Blackvegetable » 11 Jun 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ How many Republicans believe Grifty won the election?
Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Pretty sure keeping a president under a 24/7 cloud of suspicion and constant investigations qualifies as failure to peacefully transition power.
nefarious101 » 11 Jun 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ they are always wrong yet insist they are always right....it's like dealing with 2 year olds
Trump won in 2016, democrats waged a coup against him for 5 years running. Let's not talk about reasonableness.
Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Trump won in 2016, democrats waged a coup against him for 5 years running. Let's not talk about reasonableness.
Trump’s words and actions triggered all of it.Neo » 11 Jun 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Trump won in 2016, democrats waged a coup against him for 5 years running. Let's not talk about reasonableness.
^^^an empty head chimes in.
Biden beat Trump who’s got a brain riddled with syphillis.roadkill » 11 Jun 2022, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ Republicans Don't believe Biden won the election.![]()
Biden couldn't win a race with a one legged man. lol
Pastafarian » 11 Jun 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden beat Trump who’s got a brain riddled with syphillis.
It’s not much but then we are talking about Trump.
You stink of desperation, special needs.
roadkill » 11 Jun 2022, 1:15 am » wrote: ↑ What happens when the public learns about all the exculpatory evidence the dems are leaving out of their J6 orgy?
Cannonpointer » 11 Jun 2022, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Who is going to tell them? Fixed Noise? Not likely. They're false opposition. Oh, they'll let a LITTLE slip, here and there - maybe give Tucker a bit of leash on the topic. But zero full-on oppo, is my bet. No exposé, any more than they gve us any exposé of tranny agenda or the many, MANY lies which utterly debunk anthropogenic climate change.
Fixed Noise serves the same function across from the rest of the MSM that weakling foil, Alan Colmes, used to serve when he was Hannity's whipping boy. They sustain the left's agenda through a weak PRETENSE of opposition, while giving the right the false impression that they are represented. They are a pap for the retard-right
Cannonpointer » 11 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ When is it NOT true?
Can you name one important issue that Fox has gotten right - with all guns blazing, the way the rest of the media pulls out all the stops? I don't mean issues where they DON'T get it WRONG. I mean issues where they genuinely represent the truth- as opposed to giving their viewers just enough to keep them mollified, but not enough to change the minds of the undecided?
Was their support of Trump full-throated? Or did they in fact come around to Trump only because they were hemorrhaging viewers - and **** on him whenever they got the chance?
I think that you and I both know that if Fox did any journeyman level work exposing the fallacies of the man in a dress culture, they'd have shut that **** down - as they have the power do with the J6 ****. Fox pulls punches - because Fox serves the same corporte agenda as CNN. They are not truly opposed to their owners' agendas. They are a pap dispenser, with few exceptions. Tucker is allowed to take a FEW real swats - but with no support or followup. His show is Op/Ed, not news. Their NEWS FORMAT is where an exposé belongs - not an opinion show.
The truth is an absolute scourge to a lie - and Fox is no scourge. It's a weak sister, permitting through weak opposition that which it could prevent through firm and manly opposition. Fox COULD - and does not - blow the lid off of everything. It pulls every punch, to make it LOOK like a fight. It ain't a fight - it's a puppet show.
Tucker comes on first??

Jews.Cannonpointer » 11 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ When is it NOT true?
Can you name one important issue that Fox has gotten right - with all guns blazing, the way the rest of the media pulls out all the stops? I don't mean issues where they DON'T get it WRONG. I mean issues where they genuinely represent the truth- as opposed to giving their viewers just enough to keep them mollified, but not enough to change the minds of the undecided?
Was their support of Trump full-throated? Or did they in fact come around to Trump only because they were hemorrhaging viewers - and **** on him whenever they got the chance?
I think that you and I both know that if Fox did any journeyman level work exposing the fallacies of the man in a dress culture, they'd have shut that **** down - as they have the power do with the J6 ****. Fox pulls punches - because Fox serves the same corporte agenda as CNN. They are not truly opposed to their owners' agendas. They are a pap dispenser, with few exceptions. Tucker is allowed to take a FEW real swats - but with no support or followup. His show is Op/Ed, not news. Their NEWS FORMAT is where an exposé belongs - not an opinion show.
The truth is an absolute scourge to a lie - and Fox is no scourge. It's a weak sister, permitting through weak opposition that which it could prevent through firm and manly opposition. Fox COULD - and does not - blow the lid off of everything. It pulls every punch, to make it LOOK like a fight. It ain't a fight - it's a puppet show.