm

More people hunt deer with 556 than you think. Your influencers have led you dine the wrong path.  Anything much bigger than a deer, not so much.  It just not the all powerful round you make it out to be.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:23 pm

You struck this this last time.  Here is what soldiers said about the 556.

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm

ENTIRELY irrelevant.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:23 pm

People noodle for catfish...

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm

The more you release you were curbstomped the more you use strike then.  

And some people use dynamite.  What’s your point,..

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm

You're ability to deny that you've had your *** kicked is neither in doubt nor relevant. 

But thank you for sharing.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:26 pm

Entirely relevant. You all powerful round is not that great.

As far as hunting, 5.56 and 223, depending on the state, are illegal for big game.  Not all deer are considered big game.  The reason?  That small a round may only injure an animal.  I told you that before but you probably struck thu that as well.  What

Soldiers in combat suggested that existing ammunition (like the M855 5.56mm round) was often ineffective against the enemy, especially in urban environments where bullets tended to pass “through and through,” causing insufficient injury to put the enemy out of the fight, and escalating civilian deaths from ricochets and the increased number of bullets fired.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm

           

Dude, multiple people destroyed your influencers ideas. You wouldn’t know an assault rifle from a can of pepper spray.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm

Dude,

Please stop advertising your depressing existence.

It looks like a freshman dorm room.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:31 pm

:rofl:   :clap:   :rofl:   :clap:   :rofl:   :clap:  

Dude, multiple people destroyed your influencers ideas.  You wouldn’t know an assault rifle from a can of pepper spray.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm

Actually, that is a 70 inch Vizio HDR 4k. To my right is a love seat, a coffee table and movie shelf.  To my left is an end table, a full size couch, .

The room is the size of the two car garage below me.

Another fail on your end.  

Whatbelse you got?  You have been failing for a few weeks now with one exception.  And even that was weak.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:39 pm

You are riding your Vistalounger in front of a TV dinner table.

The balance of the tableau is even more dreary. 
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:39 pm

You are riding your Vistalounger in front of a TV dinner table.

The balance of the tableau is even more dreary.

Actually, that is a 70 inch Vizio HDR 4k. To my right is a love seat, a coffee table and movie shelf.  To my left is an end table, a full size couch, .

The room is the size of the two car garage below me.

Another fail on your end.  

Whatbelse you got?  You have been failing for a few weeks now with one exception.  And even that was weak.

omh » 11 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm

throw him a curve, ask him to define a defensive rifle that isn't considered an assault weapon by those conquering other people's homeland for their own use and abuse of established residents.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm

Not really. 

I’ll repost.

Tou were wrong.

Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 3:03 pm

No....really..

Don't bother.

Too much Sheilagh.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 3:01 pm

he won’t answer.

Huey » 11 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jun 2022, 3:05 pm

You can’t take it when your comments are proven false.