Liberal Forum

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:18 am

I sent you the answer in a pm, and it took 4 pm's to explain it due to the length. I told you, it's not easy. 

So, you know the answer now, but I doubt you will read it... :-)

Please don't be a whining malcontent... :-)

Oh, I read it... it took me a while to see if it made sense but it does, it made my head hurt... lol... but that is the way to figure out if it's heavier or lighter.. .congratulations, you proved me wrong....

And I won't tell but @Cannonpointer  and @Deezer Shoove  will be glad to know that there is indeed a solution... or maybe not... lol...

 

 
 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:41 am

No i didn't. That's part of the puzzle. Which one is different, and is it lighter, or heaver? 

hey, where is your critical thinking skills at. when reaching the 3x3 point the lighter or heavier is where that is determined because when 6x6 eliminated 6 marbles having same weight. so when put into 3x3, 3 will be same weight as the first 6 and last three have the lighter or heavier.

Murphy's law, when odds are 50/50 there is a 90% chance of picking the wrong side. Back to the op is a simple intellectual diversion of living only limited to being alive now.

time is stationary, evolving is perpetual motion changing total sum forward now as being here. one is part of remaining eternally separated in current shape and form, evolving as displaced equally timed apart here.

space is distance between evolving results. time is they exist in series parallel displacement inorganically universally here galactically, solar system, planetary, genetically plant, animal, predator, prey, male, female, asexual replacement between inception of ancestral lineage to extinction of ancestral chain of events so far.

Adapt or become extinct. Everything navigates time only evolving now in the cycle of their displacement currently occupying the moment here regardless universal geographical area residing.

omh » 27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am

hey, where is your critical thinking skills at. when reaching the 3x3 point the lighter or heavier is where that is determined because when 6x6 eliminated 6 marbles having same weight. so when put into 3x3, 3 will be same weight as the first 6 and last three have the lighter or heavier.

Murphy's law, when odds are 50/50 there is a 90% of picking the wrong side. Back to the op is a simple intellectual diversion of living only limited to being alive now.

There should never be 3x3 weightings. I've already given hints that it's 4x4, then 4x4, then 1x1. That's the sequence. The puzzle is how to do it. And you need to move marbles around on the 2nd and 3rd turn, using your control marbles. 
 
 

Jantje_Smit » 27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am

Oh, I read it... it took me a while to see if it made sense but it does, it made my head hurt... lol... but that is the way to figure out if it's heavier or lighter.. .congratulations, you proved me wrong....

And I won't tell but @Cannonpointer  and @Deezer Shoove  will be glad to know that there is indeed a solution... or maybe not... lol...

I hate typing contests in general.
This puzzle takes more to explain it than little graphics from a Highlights Magazine would.   
I keep ending up needing a "last weigh".

I have two balls and don't know which is heavier. Worse than an exam at the doctor's office.
 

Jantje_Smit » 27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:49 am

Oh, I read it... it took me a while to see if it made sense but it does, it made my head hurt... lol... but that is the way to figure out if it's heavier or lighter.. .congratulations, you proved me wrong....

And I won't tell but @Cannonpointer  and @Deezer Shoove  will be glad to know that there is indeed a solution... or maybe not... lol...

I'm glad you're happy, you owe me a beer! 

It gave me a headache arguing with you! :-)
 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:53 am

There should never be 3x3 weightings. I've already given hints that it's 4x4, then 4x4, then 1x1. That's the sequence. The puzzle is how to do it. And you need to move marbles around on the 2nd and 3rd turn, using your control marbles. 
 
 

Your hints ignore perpetual balancing limits evolving as mutually here. Your logic is playing 0-9 vs 1-10 semantics. All you have done was create a mathematic social truth about comparing parts of the whole against the whole itself.

Now there is figurative logic/ objective truth using a decimal point between 1-10 and 0-9.

literal truth about topics in existential sentences separating total sum dissected into individually here.

relative truth is ancestral displacement occupying space now.

social truth, humanity educates denying now is eternity to every great great grandchild added as they are trained to believe nobody knows how to navigate space occupying time now..

omh » 27 Aug 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:00 am

Your hints ignore perpetual balancing limits evolving as mutually here. Your logic is playing 0-9 vs 1-10 semantics.

No, it's not. 

DeezerShoove » 27 Aug 2022, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:56 am

I hate typing contests in general.
This puzzle takes more to explain it than little graphics from a Highlights Magazine would.   
I keep ending up needing a "last weigh".

I have two balls and don't know which is heavier. Worse than an exam at the doctor's office.

Well one ball is going to be heavier than the other ball. 

How do you tell when they're in the same sack? 

You have to go float in a pool, and have a mate with a waterproof scale, weigh your nuts.

It's a lot of work for very little information.

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:03 am

No, it's not. 

Don't play self deception with me. I escaped that hope, faith, charity methodology in 1982. I stayed silent until 2005. july 15, 2006 I vowed to debunk humanity.

omh » 27 Aug 2022, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:10 am

Don't play self deception with me. I escaped that hope, faith, charity methodology in 1982. I stayed silent until 2005. july 15, 2006 I vowed to debunk humanity.

I love you bro! But I have no idea what you're talking about right now! But that's ok! Keep going! I have no idea what I'm talking about right now either! :-)

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:07 am

Well one ball is going to be heavier than the other ball. 

How do you tell when they're in the same sack?

One last weigh with them separated from each other. Which is not available.

I'm sure this is a sorting problem where logic has pointed out that only certain balls were ever on the heavier side.
In the midst of moving 3 around, keeping track, etc. logic has determined the single ball.
Not a separate weighing.

I'm just lazy.   
 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:12 am

I love you bro! But I have no idea what you're talking about right now! But that's ok! Keep going! I have no idea what I'm talking about right now either! :-)

I am apathetic to emotional language arts. stuff your phony compassion. Behavioral patterns define who you rather be than all you ever were since conceived.

Follow power of suggesting what else is possible by chain of command interpretation of humanity's greater good scenarios to discover what never was going to happen in any society created serving reasonable doubt now is eternity.

DeezerShoove » 27 Aug 2022, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:14 am

One last weigh with them separated from each other. Which is not available.

I'm sure this is a sorting problem where logic has pointed out that only certain balls were ever on the heavier side.
In the midst of moving 3 around, keeping track, etc. logic has determined the single ball.
Not a separate weighing.

I'm just lazy. 

Well, I only have two balls to weigh. You can mess around with them as you wish. 

But if you're talking about marbles, there's 12 of them to figure out. And in that case, stop playing with my balls. 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 6:58 am

I'm glad you're happy, you owe me a beer! 

It gave me a headache arguing with you! :-)

I'm not sure I'm happy... lol... oh, I'm happy to know the solution and it's good to be proven wrong.. from time to time... but it's scary to think that there are people who can come up with puzzles like that... that takes a twisted mind...

But at least the headaches are over... and it's nice to know I'm not the only one who had them...

 

 
 

omh » 27 Aug 2022, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:16 am

I am apathetic to emotional language arts. stuff your phony compassion. Behavioral patterns define who you rather be than all you ever were since conceived.

Follow power of suggesting what else is possible by chain of command interpretation of humanity's greater good scenarios to discover what never was going to happen in any society created serving reasonable doubt now is eternity.

Well, I don't have phony compassion, i always respect your posts and your intelligence. I actually understand them sometimes. 

 
 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:19 am

Well, I only have two balls to weigh. You can mess around with them as you wish. 

But if you're talking about marbles, there's 12 of them to figure out. And in that case, stop playing with my balls. 

Brain teasers and mind games creating the optics and interpretations nobody ancestrally knew how real life evolves as one of a kind here now and serving humanity is only way to socially generate collective better tomorrows now.

Pretend one isn't self evidently evolving in series parallel space as timed apart here. Your character lacks instinctive sense of proportion.

Jantje_Smit » 27 Aug 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:23 am

I'm not sure I'm happy... lol... oh, I'm happy to know the solution and it's good to be proven wrong.. from time to time... but it's scary to think that there are people who can come up with puzzles like that... that takes a twisted mind...

But at least the headaches are over... and it's nice to know I'm not the only one who had them...

It's cool! I'm going to have a beer right now, in your honor! 

I don't know if you drink or not, but have a glass of water then, just for me. :-)

 

RunningWithScissors » 27 Aug 2022, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:24 am

Well, I don't have phony compassion, i always respect your posts and your intelligence. I actually understand them sometimes. 

 
 

guess again. You serve ideas without any desire to rescue the species from its own practice of denying now is eternity as ancestrally practiced following rule of law be it political or spiritual command both using economic theories to manifest loyalty to a royal we say so or else predicament situation of damned if one doesn't pick a side and damned by all other sides not choosing theirs.

omh » 27 Aug 2022, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

27 Aug 2022, 7:29 am

guess again. You serve ideas without any desire to rescue the species from its own practice of denying now is eternity as ancestrally practiced following rule of law be it political or spiritual command both using economic theories to manifest loyalty to a royal we say so or else predicament situation of damned if one doesn't pick a side and damned by all other sides not choosing theirs.

Dude, learn a period. 

And then we can discuss. 


I serve up a lot of ideas, to rescue humanity from the dire fate it is facing. Break your thoughts into separate sentences.