You are CLEARLY not much of a mathematorian.DeezerShoove » 30 Jun 2022, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ That you assume all the aborted babies are would-be criminals is the same as calling abortion "choice".
Seems like marketing for what is the 'baby killing'.
Reproductive rights, unviable tissue mass, etc are softening the event: disposing of the child within.
Now we get to predict that our babies are going to be thugs, too.
If that's the case then we should impose the scraping of all deformed, defective, imperfect fetuses.
Think of the improvements to the human race.![]()
ps
Everyone takes my position in the wrong way. I expect the same here as well.
And no shortage of ***. Take roe away, and there'll be an ABUNDANCE of unwanted, street-raised *** babies.roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ Most of the violence now is in blue cities. No shortage of abortions there.
Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2022, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ And no shortage of ***. Tke roe away, and there'll be an ABUNDANCE.
Just as there ws before Roe, when every movie was either the dirty harry franchise, the deathwish frnchise, the escape for new york frnchise america's biggest social concern was chimp-out street crime from unwanted *** babies in their wilding years.
roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ If so that's where the increase in violence will be not pro life states.
This is false.ConsRule » 30 Jun 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Every woman in America will be allowed to get an abortion if they want one. They just may need to travel a bit...liberal states can thank pro-life people later for the extra tourism dollars. I understand that doesn't fit your narrative, but it is, never the less, true.
ExactlyCannonpointer » 30 Jun 2022, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ The pro-life states are the only ones preventing ***. The blue states aren't going to outlaw abortion.
roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ I meant to post "I don't get the OP.
Anyway...where can I read Freakanomics?
Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ This is false.
Adding complexity decreases likelihood - it's statistically certain that adding expense and logistical complexity will decrease usage. And the most affected demographic will be the poorest, with the lowest level of social support systems: **** broke-*** welfare she-boons. That's where the street thugs come from. They **** 'em out and let the skreets raise 'em.
That is why the pro-life states will see the increase in skreet thug crime.
roadkill » 30 Jun 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ Inflation makes it even worse on the poor. They have no escape hatch.
I found something on Youtube...1.5 hours. I'll watch it later cause I'm going for a walk in 45 minutes.
His theory is that more *** = more crime.NEILCAR » 30 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ That is how it is in NY, Chicago, and LA today... I would suggest your theory is full of holes ...
Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2022, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ Inflation won't bother a *** that ain't born.
But a *** that IS born, and raised by the skreet, will bust yo haid.
Adding "complexity" and logistical issues does not remove the fact that abortions will be allowed. Just means that those that cum all over themselves at the thought of another baby being torn apart may need to pool their resources so they can help others overcome the obstacles and pay the expenses. It's a chance for them to get off their *** and do something.Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ This is false.
Adding complexity decreases likelihood - it's statistically certain that adding expense and logistical complexity will decrease usage. And the most affected demographic will be the poorest, with the lowest level of social support systems: **** broke-*** welfare she-boons. That's where the street thugs come from. They **** 'em out and let the skreets raise 'em.
NEILCAR » 30 Jun 2022, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ That is how it is in NY, Chicago, and LA today... I would suggest your theory is full of holes ...
Bad grammar leads to bad arguments. it SHOULD read, "If she wants to kill her baby, she MAY."ConsRule » 30 Jun 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Sorry, but it is NOT the reality that women will not be allowed to have abortions (the portion or your post to which I was commenting). Abortions are, and will be even after "trigger laws", legal in the US. Every woman is allowed to have an abortion if they are willing to travel. If she wants to kill her baby, she can.
ConsRule » 30 Jun 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Adding "complexity" and logistical issues does not remove the fact that abortions will be allowed. Just means that those that cum all over themselves at the thought of another baby being torn apart may need to pool their resources so they can help others overcome the obstacles and pay the expenses. It's a chance for them to get off their *** and do something.
Doesn't have too, but how governance works current, it is unpreventable making realities fruition forward.SJConspirator » 30 Jun 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ true. The difference is Atlanta, Mobile and Houston will become equally bad in 20 years.