Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 9:40 am

They are.

https://time.com/6133336/jan-6-capitol- ... sentences/

You're Vegas class stupid.

Your link refutes you, retard.

Only around a quarter of those arrested—185 individuals—have received criminal sentences, while the rest are waiting for their trials or haven’t yet reached plea agreements.

You FINALLY try to respond pertinently to an OP, and you **** it up.

You should go back to asking questions, dick sucker. 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 10:01 am

What, exactly, is your concern now?

No questions, dick sucker. 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 10:51 am

Why hasn't this abortion of a thread been euthanized?

No questions, dick sucker. 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2022, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 10:46 pm

No questions, dick sucker.

I remember a loooong time ago, you told me I wasn't asking an "honest question".
At the moment I said, "How can a question not be honest? It's a question, not a statement."
I recollect it was a teachable moment for me because I had to think about whether or not it was.

You said that it's a question to which I already knew the answer but was not willing to put forth that answer.
Not technically a rhetorical question which is asked in good faith as the answer is obvious to all.

BlaVe does this so much he doesn't know how cowardly and passive-aggressive it is.
It's just his hard-wired self: cowardly and passive-aggressive.

DeezerShoove » 22 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm

I remember a loooong time ago, you told me I wasn't asking an "honest question".
At the moment I said, "How can a question not be honest? It's a question, not a statement."
I recollect it was a teachable moment for me because I had to think about whether or not it was.

You said that it's a question to which I already knew the answer but was not willing to put forth that answer.
Not technically a rhetorical question which is asked in good faith as the answer is obvious to all.

BlaVe does this so much he doesn't know how cowardly and passive-aggressive it is.
It's just his hard-wired self: cowardly and passive-aggressive.

Funny story - I cannot remember who it was, but someone on this board once took great umbrage at my suggestion that a question could be dishonest. I'm 90% sure it was @Vegas  . He was quite miffed at the very suggestion that a QUESTION could be dishonest. He insisted that the very concept was ludicrous on its face. He went on a good bit about it, in a rather adamant manner - really took me to task in a rant spanning several paragraphs.

Then I asked him if he had stopped beating his wife, and if his mother knew about him being queer. He was like, "Oh. Yeah - I see..."

Every question contains a statement implicit in the asking. I challenge all and sundry to pose a question from the infinite number of questions available in the universe which disproves that claim. 

My favorite question of all time is, "How come my Uncle Delford's asshole smells like dog dick?"Quite a number of lovely implicit statements in that question. It's the question that I always ask after my hand shoots up when some dick head intones, "There are no bad questions." And it's always ME that has to go see H.R. - never the **** that baited me. He gets to keep on telling that lie, and I have to look for work. 

Another great one is, "How come the girls are always prettier in the parking lot than they are in my trunk?" I had one guy supply the answer right off the top of his head: "Better lighting, less bruising." I knew right  away that he and I could work together. When THAT guy said, "There are no bad questions," he backed that **** up - not like those pussies that send ya to H.R.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 22 Jun 2022, 10:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 10:45 pm

Your link refutes you, retard.

You FINALLY try to respond pertinently to an OP, and you **** it up.

You should go back to asking questions, dick sucker.

you should go back to sucking dick.

DeplorablePatriot » 22 Jun 2022, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 8:56 pm

How's prosperity fairing under Brandon? Ooops...It's not. It's floundering, along with everything else, you cock holster.

Y'know...these **** act like the **** universe owes them prosperity.  Built in to the American character...

Puritainism...nobody's as holy as us, we got god on our side.  
Utopianism...everywhere else on earth is ****.
Individualism...I got mine, you can go **** yourself.

Of course...the conjobs need somebody to blame whenever the bottoms falls out, none of it is actually any of their responsibility.  So it's pointing their trusty gnarly stink finger of blame at somebody...and it's always expressed politically.  When one believes that there is some **** god on their side and it's not going so good...with the conjobs it's always the buck stopping over there somewhere, where the black folks hang out.

The way this country was founded, on genocide, slavery, puritanism, utopianism, individualism and with the self-absorbed Manifest Destiny cherry on top...it was pre-ordained that it would end up in the catastrophe we got now.

DeplorablePatriot » 22 Jun 2022, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 8:56 pm

How's prosperity fairing under Brandon? Ooops...It's not. It's floundering, along with everything else, you cock holster.

8 million more Americans are working.

That's a whole lot more than we gained, in aggregate, from the last 3 GOP administrations.

ScottMon » 22 Jun 2022, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2022, 9:59 pm

Sedition and high treason for one thing.

And who among those arrested for the Jan. 6th riot has been found guilty or even charged with treason?

Sorry jerkoff!  You DON'T get to accuse someone is guilty of a crime and then refuse to charge them with it.
Most have been charged with nothing more than a misdemeanor, despite your desire to have them put to death. 
 

Zeets2 » 23 Jun 2022, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:32 am

And who among those arrested for the Jan. 6th riot has been found guilty or even charged with treason?

Sorry jerkoff!  You DON'T get to accuse someone is guilty of a crime and then refuse to charge them with it.
Most have been charged with nothing more than a misdemeanor, despite your desire to have them put to death.

Exactly. The dems must try and destroy Trump because there's been way to many high level gov. officials that have lied to the world.

roadkill » 23 Jun 2022, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:41 am

Exactly. The dems must try and destroy Trump because there's been way to many high level gov. officials that have lied to the world.

Absolutely!  And they all know that if Trump runs again he'll beat them easily after the mess Biden has made of this country, and they'll be prosecuted for their many crimes!
Being exposed as the criminals they are is their biggest fear, and they're certain that a second Trump term will do that!

What else could have possibly evoke this kind of fear in liberals like Crooked Hillary?:

 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jun 2022, 10:46 am

At least one is implicated.

Liberal law professor Jonathan Turley explains that the J6 hearing is biased.

"Jan 6 committee not 'aggressively pursuing' Capitol personnel decisions during riot: Jonathan Turley"

https://www.foxnews.com/media/jan-6-com ... han-turley
 
 

Zeets2 » 23 Jun 2022, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:32 am

And who among those arrested for the Jan. 6th riot has been found guilty or even charged with treason?

Sorry jerkoff!  You DON'T get to accuse someone is guilty of a crime and then refuse to charge them with it.

Sorry wanker...but you obviously don't even know what treason is.  It's a very specific charge in a very specific situation.  Under US law treason is the act of providing aid and comfort to the enemy or making surreptitious contact with other governments in time of war.   Under US law, the country has to be at war for treason to have been committed.  The last time someone got caught committing treason was in the fall of 1968, weeks before the '68 election, when Nixon sabotaged the Paris peace talks by promising Nguyen Van Thieu that if he walked away from the table that Nixon would be much harder on the North Vietnamese in future negotiations than Hubert Humphrey.  It was a clear act of treason during wartime and some historians believe that if Ford had not pardoned Nixon he would have ended up executed for treason.

Of course, the country is at war with itself...so maybe those DC rioters did commit treason, eh?
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 23 Jun 2022, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:51 am

Absolutely!  And they all know that if Trump runs again he'll beat them easily after the mess Biden has made of this country, and they'll be prosecuted for their many crimes!
Being exposed as the criminals they are is their biggest fear, and they're certain that a second Trump term will do that!

What else could have possibly evoke this kind of fear in liberals like Crooked Hillary?:

Yep...all the crooks have so much dirt on each other they have to ban together to save themselves.


 

IkeBana » 23 Jun 2022, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:53 am

Sorry wanker...but you obviously don't even know what treason is.  It's a very specific charge in a very specific situation.  Under US law treason is the act of providing aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war.   Under US law, the country has to be at war for treason to have been committed.  The last time someone got caught committing treason was in the fall of 1968, weeks before the '68 election, when Nixon sabotaged the Paris peace talks by promising Nguyen Van Thieu that if he walked away from the table that Nixon would be much harder on the North Vietnamese than Hubert Humphrey.  It was a clear act of treason during wartime and some historians believe that if Ford had not pardoned Nixon he would have ended up executed for treason.

Of course, the country is at war with itself...so maybe those DC rioters did commit treason, eh?

Your mindless prattle notwithstanding, it remains a fact that libs like you wanted those demonstrators charged with treason, for which the penalty is death.
Isn't that what your fellow dumb liberal said?
Do you agree with it?
 

roadkill » 23 Jun 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:52 am

Liberal law professor Jonathan Turley explains that the J6 hearing is biased.

So **** what?  Opinions are like assholes.  Everybody's got one.  Is Jonathan Turley's opinion...if this really is his opinion...any better than anybody else's opinion.  No...it's a **** opinion.  Was Ginsburg's opinion any better than her pal Scalia's opinion, or vice versa?  No...opinions are opinions.  Opinions are not truths, opinions are not facts.
 
 

IkeBana » 23 Jun 2022, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 8:01 am

So **** what?  Opinions are like assholes.  Everybody's got one.  Is Jonathan Turley's opinion...if this really is his opinion...any better than anybody else's opinion.  No...it's a **** opinion.  Was Ginsburg's opinion any better than her pal Scalia's opinion, or vice versa?  No...opinions are opinions.  Opinions are not truths, opinions are not facts.

Is your opinion any better than anyone else's?

Maybe you should calm down Ike.  Your hatred of Trump has consumed you.

roadkill » 23 Jun 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:55 am

Yep...all the crooks have so much dirt on each other they have to ban together to save themselves.

It also explains why they're SO eager to take our guns away.  

Obviously, they know what they've been doing will infuriate the country enough to be willing to shoot them!

And Democrats haven't been this angry about anything since the Republicans took away their slaves!!!
 

Zeets2 » 23 Jun 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 8:05 am

It also explains why they're SO eager to take our guns away.  

Obviously, they know what they've been doing will infuriate the country enough to be willing to shoot them!

And Democrats haven't been this angry about anything since the Republicans took away their slaves!!!

Those kind of people want power, control, and wealth so badly they will destroy anything to get it.



 

Zeets2 » 23 Jun 2022, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2022, 7:51 am

Absolutely!  And they all know that if Trump runs again he'll beat them easily after the mess Biden has made of this country, and they'll be prosecuted for their many crimes!

You're absolutely nuts zits.  More Americans have voted for the Democratic candidate for president than the Republican candidate in seven of the last eight presidential elections.   You **** were saying the same **** about Biden for a year before the 2020 election that you're saying now and Biden still got seven million more votes. The two times Trump was the Republican candidate for president, the Democratic candidate got more votes.  It doesn't matter who the **** candidates are in 2024.  The Democratic candidate will get more votes.