Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"Supreme Court Overrules Roe v. Wade in Dobbs Decision – Returns Abortion to State Lawmakers"
"Supreme Court Overrules Roe v. Wade in Dobbs Decision – Returns Abortion to State Lawmakers"
By roadkill
24 Jun 2022 9:39 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
27 Jun 2022 10:12 am
...wwwhhaaaaJantje_Smit » 27 Jun 2022, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Speaking of not stable... from 0:30...
https://youtu.be/FEQVqs8zWeA
28 Jun 2022 12:39 am
The baby killers have no one to blame but themselves...Jantje_Smit » 27 Jun 2022, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Speaking of not stable... from 0:30...
https://youtu.be/FEQVqs8zWeA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2S4wrx2LT0
28 Jun 2022 1:08 am
28 Jun 2022 11:08 am
28 Jun 2022 1:39 pm
If we really want to end abortion, we should mandate men get vasectomies at puberty and have them reversed when they can show they are emotionally, and financially capable of caring for a child.
Men can make literally thousands of children in a lifetime, and women can only make a couple dozen.
If women's bodies are going to be regulated, then men's bodies should be as well.
I do think this should be in the hands of individual states, however.
I am pro choice across the board. Vaccines and abortions. Helmets and seatbelts.
A woman is already a fully living human being. Most likely contributing to society.
This law only harms the poor. They will keep having babies that will continue to be a drain on the system.
Careful what you wish for.
Men can make literally thousands of children in a lifetime, and women can only make a couple dozen.
If women's bodies are going to be regulated, then men's bodies should be as well.
I do think this should be in the hands of individual states, however.
I am pro choice across the board. Vaccines and abortions. Helmets and seatbelts.
A woman is already a fully living human being. Most likely contributing to society.
This law only harms the poor. They will keep having babies that will continue to be a drain on the system.
Careful what you wish for.
28 Jun 2022 1:54 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ If we really want to end abortion, we should mandate men get vasectomies at puberty and have them reversed when they can show they are emotionally, and financially capable of caring for a child.
Men can make literally thousands of children in a lifetime, and women can only make a couple dozen.
If women's bodies are going to be regulated, then men's bodies should be as well.
I do think this should be in the hands of individual states, however.
I am pro choice across the board. Vaccines and abortions. Helmets and seatbelts.
A woman is already a fully living human being. Most likely contributing to society.
This law only harms the poor. They will keep having babies that will continue to be a drain on the system.
Careful what you wish for.
"If we really want to end abortion, we should mandate men get vasectomies at puberty and have them reversed when they can show they are emotionally, and financially capable of caring for a child."
What happened to women's rights? Should they be emotionally and financial capable of paying the way? Too often that never happens.
Why can't men "land a good financially capable women who pays all the bills"? Then nag the women when their day doesn't go right!
Traditionally when relationships go bad it's the man that pays AND loses fair custody. It's rarely a fair fight!
28 Jun 2022 1:58 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ If we really want to end abortion, we should mandate men get vasectomies at puberty and have them reversed when they can show they are emotionally, and financially capable of caring for a child.
Men can make literally thousands of children in a lifetime, and women can only make a couple dozen.
If women's bodies are going to be regulated, then men's bodies should be as well.
I do think this should be in the hands of individual states, however.
I am pro choice across the board. Vaccines and abortions. Helmets and seatbelts.
A woman is already a fully living human being. Most likely contributing to society.
This law only harms the poor. They will keep having babies that will continue to be a drain on the system.
Careful what you wish for.
Maybe women should tie their tubes until they grow up?
28 Jun 2022 2:11 pm
It's easier to reverse a vasectomy.
What's the big deal?
A little snip snap and no worries.
We have to deal with periods, cramps, bloating, birth control side effects, extra expense for tampons, pads, contraception.
Not to mention all the cost for period panties, and regular panties.
28 Jun 2022 2:13 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ It's easier to reverse a vasectomy.
What's the big deal?
A little snip snap and no worries.
We have to deal with periods, cramps, bloating, birth control side effects, extra expense for tampons, pads, contraception.
Not to mention all the cost for period panties, and regular panties.
Were you ever a man? Both parties have to consider their roll and act accordingly.
28 Jun 2022 2:14 pm
Both parties should be responsible equally.roadkill » 28 Jun 2022, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ "If we really want to end abortion, we should mandate men get vasectomies at puberty and have them reversed when they can show they are emotionally, and financially capable of caring for a child."
What happened to women's rights? Should they be emotionally and financial capable of paying the way? Too often that never happens.
Why can't men "land a good financially capable women who pays all the bills"? Then nag the women when their day doesn't go right!
Traditionally when relationships go bad it's the man that pays AND loses fair custody. It's rarely a fair fight!
If an unplanned pregnancy doesn't happen, then that alleviates SO much stress on a relationship.
Marriages would probably last longer and children would be coming up in happy homes.
Plus, the people that are poor and worthless won't be able to afford the vasectomy reversal surgery, and therefore not have children.
Welfare solved.
28 Jun 2022 2:15 pm
No, I have always been a woman.roadkill » 28 Jun 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Were you ever a man? Both parties have to consider their roll and act accordingly.
Ina perfect world, that's how it would work.
But, we are both grown ups, and we know that's not how life works.
28 Jun 2022 2:15 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Both parties should be responsible equally.
If an unplanned pregnancy doesn't happen, then that alleviates SO much stress on a relationship.
Marriages would probably last longer and children would be coming up in happy homes.
Plus, the people that are poor and worthless won't be able to afford the vasectomy reversal surgery, and therefore not have children.
Welfare solved.
Welfare will likely never be solved. It means votes.
28 Jun 2022 2:17 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I have always been a woman.
Ina perfect world, that's how it would work.
But, we are both grown ups, and we know that's not how life works.
I never had an unwanted child...most of the women I know have. But not by me.
28 Jun 2022 2:26 pm
Go to jail...do not pass Go.Neo » 27 Jun 2022, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ We have laws and penalties outlined for homicide. No need to reinvent the wheel.
"LAPD said 30-year-old Michael Ortiz sent the officer to the hospital with burns suffered in the assault. He is charged with attempted murder and is being held on bail set at $1 million."
https://redstateofminddaily.com/abortio ... methrower/
28 Jun 2022 2:27 pm
With people acting responsibly for the most part, the votes will be a non issue.
28 Jun 2022 2:27 pm
That you know of...roadkill » 28 Jun 2022, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I never had an unwanted child...most of the women I know have. But not by me.
I never had one either.
28 Jun 2022 2:29 pm
...'welfare' is measured, conducted, etc., in 'money'... furthermore, you should stfu as you are a miserable, unconscious, monetary ignoramus...your 'ideas'
in this realm are $hit...your opinion 
means nothing.... word... 
28 Jun 2022 2:34 pm
well pee pee? what was wrong with askin a guy who ***knocked ***a girl up... pay for the ride? drive her to she needed to go? why do we need to pay for this sheet now?peepee » 28 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ ...'welfare' is measured, conducted, etc., in 'money'... furthermore, you should stfu as you are a miserable, unconscious, monetary ignoramus...your 'ideas'
: WHY does the gubmint need to pay? why do they need rides...oh I know.. less darkies.. come on?
28 Jun 2022 2:38 pm
As far as we know you didn't. Let's stop with the cheap shots...this is not a B.See sanctioned thread.
28 Jun 2022 2:39 pm
AnnoyedLiberall » 28 Jun 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑ With people acting responsibly for the most part, the votes will be a non issue.
Agreed...but it's not likely to happen in our lifetime.
Who is online
In total there are 4073 users online :: 15 registered, 17 bots, and 4041 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Mrkelly, Buck Naked, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, *Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, 31st Arrival, *Huey, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Yahoo! Slurp, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, proximic, Not, Applebot, app.hypefactors.com, CriteoBot, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, LCC, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, YandexBot, curl/7