I don't have any solutions. I just know that other countries don't have nearly as much of a problem with mass shootings as we do.Cannonpointer » 04 Jul 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ List them fruitcake. Tell us wha changes they made. And tell us how it worked out for them.
The last time you did that, you got your words shoved up your weak ***. Now you wanna spout NEW ****, as a way of out-dancing your OLD ****?![]()
![]()
![]()
most countries are not a hodge podge mongrelized mix of diverse ****ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have any solutions. I just know that other countries don't have nearly as much of a problem with mass shootings as we do.
You keep making grandiose claims about "other countries" having solutions - and when challenged to back your claims, retreating to vague general complaints.ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have any solutions. I just know that other countries don't have nearly as much of a problem with mass shootings as we do.
CANNONPOINTER INTRODUCED EVIDENCE THAT TOTALLY EXPOSES YOUR LIES.ScottMon » Today, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:12 pm
Australia. Denmark has its first mass shooting in years. Israel. Japan, China, Russia, etc...
Furthermore, a 2019 report by The Australia Institute stated the number of guns per gun owner in the country had increased from 2.1 guns per gun owner since 1997 to 3.9. Additionally, it found the number of firearms reported in Australia were higher than pre-Port Arthur levels.
Cannonpointer » 04 Jul 2022, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You keep making grandiose claims about "other countries" having solutions - and when challenged to back your claims, retreating to vague general complaints.
You just want to virtue signal.
You don't have the balls to propose solutions - or the brains to back the propositions you lack the balls to posit.
ever watch everything evolving at the same time and of that total sum nothing stays the same form or shape it originated from its point of arrival?
Actually...........he attended trump rallies.
So what, recon, setup a staged event so Trump people are the blame. Martyrs do anything to feel like heroes within their own one sided narrative groupthink.
**** !
and yet you refuse to accept now is kinetic eternity with your own body limited to only mutually evolving forward now as one of a kind. Why intellectual realities always fail and you won't change your mind.Jinn Martini » 05 Jul 2022, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑ **** !
EVERYTHING CHANGES . . . just not the way you leftist freaks would like it to go !
Nothing ever stay the same !
I wouldn't think, of all people, somebody like you, FUZ, would support the revocation of Bobby Crimo's Constitutional 2nd Amendment gun rights because of some disturbing **** he posted on social media.FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Your solution? Wait let me guess. Take guns away from sane people.
Same as your, don't **** with what never fails forward. But someone started removing reasonable doubt manifested in theories and theologies now wasn't eternity, as eternity is just perpetual balancing universe perpetually changing total sum life present per cycle added until extinction happens.Ike Bana » 05 Jul 2022, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't think, of all people, somebody like you, FUZ, would support the revocation of Bobby Crimo's 2nd Amendment gun rights because of some disturbing **** he posted on social media.
If you knew anything about mental health practice or mental health law you would know how complicated it would be to create legal guidelines for gun ownership based on an applicant's mental health history, that wouldn't end up in court every time.
For instance, most mental health professionals I know (we are the ones who would be used to write the language in any law) if asked "should anyone who has ever had a judge grant an order of protection against them, be able to get a gun license?" The answer from the mental health community would be a resounding "NO!"
Every **** mental health restriction would be challenged by somebody and dragged into court. Every one of them would end up appealed all the way to the SCOTUS. And this SCOTUS would say every time that you can't deny someone their Constitutional guarantees because of something somebody thinks they might do. And I think you would agree with this, wouldn't you FUZ.
So what's your **** plan for allowing only "sane people" to legally get their hands on a gun? There are places in this country where the court has decided that a citizen who is blind cannot be denied a gun permit.
What's your **** plan?
Except the gun laws which will never address these shootings.
Stop doing that, blaming government. People enabling doubt created the government they end up with ancestrally here. Karma.roadkill » 05 Jul 2022, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ Except the gun laws which will never address these shootings.
"Dem Rep. Jones: If Democrats Get Two More Senate Seats, We’re Ditching Filibuster to Pass Gun Control"
The government wants our guns for complete control.
Oh, we can all see that he's a right winger, fruity. Just like you're a real gun enthusiast.
Ike » wrote:I wouldn't think, of all people, somebody like you, FUZ, would support the revocation of Bobby Crimo's Constitutional 2nd Amendment gun rights because of some disturbing **** he posted on social media.FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Your solution? Wait let me guess. Take guns away from sane people.
If you knew anything about mental health practice or mental health law you would know how complicated it would be to create legal guidelines for gun ownership based on an applicant's mental health history, that wouldn't end up in court every time.
For instance, most mental health professionals I know (we are the ones who would be used to write the language in any law) if asked "should anyone who has ever had a judge grant an order of protection against them, be able to get a gun license?" The answer from the mental health community would be a resounding "NO!"
Every **** mental health restriction would be challenged by somebody and dragged into court. Every one of them would end up appealed all the way to the SCOTUS. And this SCOTUS would say every time that you can't deny someone their Constitutional guarantees because of something somebody thinks they might do. And I think you would agree with such a SCOTUS majority opinion, wouldn't you FUZ.
So what's your **** plan for allowing only "sane people" to legally get their hands on a gun? There are places in this country where the court has decided that a citizen who is blind cannot be denied a gun permit.
What's your **** plan? You don't even know what "sane" means legally.
Dressed as Waldo?!?!? What does that tell you?Squatchman » 05 Jul 2022, 4:42 am » wrote: ↑Actually...........he attended trump rallies.
That you scum have zero fashion sense.