Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:15 am

Post a few of Madison's comments on assault rifles.

You mean semiautomatic rifles that look scary to you.  I have posted his ACTIONS concerning arming the avg citizen with repeating rifles

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:16 am

And you will….

No...YOU will.

Your Stupid is inexhaustible. 
 

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:16 am

And you will….

On and on is Bv's middle name.     

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:18 am

You mean semiautomatic rifles that look scary to you.  I have posted his ACTIONS concerning arming the avg citizen with repeating rifles

No, I don't. 

I mean "assault rifles".

Now get on with it.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:18 am

No...YOU will.

Your Stupid is inexhaustible.

BOOOM!  Meltdowm Mary is in the house!

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:20 am

BOOOM!  Meltdowm Mary is in the house!

We heard you coming.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:19 am

No, I don't. 

I mean "assault rifles".

Now get on with it.

Oh, the automatic weapons the military uses.  He said nothing. They weren’t around. He probably would have said what a great idea and invested government money in their production as he did with repeating rifles,

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:21 am

Oh, the automatic weapons the military uses.  He said nothing. They weren’t around. He probably would have said what a great idea and invested government money in their production as he did with repeating rifles,

I mean "assault rifles".

I can't put it more plainly.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:24 am

I mean "assault rifles".

I can't put it more plainly.

Yes, defined as:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle#Definition

 
 

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:29 am

Yes, defined as:The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle, examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault rifles according to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle#Definition

How many AR15 designs are there?

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:33 am

How many AR15 designs are there?

Many.  But you have a thread that explains that too you.

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:37 am

Many.  But you have a thread that explains that too you.

That is false.

Assuming, of course, that these are your words, everywherethatI'mnot

You are absolutely correct there is only one design for the AR 15.  

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:42 am

That is false.

Assuming, of course, that these are your words, everywherethatI'mnot

Well, in your world there are many.   There is only one AR 15 design (well a couple anyway) that became an assault weapon under the definition  I gave you.

There are many AR 15 designs that are semi automatics and not assault rifles by the definitions  I gave you.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:13 am

Is there more convincing evidence of your assertion than you, 

@Huey   
@Vegas  
@roadkill  
@Zeets2 
@Buffalo  

I could go on....and on.

no you couldn't...you're a dickhead....you couldn't go on and on if your life depended on it.

nefarious101 » 18 Jun 2022, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:53 am

no you couldn't...you're a dickhead....you couldn't go on and on if your life depended on it.

He can go on and on saying the same repetitive **** over and over.

Vegas » 18 Jun 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:54 am

He can go on and on saying the same repetitive **** over and over.

Pure Progressive Idiocrat


Idiocrat
Someone who seems like a character from the movie Idiocracy. Someone who's mean & stupid.

Whats the difference between idiot & idiocrat?

Idiots are/can be mature, nice, generous, respect smart people, & be intelligent in other areas.

Idiocrats are immature, mean, selfish, & have no respect for smart or logical people.

An idiocrat is someone with the brain of a 12 year old gangster with a forrest gump iq, thinks all smart people are ***, easily develops a pack mentality around other idiots, never uses logic, is an asshole, only laughs at the crudest humor, etc.

I can tolerate stupid people that are nice & mean people that are smart, but I have no patience with idiocrats.
 
 

Huey » 18 Jun 2022, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:46 am

Well, in your world there are many.   There is only one AR 15 design (well a couple anyway) that became an assault weapon under the definition  I gave you.

There are many AR 15 designs that are semi automatics and not assault rifles by the definitions  I gave you.

No..

I told you there is only one.

The citations ALL agree there is only one.

You declared there is only one.

You're a **** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 9:57 am

No..

I told you there is only one.

The citations ALL agree there is only one.

You declared there is only one.

You're a **** moron.

For the M16, there were a couple.

I’m gonna bump a question for you.  An honest answer from you will end this discussion.

razoo » 16 Jun 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2022, 10:19 am

Bullet was invented in 1847. Second Amendment is from 1789. Thus the second amendment only applies to Muskets.

If that were the case, then give us your authoritative explanation as to how the 1st Amendment can also apply to freedom of speech over the internet?  Or is it that the Founding Fathers anticipated that earth-changing creation, yet they couldn't conceive of how the musket could possibly be improved upon?

Show some consistency, fool!   
 

ScottMon » 18 Jun 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2022, 7:54 am

You are by far, One of the most reasonable human beings I've ever met on a web forum.

I appreciate that!