Liberal Forum

Nucleomituphobia » 13 Jun 2022, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 5:39 pm

is this the best you can come up with?
Your material is ****

I try to play down to my level of competition, occasionally I fail.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm

I bet you don't 

Why is it you remember everything you were programmed to believe true but you can never figure out you never stay the same details twice in logistical time always changing total sum you achieved changing form since conceived occupying space now?

the solution to preventing another 18 year old killing 19 elementary students and two teachers is in my rhetorical question.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm

The M249 is a "light machine gun", M4SelfInflictedHeadWound

So? I gotta hear this one.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:21 am

So? I gotta hear this one.

Does that spell "assault rifle" to you?


 

Nucleomituphobia » 13 Jun 2022, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 5:50 pm

If your mother or father is still alive, punch them in the head

Why?
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 6:17 am

Does that spell "assault rifle" to you?


 

Defensive weapon against mob assault on an individual minding his own business making a life on his own and everyone else wants his share he or she developed for themself or his or her family forward for generations to come.

Homo sapien is a predatory species but can be programmed as social prey/scavengers within their own family, social order, species between conflicting interpretations of life exceeds evolving here now.

Reality is governed by insect hive/colony mentality. wannabes anything other than all they ever are as displaced, ants pulling rubber tree plants, termites eating what the other two developed, cockroaches poaching off all three.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 6:17 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:21 am

So? I gotta hear this one.

Does that spell "assault rifle" to you?

Yes.  For the terms of the discussion, yes.  Two things to help you.  NFAs and the ATF recognize the M16, M4, etc that are in service with the military as machineguns.  I have posted that definition for you but you probably use strike thru.  The civilian models are not machine guns.  

Second, here is the list of rifles/carbines/submachine guns/machine guns in service with the military.  None have the name assault rifle.  None have the name AR 15. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... d_roles)_5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... s#Carbines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... chine_guns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... _service_5


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2022, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 4:24 pm

Nucleomituphobia » 13 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm

He is a **** *******

After which @Huey  would confuse a light machine gun with an assault rifle.
 

 

A shoulder fired light machine gun.  You are seriously saying that would not be considered an "assault weapon"?

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:19 am

A shoulder fired light machine gun.  You are seriously saying that would not be considered an "assault weapon"?

Sheilagh,

You should have read the citation instead of lying about having done so.
 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am

Yes.  For the terms of the discussion, yes.  Two things to help you.  NFAs and the ATF recognize the M16, M4, etc that are in service with the military as machineguns.  I have posted that definition for you but you probably use strike thru.  The civilian models are not machine guns.  

Second, here is the list of rifles/carbines/submachine guns/machine guns in service with the military.  None have the name assault rifle.  None have the name AR 15. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... d_roles)_5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... s#Carbines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... chine_guns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... _service_5

They are irrelevant,  you dumb ****.

Go back to the question you failed to answer.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:41 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:19 am

A shoulder fired light machine gun.  You are seriously saying that would not be considered an "assault weapon"?

Sheilagh,

You should have read the citation instead of lying about having done so.
 

 

I don't have to read the citation, I have shot the damn thing.  Oh, by the way, it fires NATO 5.56.  I know how important that is to you.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:42 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am

Yes.  For the terms of the discussion, yes.  Two things to help you.  NFAs and the ATF recognizeb the M16, M4, etc that are in service with the military as machineguns.  I have posted that definition for you but you probably use strike thru.  The civilian models are not machine guns.  

Second, here is the list of rifles/carbines/submachine guns/machine guns in service with the military.  None have the name assault rifle.  None have the name AR 15. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... d_roles)_5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... s#Carbines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... chine_guns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... _service_5

They are irrelevant,  you dumb ****.

Go back to the question you failed to answer.
 

 

No, they are not irrelevant.  If you keep using strike thru you will remain ignorant. 
 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:44 am

No, they are not irrelevant. If you keep using strike thru you will remain ignorant.

They have absolutely nothing to do with the reason the AR15 was designed and developed. 

You should read the citation, "armorer".

You have no idea what an assault rifle is, or why.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:43 am

I don't have to read the citation, I have shot the damn thing.  Oh, by the way, it fires NATO 5.56.  I know how important that is to you.

You certainly do.

But I want to know why you lied about it.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:42 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:13 am

Yes.  For the terms of the discussion, yes.  Two things to help you.  NFAs and the ATF recognize[ the M16, M4, etc that are in service with the military as machineguns.  I have posted that definition for you but you probably use strike thru.  The civilian models are not machine guns.  

Second, here is the list of rifles/carbines/submachine guns/machine guns in service with the military.  None have the name assault rifle.  None have the name AR 15. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... d_roles)_5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... s#Carbines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... chine_guns

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_i ... _service_5

They are irrelevant,  you dumb ****.

Go back to the question you failed to answer.
 

 

Of course it is relevant.  


 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:50 am

Of course it is relevant.

**** idiot 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:47 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:44 am

No, they are not irrelevant. If you keep using strike thru you will remain ignorant.

They have absolutely nothing to do with the reason the AR15 was designed and developed. 

You should read the citation, "armorer".

You have no idea what an assault rifle is, or why.

 

We have already been over this.  You lost.  You refuse to specify which weapon you are discussing.  The Armalite Rifle 15 which became the Colt c601 and designated the M 16 was a weapon designed for the battlefield.  The ATF classifies it a class 3 NFA weapon as a machine gun.  You have the Certification Letter.  

The Colt SP1 AR 15 was specifically designed for civilians use and marketed as a hunting rifle.  You have one of the marketing ads.  It was no more dangerous than any other semi automatic weapon.  

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:48 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 7:43 am

I don't have to read the citation, I have shot the damn thing.  Oh, by the way, it fires NATO 5.56.  I know how important that is to you.

You certainly do.

But I want to know why you lied about it.

 

I haven't lied about it.  You have not said why it is a lie.  Tell me in your own words, not some else's.  Plus, the military has no weapon named or under a specific category name Assault Rifle. 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm

Huey » 13 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm

I’m done.  Case is closed.  You lost.  Read the citation and the certification letter.

https://youtu.be/nfq-3CQ_Vuc?t=52
 

 

I saw the first few seconds of that.  The citation I gave discusses it.  You should have read it.  This is getting tedious. 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:00 am

I saw the first few seconds of that. The citation I gave discusses it.  You should have read it.  This is getting tedious.

Sheilagh, 

Explain what the ATF had to do with the DESIGN of the AR15.