Liberal Forum

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?  

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

it's a secret club.  
 called The Good Ol Boys club.  

sootedupCyndi » 28 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm

it's a secret club.  
 called The Good Ol Boys club.

GOT IT....THANKS  

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

I'm not a lefty but I'll answer anyway. Companies don't hire women for less money, to do the same job, unless they are less qualified. In fact a woman will be more likely to be given the job before a man because of hiring preferences. Which of course is exactly backwards, unless one is willing to suggest that on average, men are as capable of rearing and nurturing kids as women. So the traditional bread winner gets knocked a rung lower in the workforce and as a result has reduced opportunity to provide for his family.

Women on average earn less then men over the course of their careers, because women are generally in the workforce for a shorter amount of time and also have more interrupted schedules because of pregnancy and child rearing. So on average women would obviously earn less over the course of their entire employment than men do even at the same position.

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm

GOT IT....THANKS

Yup.. and the gays have one too. Good ol gay club. They go from company to company destroying them.. get a severance. Move on to the next company. and destroy that one next... it's musical chairs at the top you know.  
 

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

What the left never talks about is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 already ensures equal pay for equal jobs.  

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a U.S. law that prohibits employers from paying different wages to men and women who work under similar conditions and whose jobs require the same level of skill, effort, and responsibility. It is part of the amended Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.1The act was an important milestone in gender equality, though of course wage gaps by gender persist.
https://www.investopedia.com/equal-pay- ... 0of%201938.

Women working similar jobs, with similar experience, with similar duties and time on the job are by law supposed to be the same.

What the left does is they throw all occupations in one pot and say women are paid less.  Women traditionally (although this changing) went into lower paying occupations like secretaries, receptionists, etc  while men went into higher paying fields with some more dangerous.  

 
 

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

Hillary's campaign paid women less than men.

Huey » 28 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm

What the left never talks about is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 already ensures equal pay for equal jobs.  

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a U.S. law that prohibits employers from paying different wages to men and women who work under similar conditions and whose jobs require the same level of skill, effort, and responsibility. It is part of the amended Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.1The act was an important milestone in gender equality, though of course wage gaps by gender persist.
https://www.investopedia.com/equal-pay- ... 0of%201938.

Women working similar jobs, with similar experience, with similar duties and time on the job are by law supposed to be the same.

What the left does is they throw all occupations in one pot and say women are paid less.  Women traditionally (although this changing) went into lower paying occupations like secretaries, receptionists, etc  while men went into higher paying fields with some more dangerous.

I KNEW I COULD COUNT ON YOU TO SEE MY KNOCK AGAINST THE LEFT
   

roadkill » 28 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:05 pm

Hillary's campaign paid women less than men.

SHE SURE DID 

• Hillary Clinton Paid Female Employees Less Than Males …
  https://www.inquisitr.com › 1869244 › hillary-clinton...Feb 23, 2015 · Assuming the accuracy of the calculations, it turns out that Hillary Clinton apparently paid women 72 cents for every dollar earned by men under her employ from 2002 to 2008, the Washington Free Beacon reported . "During those years, the median annual salary for a woman working in Clinton's office was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for ...
  • Author: Robert Jonathan
•  

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

The fact is that businesses pay employees more for those with more experience and a stronger resume that makes it worthwhile for them to pay more.  As a business owner, I'm also willing to pay more for a man whose physical strength makes it easier and quicker for him to do a job than for a woman.  But I would also pay more for a woman whose secretarial or computer skills happened to be better than a man's.  And if I'm looking for a new receptionist, I would certainly rank a woman based on appearance and having a more friendly attitude than a man might for someone who would be the first face a new customer might encounter.
 

Zeets2 » 28 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm

The fact is that businesses pay employees more for those with more experience and a stronger resume that makes it worthwhile for them to pay more.  As a business owner, I'm also willing to pay more for a man whose physical strength makes it easier and quicker for him to do a job than for a woman.  But I would also pay more for a woman whose secretarial or computer skills happened to be better than a man's.  And if I'm looking for a new receptionist, I would certainly rank a woman based on appearance and having a more friendly attitude than a man might for someone who would be the first face a new customer might encounter.

MAYBE SHE CAN DO BOTH...BE PHYSICALLY STRONG, AND UH....NEVER MIND  

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm

Zeets2 » 28 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm

The fact is that businesses pay employees more for those with more experience and a stronger resume that makes it worthwhile for them to pay more.  As a business owner, I'm also willing to pay more for a man whose physical strength makes it easier and quicker for him to do a job than for a woman.  But I would also pay more for a woman whose secretarial or computer skills happened to be better than a man's.  And if I'm looking for a new receptionist, I would certainly rank a woman based on appearance and having a more friendly attitude than a man might for someone who would be the first face a new customer might encounter.

MAYBE SHE CAN DO BOTH...BE PHYSICALLY STRONG, AND UH....NEVER MIND  

That always reminds me of him:



 
 

Huey » 28 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm

That always reminds me of him:

Yeah, as if THAT'S the face anyone would want representing their company! 

And I'm sure as **** not happy about a creature like that representing my country's administration either! 
 

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm

MAYBE SHE CAN DO BOTH...BE PHYSICALLY STRONG, AND UH....NEVER MIND  

The only benefit I could see is that a blowjob from that thing would probably count as anal!  Even beer goggles would be powerless.
Now, excuse me while I go wash my eyes out with soap!  
 

Work in the public sector but this scenario can't happen in my office. Why? The salaries are non-negotiable. If you are hired as a statistician.. you are paid x dollars no matter the gender, amount of education, experience with some very rare exceptions. As time goes on.. you get raises but those are based on time only. Now in other departments do men get an unfair advantage. IMO, yes. They get those coveted top admin jobs when it is clear that it is not based on skill but rather politics/optics.

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

Why do men over 6 foot get paid on average $1,000 more for every inch they are over 6 foot?

Holdor » 28 Jun 2022, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 2:55 pm

Why do men over 6 foot get paid on average $1,000 more for every inch they are over 6 foot?

IF YOU ARE NOT GONNA ANSWER MY QUESTION, IS THERE AN EXPECTATION ON YOUR BEHALF THAT I WOULD ANSWER YOURS

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 3:48 pm

IF YOU ARE NOT GONNA ANSWER MY QUESTION, IS THERE AN EXPECTATION ON YOUR BEHALF THAT I WOULD ANSWER YOURS

Well you took the time to type the above, My question was Rhetorical, I know that is big word.

TB7 » 28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm

ANSWER THIS

 If women do the same job for less money, why do companies, hire men, to do the same job for more money?

Cause the CEO is homosexual

impartialobserver » 28 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm

Work in the public sector but this scenario can't happen in my office. Why? The salaries are non-negotiable. If you are hired as a statistician.. you are paid x dollars no matter the gender, amount of education, experience with some very rare exceptions. As time goes on.. you get raises but those are based on time only. Now in other departments do men get an unfair advantage. IMO, yes. They get those coveted top admin jobs when it is clear that it is not based on skill but rather politics/optics.

Um...Kamala Harris was selected because she is a black woman and it clearly had nothing to do with skill. 

What you are saying is the total opposite of the truth. Politics favors women over men. If men are selected then it is because they have skill.

Women are selected for politics.