gee, I didn't see that? misery loves company and doubters need constant validation there character is more than being alive now. So they complain about anyone not needing validated by social consensus. anyone able to stand their time instinctively is intellectually ridiculed into submission or faces getting sued in civil court with defamation of character or criminal charge in other wing of double jeopardy loophole in the legal system where a person can face two separate types of charges for same event.sooted up Cyndi » 13 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ He's got a complaining side to his personality. :wave:
omh » 13 Jun 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ gee, I didn't see that? misery loves company and doubters need constant validation there character is more than being alive now. So they complain about anyone not needing validated by social consensus. anyone able to stand their time instinctively is intellectually ridiculed into submission or faces getting sued in civil court with defamation of character or criminal charge in other wing of double jeopardy loophole in the legal system where a person can face two separate types of charges for same event.
Like sending Capone to prison for tax evasion because they(the state) couldn't convict him of murder, rico violations(federal court) so treasury got him on tax evasion. 1 out of three.
Obviously, you're really as brain-dead as the hero you voted for.ScottMon » 13 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ You are having to skip over a lot of facts to arrive at that conspiracy theory. Most states require ID for a ballot, whether or not its mail in or not. Arizona requires a form that must be verified before a mail in ballot can be sent out. So those ballots you see are already verified as legit by the poll office.
The poll office. They verify the name and address BEFORE they send out the ballot. Each ballot mail is verified as it arrives in the system. Have you personally ever talked to a poll worker? They will tell you that everything is buttoned up and secured. Even your Republican poll watchers saw nothing legitimately wrong.Zeets2 » 13 Jun 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Obviously, you're really as brain-dead as the hero you voted for.
WHO VERIFIES THE VOTER'S ID ON A MAIL-IN BALLOT, YOU FOOL?
They you're proving to be the dumbest liberal on the planet! It shows you know only what the DNC puppets on the fake news media tells you gullible fools!ScottMon » 13 Jun 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The poll office. They verify the name and address BEFORE they send out the ballot. Each ballot mail is verified as it arrives in the system.
Key Battleground States Don’t Require Signature-Matching on Mail-in Ballots
10/16/20 by Daniel Payne
Election rules in multiple key battleground states permit voters to submit mail-in and absentee ballots without having their signatures checked to ensure the vote is valid. 5 states that have historically been competitive in presidential races — NC, IA, WI, PA, and NH — do not require signature-matching for mailed voting forms.
MICHIGAN LAWSUIT: “Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity”
11/10/20 by IWB
a. Defendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted.
b. Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.
c. After election officials announced the last absentee ballots had been received, another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and every ballot was counted and attributed only to Dem candidates.
d. Defendants instructed election workers to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.
e. Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1/1/1900.
f. City of Detroit election workers and 4 Great Lakes Justice Center employees coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Dem party. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.
g. Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.
h. Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.
i. After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed.
if the fix was in they wouldn't say anything different to anyone outside their circle boxing everyone else into typecast stereotype people. Defending equal rights isn't protecting equally proportionately alive serving an arbitrary chain of command with power, wealth, and fame going to those directing tomorrow's outcomes arrived today by yesterday's promises kept reality is all that matters.ScottMon » 13 Jun 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The poll office. They verify the name and address BEFORE they send out the ballot. Each ballot mail is verified as it arrives in the system. Have you personally ever talked to a poll worker? They will tell you that everything is buttoned up and secured. Even your Republican poll watchers saw nothing legitimately wrong.
Do you know what the court said about the Michigan lawsuit?Zeets2 » 13 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ They you're proving to be the dumbest liberal on the planet! It shows you know only what the DNC puppets on the fake news media tells you gullible fools!
What did the Michigan Court of Appeals say about ballot fraud?
WHAT THE COURT SAID: "The legislative directive ... requires plaintiff to pursue its fraud allegations by way of a recount of the ballots cast in Wayne County. Because plaintiff failed to follow the clear law in Michigan relative to such matters, their action is moot." — Michigan Court of Appeals panel