Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ And since when is your word not good enough, right?
No questions, dick sucker.
And with that, the dick sucker beevee shut his cock intake.GeorgeWashington » 18 Jun 2022, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑The ENTIRE 2nd.Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑The ENTIRE 2nd, or just the part Ammosexuals see?GeorgeWashington » 18 Jun 2022, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ That may be true, but it does serve the purpose for which the second amendment was written
The militia was called from/comprised of arms bearing civilians.
There was no militia without the bearing of arms among the civilians.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Is there more convincing evidence of your assertion than you,
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ Post a few of Madison's comments on assault rifles.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ I mean "assault rifles".
I can't put it more plainly.
ScottMon » 18 Jun 2022, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ You are by far, One of the most reasonable human beings I've ever met on a web forum.
You are relying on personal knowledge and he is ideologcally driven and hoogle-powered (Hoogle = Hasty Google).Spartan » 18 Jun 2022, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑Hunting: the AR is infinitely configurable in different calibers and configurations, from defense to hunting. A 6.8 SPC chambered AR is an excellent tool for whitetail or muledeer.Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Hunting what?
It isn't designed to be accurate.
The ammo is designed to render flesh inedible.
Why don't you **** deviants get real for a minute...
Not accurate? Most will shoot MOA or better.
Ammo selection for the task at hand is important. There isn't just one round for the AR; you can tailor what you need through ammo selection.
Talk about someone who needs to "get real"!
You're setting a bad example. tsk tsk.
As far as personal knowledge he has als been given links. He isn’t ideologically driven. He just want to be have an argument. And he also can not when he is wrong.Cannonpointer » 20 Jun 2022, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You are relying on personal knowledge and he is ideologcally driven and hoogle-powered (Hoogle = Hasty Google).
Also, he's a loser and a dick sucker whose preference runs toward the dark meat. Just try to IMAGINE being stupid enough to post, "It (a **** rifle, with a rifled barrel, that someone bothered to - you know... **** RIFLE) isn't designed to be accurate." My brain is not big enough to conceive being that small.
Hey, queer?
The purpose of RIFLING is to improve accuracy, and the RIFLE you are saying is not designed for accurcy is, by dint of its name, designed for accuracy.In firearms, rifling is machining helical grooves into the internal (bore) surface of a gun's barrelfor the purpose of exerting torque and thus imparting a spin to a projectile around its longitudinal axis during shooting to stabilize the projectile longitudinally by conservation of angular momentum, improving its aerodynamic stability and accuracy over smooth bore designs.
Even most rainbow flaggers would be embarrassed at the easy elegance of that bitch slap.Spartan » 18 Jun 2022, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑Self-defense IS a civilian purpose, regardless of what an uneducated individual like you might think.
Come and get me, coppah!Spartan » 18 Jun 2022, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Credible citations?? Dude, if you knew ANYTHING about firearms you'd know what an idiot you sound like.
I've got thirty years of experience as a firearms instructor and law enforcement officer.
The humanity!Spartan » 18 Jun 2022, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑I've forgotten more about guns than you're ever going to know. Your ignorance is offensive, and you're a **** prick who doesn't know his own asshole from a hole in the ground. If you gun banners had a legitimate argument to make you wouldn't have to lie or resort to incessant false hyperbole to push it.
Go **** yourself with a chainsaw.
Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2022, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No...I'm talking about citations...
Not some dude on youtube compensating for chronic ED.
BWAHAHAHA!!!!