well it must be true then Mr ike
but i'm being polite to you... bottom line. i paid for my own.. I never got pregnant... because i'm NOT stoopid... so who ARE you defending? just asking?
Now I don't even know what the **** it might be that you are talking about. Didn't get what for free?sootedupCyndi » 03 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ well it must be true then Mr ike: why do you defend it? i take back what i said..
the dummies from the bottom feeder left,, really do need help!
if they didnt get it for free.. they would do nothing at all..
You're never "just asking."sootedupCyndi » 03 Jul 2022, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ but i'm being polite to you... bottom line. i paid for my own.. I never got pregnant... because i'm NOT stoopid... so who ARE you defending? just asking?
IkeBana » 03 Jul 2022, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You're never "just asking."
I'm not defending anybody. I just dont like the way women are being treated in this country. This is obviously not a problem for you, clearly you think the SCOTUS is treating American women just fine.
their rights to believe nobody knows now is actually a kinetic eternity in plain sight as each lifetime is limited to only mutually evolving here now since conceived into an ever changing population total sum numbers changing forward now.Ike Bana » 03 Jul 2022, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Now I don't even know what the **** it might be that you are talking about. Didn't get what for free?
Not completely, no.Xavier_Onassis » 03 Jul 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ So you actually believe that if they remove nicotine from cigarettes, people will stop dumping their ashtrays "on the road down your driveway"?
There sure is . . . bad luck it's a blind alley !
JinnMartini » 04 Jul 2022, 4:36 am » wrote: ↑ Not completely, no.
But definitely a lot less . . . and, eventually, yes, it may stop altogether !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But . . . maybe increasing nicotine content in cigarettes by, say, 250 % may be a faster way to have them stop abruptly!
Maybe 500% ?
Wait . . . why the hell be so stingy? Make it a 1,000% increase !
That ought to make nicotine addicts very happy ?
Luxury 21st century Sub-Saharan dwelling :GHETTOBLASTER » 03 Jul 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ IKE IS CORRECT.
We shouldn't expect the ****** to be capable of providing for their own needs or to to take ownership of their own responsibities towards our common good.
SUB SAHARAN ****** HAVE NEVER CREATED A FUNCTIONAL MODERN DAY SOCIETY....EVER.
LET THAT SINK IN.
Other than rioting and looting, that is !sootedupCyndi » 03 Jul 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ if they didnt get it for free.. they would do nothing at all..
sootedupCyndi » 03 Jul 2022, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ . . . I never got pregnant... because i'm NOT stoopid...
probably a good thing i never made a little me.
JinnMartini » 04 Jul 2022, 5:17 am » wrote: ↑ Other than rioting and looting, that is !
Which means they'd get stuff for free anyway !
How did this fake news go over. Three years later and it never happened.sootedupCyndi » 22 Jun 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ The Biden administration is moving forward on a plan to mandate the elimination of nearly all nicotine in cigarettes, a policy that would upend the $95 billion U.S. cigarette industry and, health officials say, prompt millions of people to quit smoking.13 hours agoBiden Administration Targets Removal of Most Nicotine From ...https://www.wsj.com › articles › biden-administration-targ...