Was he too persecuted for doing naked jumping jacks in a public park?FOS » 07 Jul 2022, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ And you jews never got Leon degrelle did ya lol.
And he pointed out the **** of the holocaust to the bitter end.
He was sentenced to death by his fellow Belgians, imbecile.FOS » 07 Jul 2022, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ And you jews never got Leon degrelle did ya lol.
And he pointed out the **** of the holocaust to the bitter end.
Do you want to see evidence that you're a moron?Vegas » 07 Jul 2022, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑
And here is more evidence that Veghead is a moron. Intelligent people don't give a **** about IQ. Hawkings didn't. Einstein didn't. But those who are idiots obsess over it. Like Veghead. Dufus. Not to mention how redundant and repetitive stupid people are...like veghead. He is predictable, he says the same **** every day over and over and over.....
I have no issue with anyone questioning the engineering of Auschwitz gas chambers. Actually, as between two very knowledgeable people on the subject, it would be a rather interesting debate. I am admittedly not an expert on the engineering behind the murder of Jews. But, I do know enough to know that more gas in a confined area can kill more than one person in 20 minutes, like Vegas seems to suggest. Nor do I know for certain that the only compound used was Hydrogen cyanide. Both the US and Germany were experimenting with different highly toxic chemical compounds designed to kill people quickly.FOS » 07 Jul 2022, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ That would not work. The room would need to be airtight. Aushwitz 'gas chamber' is not.
There would need to be very complex venting systems to vent the gas out and dispose somewhere (at alcatraz when people were gassed there were often birds that died from the gas being vented...think about how difficult it would be to deal with venting enough gas to kill 1000 people a day for years...come on)
And it would take hours to hose doen all the bodies (with ammonia...something that was not transported en mass to the camps) before they were safe to be handled and transported to the ovens.
The narrative simply does not add up from an engineering perspective for anyone with knowledge of gas chambers.
But because it is basically illegal to question the narrative,, engineers keep quiet.
them pf course you have the issue that there simply weren't enough crematoria to dispose of that many bodies...and there is no Prussian blue chemical reactions in the chamber...and countess other things which simply cannot be explained. 5he story is actually rather absurd
Dems have been proving Trump innocent for over 6 years now ... and he calls us morons LOL
create a sealed room and vacuum out the air, only gas left is people exhaling and farting and their dead in less than 10 minutes. No baking ovens. Also the closer to vacuum the blood starts boiling since the human body is over 70% water.Skans » 08 Jul 2022, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ I have no issue with anyone questioning the engineering of Auschwitz gas chambers. Actually, as between two very knowledgeable people on the subject, it would be a rather interesting debate. I am admittedly not an expert on the engineering behind the murder of Jews. But, I do know enough to know that more gas in a confined area can kill more than one person in 20 minutes, like Vegas seems to suggest. Nor do I know for certain that the only compound used was Hydrogen cyanide. Both the US and Germany were experimenting with different highly toxic chemical compounds designed to kill people quickly.
Anyway, such a debate would be interesting, I should think.
Good point. But, did they do that?omh » 08 Jul 2022, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ create a sealed room and vacuum out the air, only gas left is people exhaling and farting and their dead in less than 10 minutes. No baking ovens. Also the closer to vacuum the blood starts boiling since the human body is over 70% water.
Really doesn't matter, those died are still dead. evolving doesn't have time to wait, it only happens now.
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron."
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
↓Here is evidence that you are a moron:
- You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
- You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one.
- Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
- You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism.
- You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others.
- You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.
Thank you for listing a handful of the exhibits.Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ LOL! Your dementia is in its last stage. Do you even remember me posting the below to you over and over after you say this same thing? Your memory is awful. Just awful.
↓
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron."
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
↓Here is evidence that you are a moron:
- You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
- You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one.
- Take a look at your quote from the top of all of this. LOL!
- You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism.
- You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others.
- You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.
You don't simply get to gainsay objective evidence....unless you are a willful narcissistic child.Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ The handful of exhibits that cancelled out every one of usual repetitive reposts. You are welcome.
↓
So, let's put things aside just for a moment. Forget the forum for a second. I'll lift the rule for a quick conversation.
Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ You don't simply get to gainsay objective evidence....unless you are a willful narcissistic child.
Oh...wait..you ARE....
This is awkward
No....all you've done is prattle in the face of it...Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ I don't expect you to remember the objective evidence that I had reposted 3000k times already.
Saying and doing are two polar areas of one axiom of power of suggestion getting others to make it happen. Why else have chain of command social order?Xavier_Onassis » 08 Jul 2022, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ It is always amazing how Nazis and neoNazis always claim that the Nazis were INNOCENT of killing six million Jews. But then on the other hand, they also say that Jews are soooo terribly awful that they all DESERVE extermination.
Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ No....all you've done is prattle in the face of it...
You don't have the peas for that.Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Go back to my other notification about having a serious conversation. I know you saw it. I am even going to lift the rule for it.