Liberal Forum

roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 8:36 am

What's the real reason yer upset? Even outside of politics I'll bet yer pissing and moaning about something.

Nobody pisses and moans like you roadrash.  And nobody but nobody posts continuous flaccid non-topical **** like you, roadrash.
 

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:14 am

So?  Who said they were?  nice reframe.

Then that means they were not deposed, or a piss poor job was done, or worse it was known but the show committee kept it quiet.  You make the call.

IDIOT.

Define "reappear"



 

IkeBana » 30 Jun 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:14 am

Nobody pisses and moans like you roadrash.  And nobody but nobody posts continuous flaccid non-topical **** like you, roadrash.

False

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:15 am

IDIOT.

Define "reappear"

Explain why it is relevant.  They are willing to testify that your star witness is a liar.  

roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 9:17 am

And the voters don't care about J6.

Fascist republican voters don't care about 1/6/21.

We shall see what comes of this House investigation.  But we all know what Trump is worried about.  He's worried about having to face a grand jury in Georgia.  And a grand jury in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and every other state where he threatened state officials if they refused to hand him the election.

IkeBana » 30 Jun 2022, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:21 am

Fascist republican voters don't care about 1/6/21.

We shall see what comes of this House investigation.  But we all know what Trump is worried about.  He's worried about having to face a grand jury in Georgia.  And a grand jury in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and every other state where he threatened state officials if they refused to hand him the election.

Nothing will come of J6...Most Americans don't care about that hoax circus.

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:17 am

Explain why it is relevant.  They are willing to testify that your star witness is a liar.

To whether or not they've appeared?

Really?

How **** stupid are you?
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:32 am

To whether or not they've appeared?

Really?

How **** stupid are you?

Are you playing dumb?  After she said they told this to her they said they would testify, under oath, that they did not tell her.  I have posted that numerous times.  They deny telling her that.  For two days you have been trying to reframe on the point she didn’t see it.  That was NEVER part of the story.

 

IkeBana » 30 Jun 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 8:34 am

Since you're quoting my post, shouldn't you make a comment that challenges something in my post...rather than another Tucker Carlson braindead tee vee talking point?

And listen Carnac, your brainfart prediction of what will come of these hearings is a **** pathetic joke.

NO, YOU and the clown committee are the pathetic jokes!!! You all should have red noses and wear size 25 shoes.

This illegal, unConstitutional clown court of an inquisition will not find out the truth of a rigged election, the truth is not the objective. Political payback and power is what the dim-0-craps are out for. They accuse Trump of wanting to be dictator for life when THAT is exactly their quest!!! The American voter sees this for what it is, pure partisan politics.  All polls are reflecting this and the dim-0-craps are going to get their asses handed to them in Nov and 2024!!!
 
 

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:38 am

Are you playing dumb?  After she said they told this to her they said they would testify, under oath, that they did not tell her.  I have posted that numerous times.  They deny telling her that.  For two days you have been trying to reframe on the point she didn’t see it.  That was NEVER part of the story.

THEY HAVE ALREADY APPEARED.


Nod.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:11 am

Anthony Guglielmi, the service’s chief of communications, told POLITICO that select committee investigators did not ask Secret Service personnel to reappear or answer questions in writing in the 10 days before asking Hutchinson about the matter at the hearing.

The truth is NOT what the clown committee seeks. They seek political revenge, even if they have to LIE and fabricate events.  So, what the **** did Trump being falsely accused of the **** Hutchinson LIED about have to do with the Jan 6 inquisition?
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

THEY HAVE ALREADY APPEARED.

Nod.

And others are disappearing...


https://flagandcross.com/voters-deliver ... ontent=CAN

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

THEY HAVE ALREADY APPEARED.

Nod.

Well, post the transcripts and show where this particular issue was discussed.  You claim you are watching it.  What were they asked about this?  Anything? 

And if they have already discussed it why would they offer to testify under oath and deny it?

You are not a smart “man”.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

THEY HAVE ALREADY APPEARED.

Nod.

What did they say?  Why hasn't this fact been divulged?  Could it be that they did not tell the inquisitors what they wanted to hear?
 

IkeBana » 30 Jun 2022, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 8:18 am

****, indeed.  Hutchinson did not report what happened in the vehicle.  She reported what she was told by those who were in the vehicle when it happened, what happened in the vehicle.  Her testimony was that she was in an office with Trump Deputy Chief of Staff (and former Secret Service Agent) Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel who was the Secret Service Team leader for Donald Trump. 

Her testimony was that Ornato said to her, "Did you hear what **** went down in The Beast?"  "No"

And then Hutchingson testified...

After this testimony, Cheney very specifically asked Hutchinson if Engle corrected or challenged anything that Ornato was reporting to her in that meeting, or if either had come to her later to correct or change anything that Ornato reported in that meeting.  Hutchinson said they had not. 

And note, that along with so much other **** that Trump pulled while his oozing rectal orifice was in the big chair behind the big desk in the Oval Office, that this ride he wanted to take, to join his mob over at the Capitol was an "OTR" movement.  An off-the record movement.  Nobody was supposed to know that.

This is not hearsay.  This is Hutchinson testifying as to a conversation she had with Ornato and Engle and what Ornato had reported in that conversation.  That is not hearsay.

You obviously have NO IDEA what hearsay evidence is, do you?  Were the secret service people she spoke with UNDER OATH when telling her that? NO?  THEN IT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE, AND INADMISSIBLE IN ANY REAL COURT OF LAW!

Read the definition and educate yourself!:

Definition of hearsay evidence: evidence based not on a witness's personal knowledge but on another's statement not made under oath

No one is saying that she perjured herself.  And if your precious kangaroo court gave a **** about the FACTS, then they would WANT those secret service agents TO APPEAR AND REVEAL THAT TESTIMONY UNDER OATH!
 

Buffalo » 30 Jun 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:03 am

What did they say?  Why hasn't this fact been divulged?  Could it be that they did not tell the inquisitors what they wanted to hear?

That is what we sill need to find out....

But it is a sideshow.

Grifty fomented an Insurrection and deliberately endangered the lives of Congresspeople, Capitol Security, innocent bystanders and his own VP.

He is so manifestly unfit, his own appointees were talking about invoking the 25th.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 10:58 am

THEY HAVE ALREADY APPEARED.

Nod.

Whether they appeared or not is not relevant.  Plus it was behind closed doors.  And they would not be offering to testify under oath concerning her testimony if they have done so already.  Instead they would be saying we already have testified under oath.

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:16 am

Whether they appeared or not is not relevant. Plus it was behind closed doors.  And they would not be offering to testify under oath concerning her testimony if they have done so already.  Instead they would be saying we already have testified under oath.
 

Stop.

Enough.

Was Levin vindicated?

Keep your **** musings to yourself.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:08 am

That is what we sill need to find out....

But it is a sideshow.

Grifty fomented an Insurrection and deliberately endangered the lives of Congresspeople, Capitol Security, innocent bystanders and his own VP.

He is so manifestly unfit, his own appointees were talking about invoking the 25th.

****!!!  The whole goddamn inquisition is a clown show not interested in the truth!!! 

Other than the heads of security for Congress and the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police resigning in shame, no one else in government has been held accountable.  Not one institution or agency has had to pay a price for failing to do its job that they had ample warning. In fact, the opposite is true: Congress has rushed to give the national and homeland security agencies more money and weaponize them to persecute their political opponents that speak against braindead and side with Trump SOVIET STYLE!!!

LOL!!! So much attention on Trump, the impact of 2 failed impeachment attempts, has merely enhanced his popularity and messianic standing.  There is NO SMOKING GUN with which to indict Trump!!!    And the act of not holding any federal or DC agencies accountable will be to affirm to so many that even partisan Washington—the lapdog media—cares only about preserving its own rule and power. 


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:18 am

Stop.

Enough.

Was Levin vindicated?

Keep your **** musings to yourself.

Stop.

Enough.


Whether they appeared or not is not relevant. Plus it was behind closed doors.  And they would not be offering to testify under oath concerning her testimony if they have done so already.  Instead they would be saying we already have testified under oath.