Challenging Puzzles - Anyone Here Into This???

User avatar
By Skans
16 Jun 2022 10:28 am in The Water Cooler Chat Room
1 10 11 12 13 14
User avatar
RunningWithScissors
2 Sep 2022 2:06 am
User avatar
   
1,186 posts
****, stuff was going on 12,000 years ago that we cannot explain, or are not willing to explain.
User avatar
Jantje_Smit
2 Sep 2022 2:35 am
User avatar
      
6,038 posts
RunningWithScissors » 02 Sep 2022, 12:57 am » wrote: That could very well be as well! I'm down with that. I can argue all day about the pyramids, but the Sphinx has the watermarks to prove it. I mean, you can't argue that.... It's at least 12,000 years old. 

And then we get into Göbekli Tepe which is also at least 12k years old... Jericho, same age... 

And other things that point to 10,000 BC or more, and you have to let go of modern ideas of human history and development. 

Am I wrong?
Oh, you're not wrong... I saw a documentary about that once... the head of the Sphinx is too small for its body, it originally had the head of a lion and it was pointed at the constellation of Leo... some 12k years ago... the only thing the Egyptians did was recarve the head so the pharao could have an ego trip... also, Atlantis was located on Antartica, which was much farther north at the time, the weight of all the ice during the last ice age caused the entire crust of the earth to shift and Antartica ended up on the south pole... that also caused the great biblical flood and made all the glaciers melt because they were much further south now...fascinating stuff...

:faint:  

Image
 
 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
User avatar
31st Arrival
2 Sep 2022 7:08 am
User avatar
      
24,752 posts
RunningWithScissors » 02 Sep 2022, 12:57 am » wrote: That could very well be as well! I'm down with that. I can argue all day about the pyramids, but the Sphinx has the watermarks to prove it. I mean, you can't argue that.... It's at least 12,000 years old. 

And then we get into Göbekli Tepe which is also at least 12k years old... Jericho, same age... 

And other things that point to 10,000 BC or more, and you have to let go of modern ideas of human history and development. 

Am I wrong? 
Just inaccurate because of incomplete comprehension of how living actually evolves in plain sight. There aren't missing links to evolving numbers present. Just species that became extinct because they aren't reproducing anymore while the ones left here, are.
1 10 11 12 13 14

Who is online

In total there are 1133 users online :: 18 registered, 19 bots, and 1096 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, Pinterest, oBot, CriteoBot, DuckDuckBot, app.hypefactors.com, DuckDuckGo, proximic, ADmantX, TTD-Content, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, curl/7, BLEXBot, bingbot
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum