Seriously. Where the **** do you retards come from? There has to be a factory in a warehouse somewhere that just manufactures you morons around the clock.razoo » 16 Jun 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Bullet was invented in 1847. Second Amendment is from 1789. Thus the second amendment only applies to Muskets.
Verbal, please....
You wanna see "moron"?Vegas » 17 Jun 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Seriously. Where the **** do you retards come from? There has to be a factory in a warehouse somewhere that just manufactures you morons around the clock.
Doubtful. And, here is why I say that. You are a highly presumptuous person. You have no idea what my skill set is. Yet, you assume that because you have had some martial arts training, that no one else does. My guess is that your training was never very rigorous or intense, and I am not just being presumptuous. I say this because if you had actually spared with a lot of people, then you would come to know that you can never judge a person's ability to fight just by looking at them or conversing with them. You will know their strengths and weaknesses only by fighting them - there is no substitute. There is no guessing.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ I did TKD.
My odds of survival are better than yours.
If you understand what you have read on this topic we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Sheilagh,Huey » 17 Jun 2022, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Your other talking point statements aside can you provide a link where it is not designed for accuracy?
Ps. I just gave you numerous civilian purposes for that style of semi automatics.
Verbal,Huey » 17 Jun 2022, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ If you understand what you have read on this topic we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
That is funny coming from you. But I am glad you came to this thread. You are providing laughs for a few of us.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ Sheilagh,
You should read the CITATIONS to which you've been linked. They are far more edifying than the **** you puke up.
So do I. 1st dan ITF.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ I did TKD.
My odds of survival are better than yours.
Keep in mind the range does not refer or indicate the power of the bullet at that range. There is a trade off of range to power with the only possible exception being the 50 CAL.But, for the most part, the AR 15 is a very accurate rifle when used properly and within it’s effective range.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Hunting what?
It isn't designed to be accurate.
The ammo is designed to render flesh inedible.
Why don't you **** deviants get real for a minute...
I got tore up by a little dude at a competition. I was too full of myself.Skans » 17 Jun 2022, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Doubtful. And, here is why I say that. You are a highly presumptuous person. You have no idea what my skill set is. Yet, you assume that because you have had some martial arts training, that no one else does. My guess is that your training was never very rigorous or intense, and I am not just being presumptuous. I say this because if you had actually spared with a lot of people, then you would come to know that you can never judge a person's ability to fight just by looking at them or conversing with them. You will know their strengths and weaknesses only by fighting them - there is no substitute. There is no guessing.
5.56 can be extremely accurate. And, a precision built AR is capable of sub-1 MOA accuracy.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Hunting what?
It isn't designed to be accurate.
The ammo is designed to render flesh inedible.
Why don't you **** deviants get real for a minute...
Back in the 80s I had no issues hitting the 300 meter target on qualification day.Skans » 17 Jun 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ 5.56 can be extremely accurate. And, a precision built AR is capable of sub-1 MOA accuracy.
In fact, I happen to have a bolt action rifle chambered in 5.56/.223. 5.56 does not render flesh inedible. Where do you get this crap from? 5.56/.223 can be used to take smaller deer, pigs, wolves, coyotes, etc. Why do you think Remington made .223 bolt action rifles? For military use???
Never heard that .226 rounds make flesh inedible, sounds like an ammophobic claim. I can keep a quarter sized grouping at 50 yards, seems pretty accurate to me.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Hunting what?
It isn't designed to be accurate.
The ammo is designed to render flesh inedible.
Why don't you **** deviants get real for a minute...
Through a peep sight a man sized target looks like a speck of black pepper....it really is amazing when you stop to think how we take that standard of accuracy for granted.Huey » 17 Jun 2022, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Back in the 80s I had no issues hitting the 300 meter target on qualification day.
All that info has already been posted for him elsewhere but he refuses to acknowledge facts.
it has civic duty purpose. Civic Duty is by any means necessary to preserve ideas going forward as all anyone needs to know to protect humanities from humans discovering how they were manipulated since dawn of civilization by context and power of suggestion along with public executions of people standing their time honestly. .Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ It isn't effective for "home defense"
It is SPECIFICALLY developed to compensate for human inability.
It is NOT designed for accuracy.
It has NO civilian "purpose".
It is available exclusively because arms manufacturers want more unit sales.
ScottMon » 17 Jun 2022, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ There's always an uptick in gun sales after a mass shooting.
yeah. With iron sights today I would be lucky to be within three feet of the 300 meter target. Last time I was on a military range with an M16 A2 was in 92GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jun 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Through a peep sight a man sized target looks like a speck of black pepper....it really is amazing when you stop to think how we take that standard of accuracy for granted.