Yes, that’s why they murder unarmed Palestinians at willIkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑The Israelis are mature enough to have something like a Second Amendment. But also smart enough to know they don't want anything like a Second Amendment. Israelis want their gun laws that treat firearms ownership laws and carry laws as a highly restricted privilege, not some **** up "right" for any **** asshole walking the streets. In Israel, if there is no legitimate reason to need a gun as part of one's employment, you can't get a permit.ScottMon » 04 Jul 2022, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't see it that way. Israel has no issues with school shootings.
But **** with the Israelis and you find out right away what kind of stupid mistake you are making. The Israelis use their firearms more effectively than anybody on this planet, including the US ProfessionalMilitary.
You have proven over and over to be a liar.ScottMon » 05 Jul 2022, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ you're wrong. Nothing changes. We still have school shootings.
You are a paranoid Q-Anon, **** slurping on Putin weenie.Cannonpointer » 05 Jul 2022, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ You are a dithering old woman with mouthal diarrhea.
look at the human rights activist denouncing "Muh freedom".ScottMon » 05 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ I have no doubt of that. But your suggestions will fall on deaf ears. Because even the smallest changes will be met with "Muh Freedom!" chants and "Shall Not Be Infringed."
You have proven over and over to be a liar.ScottMon » Today, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:35 am
you're wrong. Nothing changes. We still have school shootings.
Another limp-wristed gun grabber posing as Chuck Connors...IkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ You are a paranoid Q-Anon, **** slurping on Putin weenie.
However, if your pathtic existence ever gets to that point, and you asked me nicely, I could put a 7.62 nato round in your head from 500 yards with an M-14 with a **** little peep sight. Or with a Remington 700 SPS Tactical 308 if the military equipment is unavailable.
IkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ You are a paranoid Q-Anon, **** slurping on Putin weenie.
However, if your pathtic existence ever gets to that point, and you asked me nicely, I could put a 7.62 nato round in your head from 500 yards with an M-14 with a **** little peep sight. Or with a Remington 700 SPS Tactical 308 if the military equipment is unavailable.
In his mind, Gunny Highway. In reality he was more like Lt Ring.Cannonpointer » 05 Jul 2022, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑Another limp-wristed gun grabber posing as Chuck Connors...IkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ You are a paranoid Q-Anon, **** slurping on Putin weenie.
However, if your pathtic existence ever gets to that point, and you asked me nicely, I could put a 7.62 nato round in your head from 500 yards with an M-14 with a **** little peep sight. Or with a Remington 700 SPS Tactical 308 if the military equipment is unavailable.![]()
![]()
I just enjoy having had that part of my life, particularly when I can use it every time some conjob decides to call me a libtard who knows nothing about guns.ScottMon » 05 Jul 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ I have no doubt of that. But your suggestions will fall on deaf ears. Because even the smallest changes will be met with "Muh Freedom!" chants and "Shall Not Be Infringed."
You're a dumb **** heartless gunner cocksucker. You are the reason this country has become the **** it is.
So original. Did you formulate this comment all by yourself?Staplophobia » 05 Jul 2022, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑and you are dirty cocksucker
1) a person is not insane merely because they don't agree with your world view.IkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't think, of all people, somebody like you, FUZ, would support the revocation of Bobby Crimo's Constitutional 2nd Amendment gun rights because of some disturbing **** he posted on social media.
If you knew anything about mental health practice or mental health law you would know how complicated it would be to create legal guidelines for gun ownership based on an applicant's mental health history, that wouldn't end up in court every time.
For instance, most mental health professionals I know (we are the ones who would be used to write the language in any law) if asked "should anyone who has ever had a judge grant an order of protection against them, be able to get a gun license?" The answer from the mental health community would be a resounding "NO!"
Every **** mental health restriction would be challenged by somebody and dragged into court. Every one of them would end up appealed all the way to the SCOTUS. And this SCOTUS would say every time that you can't deny someone their Constitutional guarantees because of something somebody thinks they might do. And I think you would agree with such a SCOTUS majority opinion, wouldn't you FUZ.
So what's your **** plan for allowing only "sane people" to legally get their hands on a gun? There are places in this country where the court has decided that a citizen who is blind cannot be denied a gun permit.
What's your **** plan? You don't even know what "sane" means legally.
Just stay from YOUR Democrat Run URBAN CONGO OOGA BOOGA **** HOLES and my chances of getting shot in the USA drop by easily 50%...maybe more..!!!IkeBana » 05 Jul 2022, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I just enjoy having had that part of my life, particularly when I can use it every time some conjob decides to call me a libtard who knows nothing about guns.
I suspect my skill with the M-14 would make any of the con gunners in this joint look like the pathetic, rank amateurs they are.
More pathetic, surgeons at Highland Park Hospital reporting the "surreal" experience treating the injured. Except for the one guy who was a trauma surgeon in Afghanistan who was quoted as saying, "These are war wounds."
The dumb **** parents are Bobby Crimo's dumb **** parents.