Liberal Forum

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:36 am

Stop.

Enough.

Whether they appeared or not is not relevant. Plus it was behind closed doors.  And they would not be offering to testify under oath concerning her testimony if they have done so already.  Instead they would be saying we already have testified under oath.
 

Buffalo » 30 Jun 2022, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:35 am

****!!!  The whole goddamn inquisition is a clown show not interested in the truth!!! 

Other than the heads of security for Congress and the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police resigning in shame, no one else in government has been held accountable.  Not one institution or agency has had to pay a price for failing to do its job that they had ample warning. In fact, the opposite is true: Congress has rushed to give the national and homeland security agencies more money and weaponize them to persecute their political opponents that speak against braindead and side with Trump SOVIET STYLE!!!

LOL!!! So much attention on Trump, the impact of 2 failed impeachment attempts, has merely enhanced his popularity and messianic standing.  There is NO SMOKING GUN with which to indict Trump!!!    And the act of not holding any federal or DC agencies accountable will be to affirm to so many that even partisan Washington—the lapdog media—cares only about preserving its own rule and power.

LOL!!! So much attention on Trump, the impact of 2 failed impeachment attempts, has merely enhanced his popularity and messianic standing. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:38 am

Tiny,

You don't have the essentials to figure out what is, and is not, relevant.

To remind yourself - Was Levin vindicated?

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:48 am

Ok, I’ll play your game.  It is only relevant if they discussed this particular topic of what happened in the car.  For two reasons.

1.  If they discussed it  with the agents behind closed doors and did not bring it up when Hutchinson said they told her then the committee members are either incompetent OR attempted to squash it so they can spin their narrative.

2.  If they discussed it and the agents said something different they are now lying.  And if they lied to the committee they jobs are in jeopardy.

But, you have already posted, finally, that they should go back and, go under oath, and discuss their claim.

Ps.  Yes, Levin was vindicated on the Trump Tower spying stuff.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:39 am

You're a **** idiot, Buffy.

Buffalo » 30 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm

And some believed the "Russia, Russia, Russia "collusion" lies, too. They are still lies, even if a few of you ****, liberal fools still believe them.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:35 pm

I believe the facts revealed in the course of the investigation.

You believe Grifty is competent.

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 11:48 am

Ok, I’ll play your game.  It is only relevant if they discussed this particular topic of what happened in the car.  For two reasons.

1.  If they discussed it  with the agents behind closed doors and did not bring it up when Hutchinson said they told her then the committee members are either incompetent OR attempted to squash it so they can spin their narrative.

2.  If they discussed it and the agents said something different they are now lying.  And if they lied to the committee they jobs are in jeopardy.

But, you have already posted, finally, that they should go back and, go under oath, and discuss their claim.

Ps.  Yes, Levin was vindicated on the Trump Tower spying stuff.

Buffalo » 30 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm

I don't believe you are competent enough to make that judgement, ***!!!  So, **** OFF!!!

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm

I made the call YEARS before the Washington Examiner told you.

Buffalo » 30 Jun 2022, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:44 pm

Tell someone that gives a ****, ***!!!  **** OFF!!!

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:45 pm

Where are you gonna run to now?

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm

I'm gonna pass on the idiocy in favor of addressing your complte lack of integrity

Levin wasn't vindicated in that respect either, but that wasn't the context of your bold claim, was it?

**** idiot.

roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm

You know all the hiding places.  

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm

I know you're running out of them..

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:45 pm

Where are you gonna run to now?

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm

ThaT has always been the context.  

Type “Mark Levin vindicated”  into Google and tell what the first four hits are talking about,

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:49 pm

I don't need to, Stupid ****.

You yapped it in the context of the DoJ's effort to be Sid Powell's bitch.

Huey » 30 Jun 2022, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 12:59 pm

No, you made it about that.  But Levin was correct in that area as well.

Acknowledge you have been answered.

But Levin was correct in that area as well.

Acknowledge you have been answered.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm

No, InstantRecall..

uhhhh, no.

Humiliatingly wrong.

A total tool.

Acknowledge that you've lied.