ANATOMY OF A WELL PLANNED, ORGANIZED INSURRECTION: '1776 Returns' - Reconnaissance Tours, Plans to Gas Lawmakers

User avatar
By B.See
16 Jun 2022 4:03 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 4 5 6 7 8
User avatar
NEILCAR
3 Sep 2022 4:13 am
User avatar
   
717 posts
B.See » 02 Sep 2022, 11:04 pm » wrote: Don't try to put words in my mouth.

I'm saying that given the circumstances I've already described, that have since been revealed, and that are quite apparent in VIDEO EVIDENCE, the officer's actions were warranted. In fact I'd go so far as to say they showed great restraint. More than I believe they WOULD have had that been BLM (for example) breaching the Capitol and storming the halls looking to fkng HANG THE VICE PRESIDENT.

I know that, and so do you.
So, killing an unarmed woman is showing restraint!!! ... I would suggest that you are having a bad day posting and I will just let that go 

At the end of the day, when everyone went home ... No one was hanged

The thing about "intent" is you have to be in someone's head to actually know.  Should you put the accused on the stand and ask them "Did you intend to hang someone?" If they say "no, we were just fooling around" .. you just lost.  You can not prove "intent"
 
User avatar
B.See
3 Sep 2022 5:16 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
NEILCAR » 03 Sep 2022, 4:13 am » wrote: So, killing an unarmed woman is showing restraint!!! ... I would suggest that you are having a bad day posting and I will just let that go 

At the end of the day, when everyone went home ... No one was hanged

The thing about "intent" is you have to be in someone's head to actually know.  Should you put the accused on the stand and ask them "Did you intend to hang someone?" If they say "no, we were just fooling around" .. you just lost.  You can not prove "intent"
Again you are attempting to twist my words and mischaracterize my points. And I don't appreciate it.

I've already pointed out, in several responses, that the FACTS and ACTIONS of the rioters that day, including breaching by force the Capitol, and roaming halls and corridors chanting to hang the Vice President,

as well as other actions WELL DOCUMENTED, were sufficient enough to have caused lawmakers and those whose duty it was to protect THEM, to fear for their lives - even prompting goodbye calls to loved ones. 

I've referenced what was occurring when the rabid mob was at the doors trying to BREAK THROUGH when one of their number was shot.

Frankly given all the above I think it commendable of the vastly outnumber Capitol officers that they HADN'T responded with MORE force. THAT'S the restraint I speak of, champ.

So maybe YOU'RE having a bad day since you seem to be unable (or perhaps UNWILLING) to get the point.

And, like I said, we BOTH know it would've been a completely different scenario had that been BLM instead of organized, right winged terrorists who Trump on national TV told to "stand back and stand by."

Not that they'd have been able to get anywhere NEAR the Capitol if the situation were REVERSED.

Image
 
 
User avatar
NEILCAR
3 Sep 2022 8:57 am
User avatar
   
717 posts
B.See » 03 Sep 2022, 5:16 am » wrote: Again you are attempting to twist my words and mischaracterize my points. And I don't appreciate it.

I've already pointed out, in several responses, that the FACTS and ACTIONS of the rioters that day, including breaching by force the Capitol, and roaming halls and corridors chanting to hang the Vice President,

as well as other actions WELL DOCUMENTED, were sufficient enough to have caused lawmakers and those whose duty it was to protect THEM, to fear for their lives - even prompting goodbye calls to loved ones. 

I've referenced what was occurring when the rabid mob was at the doors trying to BREAK THROUGH when one of their number was shot.

Frankly given all the above I think it commendable of the vastly outnumber Capitol officers that they HADN'T responded with MORE force. THAT'S the restraint I speak of, champ.

So maybe YOU'RE having a bad day since you seem to be unable (or perhaps UNWILLING) to get the point.

And, like I said, we BOTH know it would've been a completely different scenario had that been BLM instead of organized, right winged terrorists who Trump on national TV told to "stand back and stand by."

Not that they'd have been able to get anywhere NEAR the Capitol if the situation were REVERSED.

Image
I am not the one trying to justify killing a unarmed woman... 
User avatar
nuckin futz
3 Sep 2022 9:34 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
GASSING PEOPLE???? C'MON!
Even Hitler didn't approve of that!
But his buddy Musolinni sure did it!
:evil:   :evil:   :evil:  
 
User avatar
B.See
4 Sep 2022 5:24 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
NEILCAR » 03 Sep 2022, 8:57 am » wrote: I am not the one trying to justify killing a unarmed woman...
The unarmed woman was among a packed rabid crowd of rioters who'd just built gallows, beat Capitol police, scaled walls, busted through doors and windows of the nation's Capitol and was in the process of trying to bust down closed doors while storming through hallways looking to hang the Vice President. 

NONE of which YOU think should've caused law enforcement on the other side of those doors to FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES, apparently. 

But a lone unarmed Black man running AWAY after a traffic stop for a broken tail-light, sure, let's shoot THAT mfkr.
 
User avatar
NEILCAR
4 Sep 2022 8:56 am
User avatar
   
717 posts
B.See » 04 Sep 2022, 5:24 am » wrote: The unarmed woman was among a packed rabid crowd of rioters who'd just built gallows, beat Capitol police, scaled walls, busted through doors and windows of the nation's Capitol and was in the process of trying to bust down closed doors while storming through hallways looking to hang the Vice President. 

NONE of which YOU think should've caused law enforcement on the other side of those doors to FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES, apparently. 

But a lone unarmed Black man running AWAY after a traffic stop for a broken tail-light, sure, let's shoot THAT mfkr.
I am on record as wanting the demonstrators to be fully prosecuted fully (destruction of public property, illegal demonstration, trespassing, but not insurrection). 
No one was hanged.
An unarmed woman was shot dead. 
It is true that the dem party was for defunding the police. 
I have never stated I was for police who kill people for no reason. (Black or otherwise).

I would suggest it is you who are putting words in my mouth. 


 
User avatar
B.See
6 Sep 2022 5:35 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
NEILCAR » 04 Sep 2022, 8:56 am » wrote: I am on record as wanting the demonstrators to be fully prosecuted fully (destruction of public property, illegal demonstration, trespassing, but not insurrection). 
No one was hanged.
An unarmed woman was shot dead. 
It is true that the dem party was for defunding the police. 
I have never stated I was for police who kill people for no reason. (Black or otherwise).

I would suggest it is you who are putting words in my mouth.
No one was hanged because they couldn't find the man they wanted to hang. The sought him out, chanted Hang Mike Pence and did so with Trump's blessing.

An unarmed woman among a group of armed trespassers (yes it was confirmed some of them were armed, and Trump wanted metal detectors disabled) trying to break down doors and threatening the lives of those within was shot dead. NO CAPITOL COP WAS CHARGED FOR THEIR ACTIONS THAT DAY, including the shooter.

The entire dem party was never for defunding the police. That's an outright lie. And now TRUMP'S MAGA want to hunt down and KILL the FBI. As well as Biden, last I heard.

You have never CONDEMNED police who kill people for no reason either. I've MULTIPLE posts on the subject. Where is YOUR commentary?

I would suggest it is YOU who are trying to minimize what Trump and his INSURRECTIONISTS tried to do that day. They weren't just peaceful demonstrators. They showed up, for a WELL PLANNED ORGANIZED INSURRECTION - on THAT PARTICULAR DAY, on the basis of a fkng LIE, and for the purpose of stopping the LAWFUL CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT ELECT BY WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
 
User avatar
NEILCAR
6 Sep 2022 7:44 am
User avatar
   
717 posts
B.See » 06 Sep 2022, 5:35 am » wrote: No one was hanged because they couldn't find the man they wanted to hang. The sought him out, chanted Hang Mike Pence and did so with Trump's blessing.


I would suggest it is YOU who are trying to minimize what Trump and his INSURRECTIONISTS tried to do that day. They weren't just peaceful demonstrators. They showed up, for a WELL PLANNED ORGANIZED INSURRECTION - on THAT PARTICULAR DAY, on the basis of a fkng LIE, and for the purpose of stopping the LAWFUL CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT ELECT BY WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
The actual charge would be "seditious conspiracy" and is almost impossible to prove.  Which is the main reason hilary is walking around. lol 

The progressive left has been yelling defund the police to anyone who will listen.  Dem mayors across the Nation have been doing the same and actually doing the defunding.  Biden (on several occasions) have stood with the "defund the police" movement and stated that they are doing a great job.  Heck the Dem platform has written in its language targeting police for change.
,,,  Bernie Saunders, Kamala, AOC, Kristene Gillibrand, Maxine Waters, Mazine Hiro, Barbara Lee ... the list goes on and on of dem supporting "defund the police".
No, we are looking at a dem party running away from an issue as fast as they can lol ... 
 
User avatar
B.See
6 Sep 2022 7:57 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
NEILCAR » 06 Sep 2022, 7:44 am » wrote: The actual charge would be "seditious conspiracy" and is almost impossible to prove.  Which is the main reason hilary is walking around. lol 

The progressive left has been yelling defund the police to anyone who will listen.  Dem mayors across the Nation have been doing the same and actually doing the defunding.  Biden (on several occasions) have stood with the "defund the police" movement and stated that they are doing a great job.  Heck the Dem platform has written in its language targeting police for change.
,,,  Bernie Saunders, Kamala, AOC, Kristene Gillibrand, Maxine Waters, Mazine Hiro, Barbara Lee ... the list goes on and on of dem supporting "defund the police".
No, we are looking at a dem party running away from an issue as fast as they can lol ...
The left isn't entirely comprised of progressives. And it wasn't Democrats beating Capitol police on January 6 nor is it Democrats who are threatening law enforcement and advocating removals, executions, and hangings of the FBI.

Funny how "blue lives" no longer matter when FASCISTS can't have it THEIR WAY.

FBI Facing ‘Unprecedented’ MAGA Threats After Trump Mar-a-Lago Raid
 
User avatar
NEILCAR
6 Sep 2022 10:07 am
User avatar
   
717 posts
B.See » 06 Sep 2022, 7:57 am » wrote: The left isn't entirely comprised of progressives. And it wasn't Democrats beating Capitol police on January 6 nor is it Democrats who are threatening law enforcement and advocating removals, executions, and hangings of the FBI.

Funny how "blue lives" no longer matter when FASCISTS can't have it THEIR WAY.

FBI Facing ‘Unprecedented’ MAGA Threats After Trump Mar-a-Lago Raid
well, the enrire dem party is running away from defund the police faster than a turkey on Thanksgiving. lol Kind of odd for a party you allege supported the police all of the time and never defunded it at all ... lol 
... One might suggest you are re-writing history.

I can't speak the entire GOP, but most of us have always stood for law and order, that issue has never been in doubt.


 
User avatar
B.See
6 Sep 2022 7:55 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
3,714 posts
NEILCAR » 06 Sep 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: well, the enrire dem party is running away from defund the police faster than a turkey on Thanksgiving. lol Kind of odd for a party you allege supported the police all of the time and never defunded it at all ... lol 
... One might suggest you are re-writing history.

I can't speak the entire GOP, but most of us have always stood for law and order, that issue has never been in doubt.
Again you resort to a disingenuous attempt to twist and distort what I've said. I SAID NOT EVERY DEMOCRAT SUPPORTED THE NOTION OF DEFUNDING THE POLICE.  That's not a "rewrite" champ. That's a FACT.

Certainly I'VE never supported the notion. And contrary to the typical reich winged propaganda that YOU seem to have fallen victim to:

Democrats, at least at the federal level, have been the ones funding the police.

Even the Squad Is More Pro Police Than These Repubicans - The Washington Post


So, you "can't speak for the entire GOP" but you presume to speak for all of US??  What a SURPRISE.
1 4 5 6 7 8

Who is online

In total there are 2997 users online :: 15 registered, 16 bots, and 2966 guests
Bots: LCC, MQQBrowser, MicroMessenger, YandexBot, Nutch, ADmantX, CriteoBot, okhttp, proximic, Googlebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Applebot, Baiduspider
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search