Liberal Forum

Hunter Biden berated his sister-in-law Hallie Biden and accused her of ruining his life after he learned she had thrown his gun in the trash near a Delaware high school in October 2018, newly revealed texts from a copy of his abandoned laptop show.

Hunter lamented that Hallie, the widow of his brother Beau, had given the impression he’s “an abusive pedophile with homicidal tendencies” and said that “that’s now in the hands of the FBI.” He said police and the bureau opened an investigation into him over the incident. The Secret Service also inserted itself into the saga, according to other texts from Hunter, although the agency has denied involvement.

“Beau owned a handgun issued by the state and I[t] was in the front glove compartment of his car. So f*** you … What right do you f***ing have Hallie,” Hunter said in the Oct. 23, 2018, text exchange, just hours after Hallie discarded his gun. “There are 5 guns in dads house. There are f***ing more weapons in your sons room then in an armory.”
https://defconnews.com/2022/06/15/gun-g ... s-he-owns/

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:16 pm

Then what?

We’ll see if you can back up your comments.  

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:18 pm

No...you must stop presuming to translate English for those of us with superior comprehension skills...

You said what you said.  Instead of attacking (failure) go ahead explain yourself.

I got you tears ago on the 22 that looked like an Ar 15.

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:24 pm

Irrelevant. 

Do you understand why you don't have the essentials to understand why?

So far you got nothing.  Nothing factual.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm

In December of 1959, Colt would begin producing a variant of Armalite’s rifle and designated it the Colt AR-15 Model 601.

https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/ ... le/451457#

I have already told you that.  Less strike thru, more reading.  Tell me something I don’t know on the topic.

Oh, that pic?  That it is the same rifle you don’t want to ban.  That weapon is Ruger Mini 14. Instead of a wooden stock they made it look mean and scary.

For this post I will break my new rule:

Youre a **** *******.

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:54 pm

bolt action rifles shoot .556

He just used my pic and associated it with An Armalite Rifle 15 that became the M 16.

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 4:45 pm

I have already told you that.  Less strike thru, more reading.  Tell me something I don’t know on the topic.

Oh, that pic?  That it is the same rifle you don’t want to ban.  That weapon is Ruger Mini 14. Instead of a wooden stock they made it look mean and scary.

For this post I will break my new rule:

Youre a **** *******.

At what point do you acknowledge that you've had your *** kicked?

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 4:54 pm

At what point do you acknowledge that you've had your *** kicked?

I haven’t.  

@Nucleomituphobia   this guy is a hoot. 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 3:32 pm

In December of 1959, Colt would begin producing a variant of Armalite’s rifle and designated it the Colt AR-15 Model 601.

https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/ ... le/451457#

Don’t know why you would tag That pic wiith something about the M 16.  

That weapon system was based on The M 14 which was designed in the 50s and was issued to the military in 1959.  By Ruger.  Not Colt.  Not designed by Stoner.  

The mini came out in 1973.  The problem with you associating it with the Colt is problematic for you.  Because the patents didn’t run out on the Ar SP1 until 1977.  Ruger could not have copied it.

I knew where you would go with this.  And you did.  I thank you.  Now off to the corner.

@Nucleomituphobia  

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:09 pm

Don’t know why you would tag That pic wiith something about the M 16.  

That weapon system was based on The M 14 which was designed in the 50s and was issued to the military in 1959.  By Ruger.  Not Colt.  Not designed by Stoner.  

The mini came out in 1973.  The problem with you associating it with the Colt is problematic for you.  Because the patents didn’t run out on the Ar SP1 until 1977.  Ruger could not have copied it.

I knew where you would go with this.  And you did.  I thank you.  Now off to the corner.

@Nucleomituphobia

WTF is your point?

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm

I haven’t.  

@Nucleomituphobia   this guy is a hoot.

You're on crack.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:17 pm

WTF is your point?

That you are running around here clueless ranting about stoner, and 5.57, like a meth head,

That weapons nothing to do with them.  Zero.

Take your loss on the entire thread like a man.  Because I am not stopping.  

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm

I haven’t.  

@Nucleomituphobia   this guy is a hoot.

Are these your words?

The AR 15 Sporter was designed for CIVILIAN and Police use.  How many times do I have to tell you that?

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:18 pm

You're on crack.

Like a typical prog dem you accused others of doing what  you do!    

Blackvegetable » 15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm

Are these your words?

Yes, and it is true.

I have been answering you questions all day.  Now make a coherent point.

Tomorrow is going be fun.

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm

That you are running around here clueless ranting about stoner, and 5.57, like a meth head,

That weapons nothing to do with them.  Zero.

Take your loss on the entire thread like a man.  Because I am not stopping.

No...

I have a discreet and consistent case, supported by citations.

You have left a trail of false assertions. 

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:22 pm

Yes, and it is true.

I have been answering you questions all day.  Now make a coherent point.

Tomorrow is going be fun.

In December of 1959, Colt would begin producing a variant of Armalite’s rifle and designated it the Colt AR-15 Model 601.



:rofl:  

Now make a coherent point.

**** idiot.
 

Nucleomituphobia » 15 Jun 2022, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 7:37 pm

@Blackvegetable  TAKE A STAND! MAKE A COHERENT POINT!

You have no reason to go on.

Take the ammosexual way out.
 

Huey » 15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm

That you are running around here clueless ranting about stoner, and 5.57, like a meth head,

That weapons nothing to do with them.  Zero.

Take your loss on the entire thread like a man.  Because I am not stopping.

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-o ... o-powerful

The unromantic reality of increasingly industrialized war wasn’t likely to capture the public imagination, and so, in ads, dime-store novels, and movies, gun companies proposed a self-serving alternative history. Though Southern Plains tribes like the Comanches had been decimated less by firearms than by disease, Winchester described its Model 73 repeating rifle—a specially promoted gun that had been used by Billy the Kid and Buffalo Bill—as “the gun that won the West”; this legend helped the company to sell almost thirty times as many guns in 1914 as it had in 1875. Blending the military and civilian domains, Winchester advertised its weapons as “For Military and Sporting Purposes”; Colt marketed its Single Action Army model as “the Peacemaker,” a weapon “for all who travel among dangerous communities.” The Thompson machine gun, developed as a trench-clearing tool during the First World War, was advertised through images showing cowboys defending their ranches against marauders; ads proclaimed the machine gun “the ideal weapon for the protection of large estates, ranches, plantations, etc.” A deadly but inaccurate weapon of industrialized war was recast as a precision instrument for taming the supposedly savage frontier.
 

These arguments dovetailed with work being done by an engineer named Eugene Stoner, who was tinkering in his garage in Hollywood, California, during the nineteen-fifties. Shy, reserved, and opinionated, Stoner was a Marine Corps veteran who’d fought in the Pacific theatre; he lacked a formal engineering education, but had worked his way up through the machine shop at the Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corporation. By the middle of the decade, Stoner had begun to apply his experience with aircraft ordnance to firearms. Using advanced alloys and lightweight parts that were common in aeronautics, he started developing a firing mechanism for a new kind of lightweight rifle. Success was slow in coming; the barrel of Stoner’s first prototype burst in Army tests. The weight of U.S. military opinion was in favor of a heavier, more powerful weapon, the M14. His fortunes began to change when one of S.C.H.V.’s boosters, General Willard G. Wyman, asked Stoner to modify his rifle so that it could shoot a redesigned .223-calibre round weighing roughly a tenth of an ounce.

 The resulting rifle, the AR-15, could fire its .223 round at more than thirty-two hundred feet per second—nearly three times the speed of sound. Stoner later explained the advantages of its smaller bullets to Congress. All bullets are “stabilized to fly through the air,” he said, but “when they hit something, they immediately go unstable.” Tiny bullets, having a smaller mass, grow unstable faster, and tumble through the body, causing disproportionate damage. As a smaller bullet tumbles, it transfers its energy to your organs and creates shock waves strong enough to sever muscle; if such a bullet strikes your head, the pressure it creates can shatter your skull or squeeze brain tissue through your sinuses. It might also fragment inside the body, scattering small pieces of itself and increasing the damage.


ibid.