He threw out 10.3 in a hypothetical statement. He was not referring to anything. The statement is what it is, stop trying to make something more of it where there simply isn't more to it. Your suppositions are pure speculation.Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ He said 10.3....an odd detail.
He may have referred to some census numbers rather than the actual score.
Why do you throw out "10.3" as a "hypothetical"?Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ He threw out 10.3 in a hypothetical statement. He was not referring to anything. The statement is what it is, stop trying to make something more of it where there simply isn't more to it.
Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ There is quite a bit of things about the holocaust that don't add up.
1. Where are the bodies? This is my main doubt. The pictures and video of all those bodies that we are shown from school, and wherever else, does not prove they were related to the holocaust narrative. It was a huge and gruesome war, so mass graves, along with piled up bodies, can be expected. In fact, how could it not? It would be virtually impossible to not have mass graves with piled up bodies. However, there is no physical evidence of any mass graves that were connected to the holocaust. You will find a lot of news articles online about mass graves and the holocaust. I have seen most of them. However, if you read past the headline and read the contents of those articles, you will see that they never proved it. they just assumed it.
2. Stuffing 500 - 1200 people in a room and gassing them with the crappy tech they had back then is not realistic. They claimed that it would take about 20 minutes to gas 800 people in the room. Our gas chambers, for death row inmates, take about 10-18 minutes...with tech and gas that is more effective than back then. And they are claiming they can kill 800 bodies in 20 minutes with their **** tech? It doesn't add up.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/fi ... ke-n329371
Now I can buy into a firing squad. That would make sense. However, I still need to see the physical evidence between the mass graves/piled bodies and the holocaust.
This is a lie.In fact, how could it not? It would be virtually impossible to not have mass graves with piled up bodies. However, there is no physical evidence of any mass graves that were connected to the holocaust. You will find a lot of news articles online about mass graves and the holocaust. I have seen most of them. However, if you read past the headline and read the contents of those articles, you will see that they never proved it. they just assumed it.
You've already been shown the evidence.Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Like I would expect you to come up with any substantial rebuttal.
Here comes the cop-out response. Watch: 'But it's a lie, there is nothing to rebut." Yet, you provide no evidence.
Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Most were incinerated. I'm sure many were buried. It's not like today's Germans are going around digging up their country looking for dead Jews. Do you really expect Germans to go on an all out hunt for dead bodies of Jews or human ash under buildings, roads, in forests, etc? Are you freaking serious?
They were incinerating bodies by the truck and train loads. It's not rocket science to incinerate bodies. But, even if it was "rocket science", Germany had the best rocket scientists in the world. And when you say "crappy technology", WTF??? Jet planes, rockets, pulsejets, rocket powered planes - all invented and built during the 1930's. Is this an example of the "crappy tech" they had back then....
I mean, come on, the US, Germany and Russia were all working on nuclear fission weapons, and you claim that their "crappy tech" couldn't handle burning a bunch of bodies at one time? I suppose you just have to have the freaking internet, virtual reality and GPS mapping - yeah, that's the kind of technology to burn bodies!!!
Gassing and shooting people are very efficient methods of execution, and were low-tech even for the 1940's.
No..Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ I have been shown the testimonies, not the physical evidence.
Here we go with the same conversation again. It's always redundant with you. You always want to repeat the same things.
First, I do not throw out 10.3 as "hypothetical". Eichmann did on the tape. He was speaking hypothetically. Did you even bother listening to what you posted?Blackvegetable » 07 Jul 2022, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you throw out "10.3" as a "hypothetical"?
Think he is so anal he has to go to one decimal point, even then?
My guess is that Eichmann gave the 10.3 million figure because that was the estimated number of all Jews in Europe.Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ He threw out 10.3 in a hypothetical statement. He was not referring to anything. The statement is what it is, stop trying to make something more of it where there simply isn't more to it. Your suppositions are pure speculation.
That is exactly the point I'm making, Brick.Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ First, I do not throw out 10.3 as "hypothetical". Eichmann did on the tape. He was speaking hypothetically. Did you even bother listening to what you posted?
Second, his statement, on its own, makes it a hypothetical number. There is nothing in anything he said that ties that number to any real number of Jews murdered.
Third, I don't know if Eichmann is anal or not. I do know that he was no genius, and probably not very good with numbers, so there's that.
In any event, I find it funny that Eichmann, who looks rather "Jewish" himself thought he had to kill all the Jews.
Because Woke Democrats want to make sure that prisoners who get gassed to death are killed "humanely"Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Incinerated? With their **** tech? Yes, I am saying their **** tech. They told us what they used and wouldn't have worked like they said. They are claiming they turned millions to ashes. Come on man. If they did have the tech, they didn't use it according to their own testimonies. It's not about rocket They even claimed that they used the fat of other bodies to burn for oil. LOL. They were emaciated. What fat?
How come it takes us 10-18 minutes to gas a death row prisoner, but somehow, they were able to gas 500-1200 bodies in 20 minutes? Please.
Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Because Woke Democrats want to make sure that prisoners who get gassed to death are killed "humanely"
The Nazis crammed as many Jews as they could into big warehouses and gassed them. They also executed them by shooting them, and likely crammed plenty of Jews in incinerators alive or half alive. As if they really cared.
I use burn barrels to incinerate garbage, boxes, tree limbs, leaves etc. When I get those babies fired up, good and hot, I can stuff wet wood and wet garbage or wet cardboard in there and about 3-5 minutes later, it's ash. City folks don't know stuff like that.
I told you already. They cram 1000 people into a warehouse and pump a Zyklon B into it and people die very quickly.Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll ask again. How were they able to gas to death 800-1200 people in 20 minutes, when it takes us 10-18 minutes to gas one person to death?
Skans » 07 Jul 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I told you already. They cram 1000 people into a warehouse and pump a Zyklon B into it and people die very quickly.
Now, ask yourself - does California use Zyklon B to execute its prisoners en masse?
Why do you insist on boring everyone with the ******* photo of Kim Jung Un week after week?roadkill » 07 Jul 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm watching a movie..."The Terminal" with Tom Hanks.
Just in case yer bored.