Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 09 Jun 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 8:08 am

Ask him a direct question. It's funny to see self-proclaimed experts dodge.

 

....notice how these lying, republican-radio-level @ssholes, FOSTARD AND DWEEBTARD, [and monetary ignoramuses] never provide any examples...    
 

peepee » 09 Jun 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:19 am

:rolleyes:  

....notice how this lying, republican-radio-level @sshole [and monetary ignoramus] never provides any examples...  :rofl:  

All the examples you provide are symbolism over substance philosophies used historically by ruling elites creating conflicting interpretations of how life works beyond mutually evolving here.

omh » 09 Jun 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:22 am

All the moronic examples I provide are the result of many many years of bad habits, drugs, food, etc...

 

...the lame, and i mean f@cking lame, dumb@ss, fostard, yaps  about some 'invisible oligarchy' in one breath and then says we don't need a transparent thorough audit of ((((((THE MONEY)))))) WHICH WOULD MAKE 'THEM' MUCH MUCH MORE VI$IBLE...some 'genius', this @sshole..       

peepee » 09 Jun 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:25 am

All the moronic examples I provide are the result of many many years of bad habits, drugs, food, etc...

 
[/quote]

peepee » 09 Jun 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:31 am

...the lame, and i mean f@cking lame, dumb@ss, fostard, yaps :o  about some 'invisible oligarchy' in one breath and then says we don't need a transparent thorough audit of ((((((THE MONEY)))))) WHICH WOULD MAKE 'THEM' MUCH MUCH MORE VI$IBLE...some 'genius', this @sshole..  :rofl:   :die:   :lol:  

again, thank you for destroying your own reality.

peepee » 09 Jun 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 10:19 am

 

....notice how these lying, republican-radio-level @ssholes, FOSTARD AND DWEEBTARD, [and monetary ignoramuses] never provide any examples...  

You revert to appealing to an imagined audience? Who's the 'tard here?!

btw You just told me to ask a question and I did immediately.
          You did not answer.

There's your **** example, Alzheimer.

FOS » 08 Jun 2022, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jun 2022, 10:31 pm

It seems that an alarming number of people seem to think we actually dwell in a democracy...their vote matters...and the apparent coordination that happens among the elite and the top down enforcement of it is merely an 'emergent phenomenon'.

for people who believe such stuff...i just have a few questions:

1) when 3+journalists write the same nonsense story about ukraine on the same day (say ghost of kiev, snake island, etc)...and it is a story later admitted to be false...how can that not be coordinated?...and how can it not expose an intent to deceive from whoever the conductor is? isnt that similar to seeing musicians in a symphony playing beethoven's 5th and assuming that everything they are doing is random and only appears to be coordinated? Someone must have written that music and someone is conducting.

2) WHen alex jones is banned on the same day...in the same hour...by 5+ social media platforms...(but the ONLY gentile owner, jack dorsey, seems to hesitate but give in shortly after...i think it is an important pattern to notice that he was literally the only social media owner who was not jewish (and he was removed shortly after by a jew...https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/elliot- ... -says.html  who replaced jack with the current CEO) ...how is that not coodrinated from the top down? how can that be organic?

3) When the elites panic over elon musk potentially owning twitter...is it because he isnt 'random' because they are? or is it because he isnt one of them?

4) when an NGO writes a white paper that then becomes legal policy a few months later...is that random? Did the NGO actually persuade politicians that their way is best?

5) why is holocaust education mandatory in the USA but not Iran? Could it be because of the ethnic differences between the elite in Iran vs the elite in the USA?

6) in 1924 (when a racially exclusive immigration policy was passed) the vast majority of US elites where anglo protestants. By 1965 (year of hart cellar) many of those elites had been replaced by immigrant populations especially catholics and jews. Is that random, or was there a power struggle? a struggle indeed that the anglos explicitly attempted to resist (henry ford, madison grant, etc)...the general population was still in 1965 quite 'racist' and opposed to non white immigration in 1965, which is easy to confirm with polls from the day (84% were opposed to non white immigration)...but hart cellar passed anyway...

7) Why is it that corporations comply with woke culture? woke culture is ostensibly anti corporate. indeed if corporations refuse to comply, they can be sued out of existence...it is illegal to not comply.

How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners? 

Just as an aside:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about LEGAL immigration. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to de-racinate white America.

Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost prima facie evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago. 
 
 

LowIQTrash » 25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am

How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners? 

Just as an aside:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about LEGAL immigration. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to de-racinate white America.

Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost prima facie evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago. 
 
 

Old World Traditional ideas govern New World Orders established each generation gap lived to date each alternate reality promising life evolves beyond static ideas demanding humans have rights to believe living exceeds adapting as displaced ancestrally here now.

Typecasting everyone else while performing as a stereotypical social identity saying genetics doesn't eternally separate human intellect like it does homo sapien ancestors living forward now until great great grandchildren stop arriving one at a time replacing the 30 relative DNA donors of previous 4 generation gaps.

LowIQTrash » 25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am

How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners? 

Just as an aside:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about LEGAL immigration. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to de-racinate white America.

Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost prima facie evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago.

The Left in Canada calls their same immigration policies ....."Postnationalism"......Postnationalism or non-nationalism[1] is the process or trend by which nation states and national identities lose their importance relative to cross-nation and self-organized or supranational and global entities as well as local entities. Although postnationalism is not strictly considered the antonym of nationalism, the two terms and their associated assumptions are antithetic as postnationalism is an internationalistic process. There are several factors that contribute to aspects of postnationalism, including economic, political, and cultural elements. Increasing globalization of economic factors (such as the expansion of international trade with raw materials, manufactured goods, and services, and the importance of multinational corporations and internationalization of financial markets) have shifted emphasis from national economies to global ones.At the same time, socio-political power is partially transferred from national authorities to supernational entities, such as multinational corporations, the United Nations, the European Union, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and NATO.
.

 
 

The Rise and Fall of Postnationalism
By Hans-Georg Maaßen and Johannes Eisleben · Friday, September 11, 2020

Share
The Decline of the West

Over the last fifty years, the West has witnessed a continuous decline in the quality of the state and its activities, along with a cultural deterioration of the public sphere. All OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries have also undergone a massive dichotomization of private property ownership: An ever-smaller fraction of the population owns a growing share of all non-public assets. According to some estimates, the richest one percent holds 70 to 80 percent of all global private property, while an increasing number owns nothing and is excluded from decent incomes and the means to live a normal family life.

A major cause of this trend is economic globalization, which has moved low-qualification jobs outside the OECD. While the new working classes in Asia and the global owner elites gained from this development, the lower classes in the West have suffered a net loss from globalization—despite the stable consumer good prices of the last decades. Their exclusion from or marginalization in the value creation chain and the increase in the share of retirees have led to rising absolute and relative public spending. This has been financed to some extent by increased tax revenues, but overall via a rising debt level in almost all OECD countries. However, this spending has to a high degree been allocated to consumption, while education, the legal system, public security, infrastructure, healthcare, and infrastructure have been neglected. The concentration of property within a small elite has been driven by the financial system introduced in the early 1970s, in which the partial bank reserve system was supplemented with a purely fiat money system. This system automatically transfers more property to those who own assets already but has also created the current debt bubble, which is without historical precedent.

At the same time, massive migration into most Western states has taken place, both legally and illegally but tolerated, with some of it, such as in France or the United Kingdom, partially caused by the unraveling of colonial empires. The migration rate has exceeded the rate of assimilation over a long period of time and is now reaching levels comparable to migration into the territory of the Roman Empire in the early Middle Ages. This migration has led to a sequestration and fragmentation of our societies. New groups of migrants unfamiliar with Western values and without knowledge of the norms of modern democratic societies have formed and threaten established society through crime as well as through an overuse of social welfare systems.

Continued......

These tendencies have been accompanied by a new political ideology that questions the foundations of pluralism and democracy. Its main planks are the politics of identity and minority entitlements, the political purging of our language, and the abolition of the right to free speech in universities, schools, and the media, as well as aggressive propaganda calling for so-called “climate protection,” international solidarity, and the acceleration of migration. This ideology is promoted with the help of massive financial support supplied by interested parties and an aggressive multichannel propaganda machinery in which the media, a multitude of NGOs, and politicians participate.

These dire developments, which are unraveling our societies and states, are praised as the greatest examples of progress in freedom, equality, social justice, and solidarity that we have ever experienced, while criticisms from liberals or conservatives in the tradition of Hume, Kant, Burke, Mill, and Hayek are vilified as extremist and fascist or as conspiracy theories. The productive bourgeois elites have yielded to this pressure and assumed a passive, defensive position leading to a further decline in the enforcement of legal and penal norms and the rule of law. Leftist partisans have taken over important positions as judges, college teachers, politicians, media editors, and managers of big corporations.

Causes of the Decline

Open democratic societies and the rule of law were achieved through painful historical struggles to overcome the static, hierarchical societies, centralized power, and low productivity of the agrarian societies of the past. Because of their complexity and recurring lack of stability, free market democracies have always been vulnerable to threats from modern totalitarian states such as communism, fascism, and national socialism. All totalitarian states require constant violence to stay in power and replace the rule of law by despotism.

Since Babeuf, one of the first ideologues to advocate secular, chiliastic political redemption schemes, politicians and intellectuals have often been tempted by the idea of a dictatorship that would enable a radical implementation of a new, just, equal, and ecological world order. These forces pursue the goal of ending the freedom for which our ancestors fought and died as they struggled against feudalism and absolutism. They are the enemies of the open society, but unlike traditional revolutionaries they are currently not perceived as such. Their ranks are formed by teachers of the humanities, journalists, professional politicians, EU and UN bureaucrats, and proponents of economic globalization such as bankers and multinational corporation managers. They share a deep contempt for ordinary, locally rooted people, as well as their ways of life and traditions, which they try to ridicule or even delegalize (such as hunting or meat-eating). Since the 1970s, an ideological collusion and fusion of the former socialist left and economic liberalism has created this ideology, epitomized for example in the later writings of Michel Foucault. The ideology is a space of projection for the chiliastic political hopes of left-wing thinkers, while economic globalists see it as a justification to further optimize the concentration of global property and profits in the hands of a few thousand families preparing to own everything.

Continued.....

The Threat and How We Can Respond

This transition is happening silently, often not yet dawning on the consciousness of most of the citizens of the West. However, many citizens are beginning to sense that what they are facing are not small changes in their living conditions, but that these changes are fundamental and threaten their civil liberties and the Western social systems. What will happen to our democratic societies if we do not stop this development?

We must fear that, at the end of this development, we will find ourselves living in societies that are exactly the opposite of what our ancestors and we ourselves have fought for: undemocratic and totalitarian supranational systems. The socialist and globalist movements appear to be united in striving to do just that. The architects of communism and other totalitarian regimes realized that the transformation of a society into a totalitarian state is so much easier if family and local cohesion are destroyed, if people are uprooted, and if traditions and national cultures are destroyed. The consequence is that people become an anonymous, disintegrated mass that is easily controllable and manipulated. Current developments in Western societies seem to follow this path and make it easier for the enemies of our free democracies to consolidate what are effectively totalitarian structures. Since the 1980s, we are witnessing how ideological indoctrination is replacing the classical education in the humanities departments of our universities.

Yet such societies would be deeply dystopian, incapable of producing prosperity or inner peace. Only nations that are able to live in inner and outer peace are inhabited by free citizens sharing a common culture and living under the rule of law. They benefit from a stable public sphere, democratic participation and representation, decent, non-dichotomic ownership structures, and international trade.

This development toward a new totalitarianism is not inevitable, even if it is already well advanced. Three factors might slow it down or even prevent it:

1. The bursting of the global debt bubble;

2. The chaos of distribution fight in migration societies;

3. An awakening of the bourgeois elites and their will to fight for our open society.

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are witnessing a global supply-and-demand shock affecting all countries, unlike anything seen since the so-called “summerless year” of 1816. This shock is about to prick the global debt bubble and will lead to a massive contraction of the world economy, with negative growth rates as serious as -20 to -30 percent of GDP.

This contraction will trigger material distribution fights among the lower 75 percent of the income pyramid, and it will be most serious for the lowest third. Among these, we find migrants, long-term autochthonous unemployed/non-tax-paying social layers (“white trash”), and victims of crisis-induced downward social mobility; the latter as well as the clans of migrants working in the domain of organized crime (such as the French Chechens or the German Lebanese) have the best organizational ability. The large-scale fights among these groups can call into question the public monopoly on violence to an unprecedented extent.

Both trends—the economic disruption when the bubble bursts and a crisis-induced breakdown of law and order—could awaken the bourgeoisie from its current stupor to become aware of the grave threats to our freedom, property, democracy, and the future of our children. We need to understand what is currently at risk. Interesting times ahead.

https://www.telospress.com/the-rise-and ... tionalism/

 4 years later ....since the writing of this OP and things are only getting worse ......
 

Who do you think that Biden is trying to shake Hands with?

LowIQTrash » 25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am

Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! 


 

Agreed. 
How the even most "enlightened" do not see this pie-in-the-face reality is baffling.

Or worse, if they DO see it, they deem it worth the risk.
Hell, we might be letting the next Einstein creep across the border...

That reminds me of the reason (rationale) the ethical dilemma exists about capital punishment.
We might kill an innocent person and there is no coming back from that horror.
So don't kill anyone ever.

Two sides to the same coin called Illogical Paralysis.

---

Meanwhile, it's okay to rain death on people in other ways. Bombs, drugs, crime wave, whatever.

Mrkelly » 25 Jan 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 8:58 am

Who do you think that Biden is trying to shake Hands with?

They(globalists) have their fingers up the wrinkled puppets *** ....

 

Majik » 25 Jan 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 10:01 am

They(globalists) have their fingers up the wrinkled puppets *** ....

he is very Walter like

[img]blob:295f8202-5653-42b8-8937-9922845fad36[/img]
https://www.jeffdunham.com/wp-content/u ... walter.png

[img]blob:3b6b86db-9d5b-4d93-b34f-d61ccc2ff423[/img]
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/ ... .45-PM.png

 
 

LowIQTrash » 25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 1:40 am

How about the most damning evidence of them all...over the past 40-60 years, all of a sudden Western, primarily white countries opened up their borders and let in millions (tens of millions in the USA) of non-white foreigners? 

Just as an aside:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way, conjob RETARDS, I'm not talking about illegal immigration, I'm talking about LEGAL immigration. There was no popular demand for massive increases in the levels of LEGAL immigration - the illegal immigration problem today is a subset of the whole "program" and if you're just focused on "illegal Mexican invaders" you're missing the point since the entire goal is to de-racinate white America.

Whether it's done "illegally" or legally DOESN'T MATTER you **** idiots! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact that this is all going on across N. America & Europe is almost prima facie evidence that the operation was [[[WELL COORDINATED]]] and ideated EONS ago.

Are you FOS's sok?  Because, how would you even be able to find this necro-thread if you weren't?
 

Majik » 25 Jan 2024, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jan 2024, 10:01 am

They(globalists) have their fingers up the wrinkled puppets *** ....

 

What is the separation of a globalist and a person that doesn't accept humans are one species of separate ancestries that evolved in separate environments at the same time generation gaps change people alive now as only adapting as displaced since conceived to replace those made the conceptions after inception of this species evolving by the numbers here now.

Intellectual longitudes make up 24 time zones, the latitudes between equator and each polar axis is temperate zones with separate food chains in each.

Organic life is evolving by what it eats in categories of plant or animal, predatory or prey ancestral nature, lifetimes arriving asexual, male, female replacements of original arrivals that change population when last generation becomes 1 of 2 parents or not changing previous generations as 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great. and that is where the separation of dominate and recessive genes comes into account.

The 30 previous lifetimes combine into 93.75% chromosomes of last generation gap added and the remaining 6.25% exponentially deceases each generation dating back to inception.

I cannot imagine nobody else ever applied rule of 72 in economics to combined chromosomes per ancestor populating space now keeping any reproduction unique to their cycle of occupying space when, where, what, which whom they were and how and why nobody was ever reproduced twice.

Yet every society demands people believe life exceeds the time genetics gives each reproduction specifically evolving here now. There never was a missing link as proposed by evolution theory, aka Darwinism or theology, mythology suggesting there are intellectual beings without form or shape..

We are being run by non elected Deep state Dem/Liberal assholes. I hope Trump does an Elon and fires 80% the first day.

FOS » 09 Jun 2022, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jun 2022, 6:54 am

i really should just put you on ignore. you never say anything interesting

Pot...meet kettle