Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:41 am

Of course.  But I won't stop with facts.

If the facts contradict him, then you can expect more strikethroughs and him saying "you are a **** idiot." 

His predictability is insufferable.


@Blackvegetable  

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am

@Huey  Looks like Uvalde Shooter had a "Hell Fire" trigger......

maybe it is the triggers fault ?

Hellfire: The Uvalde Shooter Owned a Device That Makes AR-15s Even More Deadly

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hel ... 37235.html

We'll see if any argues this point.  

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:33 am

Good for you.  Try to break 90.

You struck the the answer.  I guess you have no point.  You lose.   Your issue is with the ammo, not the weapon.

Sheilagh,

My point has always been the same.

All the evidence supports my position.

You have no case, only a set of disparate irrelevant factoids, 

Whenever you run into another dead end you bleat the same ****.
"Make a case."

 

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am

@Huey  Looks like Uvalde Shooter had a "Hell Fire" trigger......

maybe it is the triggers fault ?

Hellfire: The Uvalde Shooter Owned a Device That Makes AR-15s Even More Deadly

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hel ... 37235.html

Maybe you mincing nancys should find another way to compensate.

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:39 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:33 am

Good for you.  Try to break 90.

You struck the the answer.  I guess you have no point.  You lose.   Your issue is with the ammo, not the weapon.

Sheilagh,

My point has always been the same.

All the evidence supports my position.

You have no case, only a set of disparate irrelevant factoids, 

Whenever you run into another dead end you bleat the same ****.
"Make a case."

 

 

You struck thru the answer.  This isn't the first time.  Don't bother asking questions if you don;t like the answer.

Unfortunately we do not know what your position is.  So by all means, post your position.  Now it seems, like I said days ago, your issue is with the ammo.  Not the weapon.  You would understand my position if you would actually read the info provided. 

Please, by all means, post your position.

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:43 am

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:20 am

@Huey  Looks like Uvalde Shooter had a "Hell Fire" trigger......

maybe it is the triggers fault ?

Hellfire: The Uvalde Shooter Owned a Device That Makes AR-15s Even More Deadly

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/hel ... 37235.html

Maybe you mincing nancys should find another way to compensate.

Maybe you should have read the article. 
 
 

Vegas » 15 Jun 2022, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 9:29 am

Has anyone ever witnessed this asshole actually debate without incessant questions or demands? 

All this mother **** does is ask questions. Nobody even knows what stand he takes on anything.

Watch this: 
1. His dementia will kick in and demand that I post the rule/stipulations.

Has anyone ever witnessed this asshole actually debate without incessant questions or demands? 

Unreal.

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

Maybe you should have read the article.

I did, lying little twatty.

It makes my point.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

Unreal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPZW-_QQPx4

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:45 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

Maybe you should have read the article.

I did, lying little twatty.

It makes my point.
 

 

Then you know the shooter did not use it in the attack.  And no one here knows what your point is. 

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

You struck thru the answer.  This isn't the first time.  Don't bother asking questions if you don;t like the answer.

Unfortunately we do not know what your position is.  So by all means, post your position.  Now it seems, like I said days ago, your issue is with the ammo.  Not the weapon.  You would understand my position if you would actually read the info provided.

Please, by all means, post your position.

Just for **** and giggles, repost your "stand"..

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm

Stop making demands, twat.

The point being that national efforts at gun control work.

Why do you want gun control?  Your issue is with the ammo.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm

ConsRule » 08 Jun 2022, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 4:25 pm

That's not what the actor said...but keep spinning.

Enough...

The Justice of the Peace has made his public statements, and we understand the effects of the rounds used.

 

Here ya go with the ammo again.

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am

Why do you want gun control?  Your issue is with the ammo.

Sheilagh, 

Stop the retelling.

You know your rule.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

You struck thru the answer.  This isn't the first time.  Don't bother asking questions if you don;t like the answer.

Unfortunately we do not know what your position is.  So by all means, post your position.  Now it seems, like I said days ago, your issue is with the ammo.  Not the weapon.  You would understand my position if you would actually read the info provided. 

Please, by all means, post your position.

Just for **** and giggles, repost your "stand"..

 

You were asked first.  Divert with demands and strike thru.  

You struck thru the answer.  This isn't the first time.  Don't bother asking questions if you don;t like the answer.

Unfortunately we do not know what your position is.  So by all means, post your position.  Now it seems, like I said days ago, your issue is with the ammo.  Not the weapon.  You would understand my position if you would actually read the info provided. 

Please, by all means, post your position.
You were asked first.  Divert with demands and strike thru.  

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:48 am

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:46 am

Why do you want gun control?  Your issue is with the ammo.

Sheilagh, 

Stop the retelling.

You know your rule.
 

 

I posted your own words.  This is why it is important for you to post your stand.  You won't.  Because than your words would be under scrutiny and you are not man enough to allow that.  

A 5.56 does not come out of the barrel any more powerful out of a DDM4 7 series than it does out of Mini Ruger.  

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:44 am

Unreal.

Oh look, a one word response from Veghead. As usual, he has no thoughts of his own. 

Watch: 
1. You will use your cop-out "it writes itself." 

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:48 am

Sheilagh, 

Stop the retelling.

You know your rule.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPZW-_QQPx4

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:51 am

I posted your own words.  This is why it is important for you to post your stand.  You won't.  Because than your words would be under scrutiny and you are not man enough to allow that.  

A 5.56 does not come out of the barrel any more powerful out of a DDM4 7 series than it does out of Mini Ruger.

Are these YOUR words?

Your issue is with the ammo.

 

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 10:55 am

you are undercompensated

Nature has a way of making that call.

Don't wait by the phone.