Unless you say so...JinnMartini » 10 Jun 2022, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah, you ain't going nowhere, you attention-seeking whore !
No worries . . . he ain't going nowhere !
I have a deal with an old friend.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2022, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I already **** on his avatar and gave him a gay siggy..
Graves are for pissing on...
His problem was thinking that magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists and those of LIKE ilk, could be reasoned with in the FIRST place. I've decided to do my best to IGNORE them.Blackvegetable » 10 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Repeated self inflicted head wounds are a plague around here.
OOOOOOOH
ha ha ha ha defending social narratives competing to be in charge for generations forward from here is conflicting prone because everyone agrees to never agree biology eternally separates reproductions occupying space now.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2022, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody on here is conflict prone. That's bunch of ****. You can't prove it. I dare you to try.
you've all but described yourself as an active pedophile who lives in the Philippians because it's easier to pick up kids there.....who wants to debate a creep like that?DennisTheMenace » 10 Jun 2022, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ It's useless to "try" to debate with a room full of idiots at LFN.
I'm out.
https://youtu.be/Q0ZEmLosVXE
Typical of a leftist to say if you disagree with my political ideology then you must be in league with magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists, etc... and I won't engage because I believe in group identity politics, even though it's nothing more than stereo typical idiocy to put people in categories based on rigid generalizations that are mostly based off prejudice, that apparently they claim they are against.B.See » 11 Jun 2022, 3:30 am » wrote: ↑ His problem was thinking that magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists and those of LIKE ilk, could be reasoned with in the FIRST place. I've decided to do my best to IGNORE them.
Hey, if you're here posting FOR them instead of IN SPITE OF THEM, then you're in the WRONG PLACE.
Never had any problems with that . . .
I'm kidding.
B.See » 11 Jun 2022, 3:30 am » wrote: ↑ His problem was thinking that magats, bigots, racists, women-haters, fascists, nazis, supremacists and those of LIKE ilk, could be reasoned with in the FIRST place. I've decided to do my best to IGNORE them.
Hey, if you're here posting FOR them instead of IN SPITE OF THEM, then you're in the WRONG PLACE.
I GUESS THE PRESSURE WAS JUST TOO MUCHDennisTheMenace » 10 Jun 2022, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ It's useless to "try" to debate with a room full of idiots at LFN.
I'm out.
https://youtu.be/Q0ZEmLosVXE
Hi @DennisTheMenace . . . back already ?