Liberal Forum

Nucleomituphobia » 14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm

DERP, NOD IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THIS BCG IS FULLY AUTOMATIC.

@Huey  slap some sense into this Russian Studies major

I don't deal with virgins.

Nature has spoken.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:10 pm

the SP1 is irrelevant. 

Read the citation,  "armorer"

I have already shown I read it.  Make your point please.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:10 pm

the SP1 is irrelevant. 

Read the citation,  "armorer"

The SP1 is the topic of discussion.  You arguments have been destroyed.  Everything from your reaching with your ammunition garbage to the BCG, trigger and sear.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:46 pm

Nucleomituphobia » 14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm

DERP, NOD IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THIS BCG IS FULLY AUTOMATIC.

@Huey  slap some sense into this Russian Studies major

I don't deal with virgins.

Nature has spoken.
 

 

Why are you still on this thread?  You have been curbstomped viciously numerous times and you keep coming back for more.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:37 am

Don't know.  It is not on the lists I gave you, You struck thru them.  

Take a look at this and tell me the difference:

Look very very carefully. 

Orignal M16 lower:


 
Orginal SP1 Lower:

@Blackvegetable    notice what is different?  Do I need to repost your 5.56 argument?

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:28 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:21 am

What was the 1st "assault rifle"?

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

I told you I read it.

 

Waiting on your answer.  I am very familiar with a citation that lie by claiming I didn’t read.  

Nucleomituphobia » 14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm

DERP, NOD IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THIS BCG IS FULLY AUTOMATIC.

@Huey  slap some sense into this Russian Studies major

I just did, again.
 
 
 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:22 pm

@Blackvegetable    notice what is different?  Do I need to repost your 5.56 argument?

Read the citation. 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:25 pm

I just did, again.

What is either SAD or COMICAL depending on your  POV is that BV is the ONLY ONE HERE who thinks he is fooling anyone but himself.
No matter how many times his false claims get shot down with cold, hard facts at HUEY'S AR15 ACADEMY...he  simply refuses to accept the fact that he has flunked out and at this point only making a cringeworthy spectacle of himself...

 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:24 pm

Waiting on your answer.  I am very familiar with a citation that lie by claiming I didn’t read.

What was the first "assault rifle"?

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm

What was the first "assault rifle"?

The sling David killed Goliath with firing a stone with centrifugal force. my sarcasm as usual

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:27 pm

Read the citation.

I am more familiar with it than you are.  And I understand it.

It is time for you to make your point.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm

What was the first "assault rifle"?

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

Your either talking about a lever action or the German weapon.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm

What was the first "assault rifle"?

I can tell you it was not the SP1 chambered for 223 and only one fire selection.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

Your either talking about a lever action or the German weapon.

Read the citation.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:50 pm

I am more familiar with it than you are.  And I understand it.

It is time for you to make your point.

What did the citation identify as the first "assault rifle"?

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:52 pm

I can tell you it was not the SP1 chambered for 223 and only one fire selection.

Read the citation. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:53 pm

What did the citation identify as the first "assault rifle"?

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

As referred to by your citation that YOU did not read.  All you gotta do is specify,  and I will answer,

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:58 pm

Read the citation.

I did.  Make your point.  But, the SP 1 was motioned.  Which is the point of this discussion.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm

I did.  Make your point.  But, the SP 1 was motioned.  Which is the point of this discussion.

You haven't  read the citation. 

Why do you keep lying about it?