No, you posted your words, lying little asshole..Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No, in your own words. I will find this post and repost. When I ask if this your case have the courtesy to say yes or no.
Don't overlook the fact that you are, literally, thicker than ****.
So my question is, "SO"?Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑Is this your case?Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑You are lying, Thicker than ****.Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ I know you have not posted your stand. If it is different than what your words indicate please let us know.
The 5.56 mm is yet more evidence that the AR 15 sold to civilians is a variant of the Assualt Rifle designed by Stoner.
Do you understand?
Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑No, you posted your words, lying little asshole..Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No, in your own words. I will find this post and repost. When I ask if this your case have the courtesy to say yes or no.
Yet I am winning this argument.Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't overlook the fact that you are, literally, thicker than ****.
For the record.Blackvegetable » 09 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑Yes..Huey » 09 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ More proof you opinion is based on looks as opposed to function.
It sells to people with severe issues.
And the cherry on top is that it works as designed.
No, you're not.
As accurate today as when I posted it.
Stop lying.
where did every verifiable fact come from? Ancestors dedicated to the proposition real living cannot be actual life evolving in plain sight without intellectual supervision..Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you're not.
You have lost on every single point of verifiable fact, and have embarrassed the armorer's guild.
Then what?Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Show which post I did not quote you concerning your "retelling" story.
No...you must stop presuming to translate English for those of us with superior comprehension skills...Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Meaning that you want it banned on looks. It can't be function because it is nothing but a standard semi automatic weapon. Nothing special. Doesn't do anything different.
Irrelevant.Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ So my question is, "SO"?
1. The AR 15 sold to civilians does not have an automatic selection. Without it the AR 15 "variant" is just another semi auto like the Ruger Mini 14.
2. A 5.56 is no more powerful shot from a DDM4 7 series than it is out of any other semi automatic that shoots it.
3. A Mustang V6 is a variant of the Mustang GT. But the V6 does not function and operate like the GT does. Same theory applies here. It looks mean and nasty but it operates no different than another semi automatic.
4. You have already stated that appearance is what you are basing your opinion on.
Do you understand?
You comprehend what people choose to believe has what missing in it? Anyone understanding time relativity logistics doesn't match compounding DNA as thermodynamically evolving here now or ancestors are naturally eternally separated as biologically positioned.Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ No...you must stop presuming to translate English for those of us with superior comprehension skills...
In December of 1959, Colt would begin producing a variant of Armalite’s rifle and designated it the Colt AR-15 Model 601.Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
It is a shame if you were in charge we couldn't have this one: