Liberal Forum

Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 10:43 am

I guess I am not surprised that you wouldn't want to talk about it. You are a coward, after all.

1. You will continue to evade it. It's just what you do.

Talk about something you vaguely describe?

Not really.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 10:44 am

Talk about something you vaguely describe?

Not really.

LOL! I gave three specific examples. It doesn't get any more unambiguous. Yeah, I didn't think that you read it. It was longer than 5 words. 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 10:46 am

LOL! I gave three specific examples. It doesn't get any more unambiguous. Yeah, I didn't think that you read it. It was longer than 5 words.

Where I provided evidence and you spat up prattle.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm

Where I provided evidence and you spat up prattle.

evidence is circumstantial since it is defined by relative time theory life is more than limited to evolving while perpetually balancing forward now as a species within a food chain of one atmosphere only.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm

Where I provided evidence and you spat up prattle.

Evidence of what? Your **** lies that you repeat over and over...

That's all you do here. Repost past crap over and over...crap that you can't even prove.

 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 1:46 pm

Evidence of what? Your **** lies that you repeat over and over...

That's all you do here. Repost past crap over and over...crap that you can't even prove.

Objective evidence is proof 

Gainsaying is prattle.

You are a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm

Objective evidence is proof 

Gainsaying is prattle.

You are a moron.

You have given ****. You can't refute the media comment, I beat the **** out of you with your lie about Potus 2008 crap, I always cancel out your damn pic, and everything else is just desperation on your part. Nothing more. 

Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 2:01 pm

You have given ****. You can't refute the media comment, I beat the **** out of you with your lie about Potus 2008 crap, I always cancel out your damn pic, and everything else is just desperation on your part. Nothing more.

So you assert.....against the overwhelming objective evidence that you are a moron.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 3:23 pm

So you assert.....against the overwhelming objective evidence that you are a moron.

You gave me assertions. Just because you say it was overwhelming objective evidence doesn't mean it was. It was overwhelming assertions. 

Here, look: 

For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron?" 

• Pic, which I easily cancel out. 
• Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response. 
• Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned. 
• Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one. 
• Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****. 
• Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat. 
• I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted. 

 

Skans » 08 Jul 2022, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 7:57 am

I have no issue with anyone questioning the engineering of Auschwitz gas chambers.  Actually, as between two very knowledgeable people on the subject, it would be a rather interesting debate.  I am admittedly not an expert on the engineering behind the murder of Jews.   But, I do know enough to know that more gas in a confined area can kill more than one person in 20 minutes, like Vegas seems to suggest.  Nor do I know for certain that the only compound used was Hydrogen cyanide.  Both the US and Germany were experimenting with different highly toxic chemical compounds designed to kill people quickly.

Anyway, such a debate would be interesting, I should think.

Well it would be very difficult to have such a debate because there is absolutely zero physical evidence of any gas chambers at all...so any speculation on it is speculation at best. 

There are no blueprints, there are no fan blades, there are no gas pellets, no bodies...nothing..

People would be forcbe to just imagine for themselves what might have been possible because the amount of actual data one can get happens to be identical to the amount one could get if the Germans never built any gas chambers.
 

FOS » 08 Jul 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:38 pm

Well it would be very difficult to have such a debate because there is absolutely zero physical evidence of any gas chambers at all...so any speculation on it is speculation at best. 

There are no blueprints, there are no fan blades, there are no gas pellets, no bodies...nothing..

People would be forcbe to just imagine for themselves what might have been possible because the amount of actual data one can get happens to be identical to the amount one could get if the Germans never built any gas chambers.

Deny, deny deny.  There are photos of gas chambers. There are photos of the death camps, you are a big fat LIAR!

Xavier_Onassis » 08 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm

Deny, deny deny.  There are photos of gas chambers. There are photos of the death camps, you are a big fat LIAR!

There are no such photos. Sorry, you are wrong

Vegas » 08 Jul 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 3:39 pm

You gave me assertions. Just because you say it was overwhelming objective evidence doesn't mean it was. It was overwhelming assertions. 

Here, look:

 

FOS » 08 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm

There are no such photos. Sorry, you are wrong

You're a **** idiot

FOS » 08 Jul 2022, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:38 pm

Well it would be very difficult to have such a debate because there is absolutely zero physical evidence of any gas chambers at all...so any speculation on it is speculation at best. 

There are no blueprints, there are no fan blades, there are no gas pellets, no bodies...nothing..

People would be forcbe to just imagine for themselves what might have been possible because the amount of actual data one can get happens to be identical to the amount one could get if the Germans never built any gas chambers.

This is utter garbage.

 

FOS » 08 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:47 pm

There are no such photos. Sorry, you are wrong

In fact, one of the most famous eyewitnesses to the gas chamber is Rudolf Vrba, who in 1985 was an assistant professor at the Canadian University of British Columbia. Vrba's testimony has formed the basis of most, if not all, descriptions of the gas chambers of Auschwitz, as he was interned at that camp during the war.

However, in 1985, during a trial of a holocaust revisionist in Toronto, Vrba testified that his book, "I Cannot Forgive", which contained all his eyewitness accounts was "an artistic picture" and that he himself had in fact never witnessed any gassings. ("Book 'An Artistic Picture' : Survivor never saw actual gassing deaths", Toronto Star, January 24, 1985)

Pushed to the point, Vrba admitted that he never witnessed anybody being gassed to death and his book about Auschwitz-Birkenau is only "an artistic picture...not a document for a court." Vrba told the trial that his written and pictorial descriptions of the Auschwitz crematoria and gas chambers are based on "what I heard it might look like." He said that his 1944 drawings of the "Auschwitz camp layout were inexact."

 

Bard » 08 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm

In fact, one of the most famous eyewitnesses to the gas chamber is Rudolf Vrba, who in 1985 was an assistant professor at the Canadian University of British Columbia. Vrba's testimony has formed the basis of most, if not all, descriptions of the gas chambers of Auschwitz, as he was interned at that camp during the war.

However, in 1985, during a trial of a holocaust revisionist in Toronto, Vrba testified that his book, "I Cannot Forgive", which contained all his eyewitness accounts was "an artistic picture" and that he himself had in fact never witnessed any gassings. ("Book 'An Artistic Picture' : Survivor never saw actual gassing deaths", Toronto Star, January 24, 1985)

Pushed to the point, Vrba admitted that he never witnessed anybody being gassed to death and his book about Auschwitz-Birkenau is only "an artistic picture...not a document for a court." Vrba told the trial that his written and pictorial descriptions of the Auschwitz crematoria and gas chambers are based on "what I heard it might look like." He said that his 1944 drawings of the "Auschwitz camp layout were inexact."

It is funny how often ignorant people tell me that there is physical.evidence...like photos or some orders from nazi high command etc. 

Cause you would assume that if such a massive project did in fact happen involving so many people, there would HAVE to be some physical.evidence. some photo. Something 

nope...there is nothing. 

And the cope for why this is of course is that nazis were just real good at destroying evidence.

But a cope is a just a cope. That is post hoc rationalization. The fact remains that there is no evidence other than inconsistent and sometimes fantastical testimonies and confessions. 
 
 

FOS » 08 Jul 2022, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 5:12 pm

It is funny how often ignorant people tell me that there is physical.evidence.

The story goes that they worked barehanded disentangling bodies, clipping hair, and pulling teeth.  I think there's a lot of people who do not understand the silliness of that claim.  And they're not about to change . . .
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm

Objective evidence is proof 

Gainsaying is prattle.

You are a moron.
 

Why do people have to justify the kinetic self evident way living happens in series parallel of occupying space now? They don't, but every social identity has to prove their loyalty 24/7 to the royal we in charge of their geographical area evolving in this atmosphere spontaneously alive as simultaneously here since conceived to replace the 4 previous generations combined 93.75% the DNA of their sole displacement in plain sight.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2022, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2022, 4:59 pm

And like clockwork. How do you not remember what my reply will be every time. Your memory is ****.