Liberal Forum

There are a lot of lefty tears, fits, and temper tantrums among the left because they can no longer butcher babies in the womb.  America wins. The left loses. 


 

I miss the old days when if a woman said No you could just beat her and go for it anyway, threatening her with exposing her for the witch she is if she says anything.

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm

There are a lot of lefty tears, fits, and temper tantrums among the left because they can no longer butcher babies in the womb.  America wins. The left loses. 


 

You forget the whole enslavement of women for 9 months.  You also overlooked the fact that Roe Vs Wade ended dangerous abortions.

ScottMon » 24 Jun 2022, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:09 pm

You forget the whole enslavement of women for 9 months.  You also overlooked the fact that Roe Vs Wade ended dangerous abortions.

They had sex. They take responsibility for their actions. Period. 

 

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:13 pm

They had sex. They take responsibility for their actions. Period.

What about rape?  What about sex assault?  What about women having dangerous pregnancies?  
 

ScottMon » 24 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm

What about rape?  What about sex assault?  What about women having dangerous pregnancies?

No answers for this?  not surprising. 

ScottMon » 24 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm

What about rape?  What about sex assault?  What about women having dangerous pregnancies?

I knew that you were going to go directly to the extremes. These account for literally .004% of pregnancies. 

My answer is always the same: Two wrongs don't make a right. 

As far as dangerous pregnancies are concerned, the mother would take precedent. 

Also, retreating behind the extremes is a form of hiding. I will only discuss this issue if you wish stand center ring with me, which is to talk about the majority of how pregnancies come about. 

Xavier_Onassis » 24 Jun 2022, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 5:57 pm

Leave it to a SERIAL LIAR LIKE YOU to hit send on another lie.
The Supreme Court decision forces no woman to carry.

 

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm

There are a lot of lefty tears, fits, and temper tantrums among the left because they can no longer butcher babies in the womb.  America wins. The left loses. 

Abortions will still happen plenty.  The only difference now is, it’s up to the states.

Vegas » 24 Jun 2022, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:37 pm

I knew that you were going to go directly to the extremes. These account for literally .004% of pregnancies. 

My answer is always the same: Two wrongs don't make a right. 

As far as dangerous pregnancies are concerned, the mother would take precedent. 

Also, retreating behind the extremes is a form of hiding. I will only discuss this issue if you wish stand center ring with me, which is to talk about the majority of how pregnancies come about.

Your stats are wrong.  And you are presuming to decide whether or not a women gets to live or die.  
 

ScottMon » 24 Jun 2022, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2022, 6:09 pm

You forget the whole enslavement of women for 9 months.  You also overlooked the fact that Roe Vs Wade ended dangerous abortions.

You left out the part that never gets reported in the MSM...Those women who deeply regretted their abortion...and the women that consider their children a Blessing.

I have 2 questions for you Scott...

#1  Can you define what a woman is.

#2  Do you support men competing in women's sports?

roadkill » 25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am

You left out the part that never gets reported in the MSM...Those women who deeply regretted their abortion...and the women that consider their children a Blessing.

I have 2 questions for you Scott...

#1  Can you define what a woman is.

#2  Do you support men competing in women's sports?

You can't defend your position so you try to change the subject.  Classy.  There are women who regretted their abortion and there are women who don't.  Both groups at least had the choice.
 

ScottMon » 25 Jun 2022, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:03 am

You can't defend your position so you try to change the subject.  Classy.  There are women who regretted their abortion and there are women who don't.  Both groups at least had the choice.

So you can't answer my 2 questions.  Do you and Bv share an apt?

roadkill » 25 Jun 2022, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:07 am

So you can't answer my 2 questions.  Do you and Bv share an apt?

I can answer them but they have nothing to do with abortion.  Its a pathetic attempt at whataboutism.
 

ScottMon » 25 Jun 2022, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:09 am

I can answer them but they have nothing to do with abortion.  Its a pathetic attempt at whataboutism.

Yer the one talking about women's rights...so I thought men competing in women's sports would violate women's rights.


I guess you see it differently.

roadkill » 25 Jun 2022, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:11 am

Yer the one talking about women's rights...so I thought men competing in women's sports would violate women's rights.

I guess you see it differently.

I am talking about a woman's right to a safe abortion.  I don't give a **** about transgenders in sports. 

ScottMon » 25 Jun 2022, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:22 am

I am talking about a woman's right to a safe abortion.  I don't give a **** about transgenders in sports.

So women can't compete with only women but must also compete against men.   Got it.

roadkill » 25 Jun 2022, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2022, 6:26 am

So women can't compete with only women but must also compete against men.   Got it.

What part of "I don't give a ****" did you have trouble understanding?