Liberal Forum

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:12 pm

I did.  Make your point.  But, the SP 1 was motioned.  Which is the point of this discussion.

So **** goddamned stupid..

Read the citation 

The Eastern Front: The Cradle of the Assault Rifle
 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm

So **** goddamned stupid..

Read the citation 

The Eastern Front: The Cradle of the Assault Rifle

You could have answered much earlier.  You are a drama queen,

Its the german weapon.  Now you have a point to make.  

If you don’t have a point I will be back tomorrow to curbstomp you on the ammo **** you tried to sell.  

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:21 pm

You haven't  read the citation. 

Why do you keep lying about it?

Lnso!

make your point or tomorrow is gonna be really bad for you,


 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm

You could have answered much earlier. [S[ You are a drama queen,[/s]

Its the german weapon.  Now you have a point to make.  

If you don’t have a point I will be back tomorrow to curbstomp you on the ammo **** you tried to sell.

Why does Sheilagh lie?

Because blackvegetable.

Tell me how you missed this...

Sturmgewehr 44: The First Assault Rifle

In response to the demands of the battlefield, the Germans developed the Sturmgewehr (Stg) 44 whose name translates as “Assault Rifle.” Its model number is derived from the year of its issue, 1944.

The point being that you are a **** moron.


QED

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm

Lnso!

make your point or tomorrow is gonna be really bad for you,

Why tomorrow?

**** moron.

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm

Lnso!

make your point or tomorrow is gonna be really bad for you,

Hey Huey, is his dementia getting worse? I had to remind him that the rules/stipulations are posted in my sig for 4 consecutive days. He still demands I post them, even after he has already been reminded countless of times. 

Vegas » 14 Jun 2022, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:49 pm

Hey Huey, is his dementia getting worse? I had to remind him that the rules/stipulations are posted in my sig for 4 consecutive days. He still demands I post them, even after he has already been reminded countless of times.

Tell Tiny why it isn't a rule.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:05 pm

Tell Tiny why it isn't a rule.

Nobody **** cares about your opinion of the rule. 
And **** your demands. Rule 1, idiot.

Vegas » 14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm

Nobody **** cares about your opinion of the rule. 
And **** your demands. Rule 1, idiot.

Do it, mincing pansy...now!

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm

Do it, mincing pansy...now!

Make me , bitch. 

 

Questions: Is the AR-15 designed to kill faster than a regular pistol?
Is the AR-15 more able to puncture flesh and bone than a regular pistol?

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm

Why does Sheilagh lie?

Because blackvegetable.

Tell me how you missed this...

Sturmgewehr 44: The First Assault Rifle

In response to the demands of the battlefield, the Germans developed the Sturmgewehr (Stg) 44 whose name translates as “Assault Rifle.” Its model number is derived from the year of its issue, 1944.

The point being that you are a **** moron.

QED

What features of the STG-44 make it an assault rifle? It’s probably the select fire feature. Would you agree?
 

Cedar » 14 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm

What features of the STG-44 make it an assault rifle? It’s probably the select fire feature. Would you agree?

Read the citation.
 

Vegas » 14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:31 pm

Nobody **** cares about your opinion of the rule. 
And **** your demands. Rule 1, idiot.

nevermind or never mind social consensus as absolute truth to make laws protecting speculation over adapting to time mutually evolving being alive here "evolving/coexisting" in sequence of ancestral additions changing population forward now..

when people won't accept now is perpetually balancing outcomes, where will they ever find understanding of eternal changes sustaining their time equally occupying space here since conceived.

the key to ending intellectually created typecasting people to feel inferior to those controlling the persuasion of power being just abused power of suggestion selling hope, faith, charity to keep next generations obedient to make believe now isn't eternity. Worked last 300 or more generations.

If it isn't broke, don't change the methodology. Now everyone complain about everything is corrupted and then say nobody knows how it came about?

Compounding choices made by compounding reproductions ignoring how, why, which, what, where, when, whom to each generation existed since inception of their species, race, creed, color, national origin, gender bias, language, ideology, political leaning, spiritual conviction real doesn't matter, economic status leading people to always compromise by never agreeing life is limited to being alive now.

How many people haven't figured out Green is the center spectrum of daylight. Violet is lowest frequency and red the highest. Now many people never figured out direct current is results of same magnetic polarities pushing apart generation light waves from center mass of this universe and a star is the 90 and 270 degree electromagnetic polar opposites of push, pull that does 3 phases of alternating current since there are 3 types of molecular matter spontaneously existing simultaneously combining into forms shaped universally present evolving into results never duplicated twice.

Evolving whole universe experts say the average brain cannot comprehend, but here I am comprehending how eternity and eternal separation of details happens in plain sight being one displacement mutually evolving here as a limited sole occupying time with free will to ignore or accept real time.

I am the last honest reproduction of this species.

ScottMon » 14 Jun 2022, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 8:58 pm

Questions: Is the AR-15 designed to kill faster than a regular pistol?
Is the AR-15 more able to puncture flesh and bone than a regular pistol?

No and no.

ScottMon » 08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 1:19 pm

The only way the parents of a Uvalde victim could identify their dead child.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrk4hVTZANo

Did you see any green high tops in Chicago where gun laws are very strict?  
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm

You could have answered much earlier. [S[ You are a drama queen,[/s]

Its the german weapon.  Now you have a point to make.  

If you don’t have a point I will be back tomorrow to curbstomp you on the ammo **** you tried to sell.

Why does Sheilagh lie?

Because blackvegetable.

Tell me how you missed this...

Sturmgewehr 44: The First Assault Rifle

THere was no lie.  Note the below post where in paras I stated "the one labeled First assault rifle".  All you had to do was specify which you are talking about and you have had your answer yesterday morning. 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:28 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:21 am

What was the 1st "assault rifle"?

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

I told you I read it.

 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:20 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:18 am

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:15 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle#Definition[/s]

Read the citation.

I think YOU did not read the citation.  I got the idea to post that FROM THE END OF THE CITATION!!!!    

But anyway, the Army does not think it is an assault weapon.

Any way, from the US Army definition of an assault rifle

The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle#Definition

AND, the above argument is based on the very end of your citation.  You have lied for quite a while on this.  Got one more post for you.  
 
 

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:51 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm

What was the first "assault rifle"?

Modern day (the one labeled First assault rifle) or what was considered an assault rifle in the 19th Century?

Your either talking about a lever action or the German weapon.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm

Huey » 14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 5:34 pm

You could have answered much earlier. [S[ You are a drama queen,[/s]

Its the german weapon.  Now you have a point to make.  

If you don’t have a point I will be back tomorrow to curbstomp you on the ammo **** you tried to sell.

Why does Sheilagh lie?

Because blackvegetable.

Tell me how you missed this...

Sturmgewehr 44: The First Assault Rifle

In response to the demands of the battlefield, the Germans developed the Sturmgewehr (Stg) 44 whose name translates as “Assault Rifle.” Its model number is derived from the year of its issue, 1944.

The point being that you are a **** moron.


QED

 

Your either talking about a lever action or the German weapon.

I did not miss that.  

Now, what does any of this have to do with a hunting rifle, the SP1, that was chambered for .223?

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2022, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 4:16 pm

ConsRule » 08 Jun 2022, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 3:52 pm

That is a lie. He was NOT inside the school or present while bodies were being identified.  He is simply (at best) recounting what was told him. It's not out of the realm of possibilities that he (or whomever told him) is making **** up.

Stoner changed all these variables by reducing the bullet weight, increasing velocity, and reducing the rotation rate. When these bullets struck a body, they behaved erratically. This began with a tumbling effect wherein the bullet began cartwheeling through tissue, creating a much wider and more ragged channel with its long axis, rather than its diameter. In addition to instability in orientation, the 5.56mm bullets were also unstable in direction. When encountering bone or different tissue density, the bullets would carom off, making a new path of destruction. Rather than a straight tunnel, the 5.56mm bullets would tear a zigzag channel with more lateral cavitation than other calibers. This explains the comments of some doctors that wounds from these rounds “look like a bomb had gone off in there.” And they also explain how even when wounds are sewn up, they sometimes collapse. This indicates semi-permanent cavitation where, even though a structure has survived, it has suffered such deep fibrous tearing that it can no longer support itself. There is a general medical opinion that wounds to the thorax with this caliber are typically fatal.

https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/exhibit ... -violence/ 

 

Good for Stoner.  As the record shows the SP1 as chambered for .223 and has only one fire selection.  Which is labeled Fire but is semi automatic.

You have the sources and pics.  What else you got?  

Blackvegetable » 14 Jun 2022, 11:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 11:10 pm

Cedar » 14 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm

What features of the STG-44 make it an assault rifle? It’s probably the select fire feature. Would you agree?

Read the citation.
 

 

Read the citation I provided with the US Army definition of an assault rifle.