Liberal Forum

I do not actually care whether Musk owns Twitter or not.  But he WANTED to own it, and signed something that seems to have been a contract that would be quite difficult to weasel out of.
After studying Twitter's records, he has now decided that he wants out.
I think that anyway you look at it, Musk was not acting like a wise businessman when he signed the agreement to buy Twitter.
He looks quite foolish. 
Not nearly so foolish as Trump with his plans to dominate Atlantic City gambling, though.
Sucker lost a BILLION DOLLARS.
Let Musk try to back out of the deal.   May the man with the best lawyers win!

omh » 11 Jul 2022, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 5:29 pm

Relative time theory is fiction. Time travel is fiction theorists labeled scientists use to get government grants to pretend life exceeds mutually evolving now same as priests promise immortal intellectual life if one joins ideology cradle to grave.

Time travel is always fiction, because time flows only in one direction, which we call forward and into the future. The arrow of time flows only forward.
The government has not a thing to do with the nature of time. Ideology has nothing to do with this, either.

Huey » 04 Oct 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 11:53 am

Well, when you stop posting you won’t look like such an idiot.  You have ‘t even made a point, 5 Times.

Your opinions, but you should #readhissig.

I told you Musk wasn't getting out of the deal - without paying a hefty fee.
So weak were his legal arguments that he folded.

You swallowed them uncritically.

nod.

 

Isn't it illegal for a publicly traded socialist media company like jewbook and twatter to manipulate, lie and mislead the public on how popular their publication actually is and how many active registered users they have? Doesn't that affect the stock price?

Blackvegetable » 04 Oct 2022, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:21 pm

Your opinions, but you should #readhissig.

I told you Musk wasn't getting out of the deal - without paying a hefty fee.
So weak were his legal arguments that he folded.

You swallowed them uncritically.

nod.

My post from a few months ago was not opinion.  It stated the fact that twitter would not release the requested info.  That is a fact.  Whenever you go back to old posts you are getting face slammed on a current topic.  You lose.

As I said you are more than welcome to make your own case.  With this view I am not doing your research, Duplex.

After lunch view:


 

Huey » 04 Oct 2022, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:28 pm

My post from a few months ago was not opinion.  It stated the fact that twitter would not release the requested info.  That is a fact.  Whenever you go back to old posts you are getting face slammed on a current topic.  You lose.

As I said you are more than welcome to make your own case.  With this view I am not doing your research, Duplex.

After lunch view:

It was the allegation in his motion, you stupid ****.

How many times are you gonna make the same mistake?

Sure looks like your environment is strictly "controlled"....


 

Warcok » 04 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm

Isn't it illegal for a publicly traded socialist media company like jewbook and twatter to manipulate, lie and mislead the public on how popular their publication actually is and how many active registered users they have? Doesn't that affect the stock price?

There are NO "socialist" companies in the stock market. All companies that sell stock are by definition capitalist.
When you buy a stock, you should read the shareholders' report very critically. All companies claim that in some way they are better than their competition. Even Avis, who has always been second, claims that because they are in second place, that makes them "try harder". Hype is to be expected from anyone selling anything.

Did Twitter break any laws or regulations?  I don't know enough about either the regulations or Twitter to comment on this one way or another. I will leave this up to the experts.

It is entirely possible that some of the users that Twitter thinks are real people are bots or something other than real people.

Xavier_Onassis » 04 Oct 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:33 pm

There are NO "socialist" companies in the stock market. All companies that sell stock are by definition capitalist.
When you buy a stock, you should read the shareholders' report very critically. All companies claim that in some way they are better than their competition. Even Avis, who has always been second, claims that because they are in second place, that makes them "try harder". Hype is to be expected from anyone selling anything.

Did Twitter break any laws or regulations?  I don't know enough about either the regulations or Twitter to comment on this one way or another. I will leave this up to the experts.

It is entirely possible that some of the users that Twitter thinks are real people are bots or something other than real people.

As for Musk, he agreed to a deal and apparently read over the contract carefully before signing it. If he signed something that was not to his benefit, he has only himself to blame.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm

It was the allegation in his motion, you stupid ****.

How many times are you gonna make the same mistake?

Sure looks like your environment is strictly "controlled"....

Ah, now you are embellishing what my post is about.  You lose.

Xavier_Onassis » 04 Oct 2022, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:33 pm

There are NO "socialist" companies in the stock market. All companies that sell stock are by definition capitalist.

 

There are NO "socialists" who own stocks in a company. All socialists who buy stocks are by definition capitalist.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2022, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 1:32 pm

GeorgeWashington » 10 Jul 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 11:30 am

. Twitter has failed or refused to provide this information. Sometimes Twitter has ignored Mr. Musk’s requests, sometimes it has rejected them for reasons that appear to be unjustified, and sometimes it has claimed to comply while giving Mr. Musk incomplete or unusable information.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data ... ex99-p.htm

Blah, blah...

Elon ran his mouth, Twitter called his bluff, and now he's gonna have to cut them a large check.

 

Huey » 10 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm

You always leave out important details.

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm

So you insist.

But you always get it wrong, while I never cease to amaze.

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2022, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 2:48 pm

Huey » 10 Jul 2022, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 2:44 pm

​​​​@GeorgeWashington  got it right.  You didn’t.

According to whom?

 

Huey » 10 Jul 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 3:15 pm

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2022, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 2:48 pm

According to whom?

The truth,  unless you are saying Twitter did produce the info.

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 3:32 pm

Huey » 10 Jul 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 3:15 pm

The truth,  unless you are saying Twitter did produce the info.

It's a pretext.

He didn't want to buy it.

He'll be obliged to pay an "exit fee"..

Always the same lying ****.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Oct 2022, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:51 pm

Always the same lying ****.

Good for you.  My post from a July is still accurate.  You are reaching 5 Times Loser.

Huey » 10 Jul 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 3:45 pm

that’s opinion,

The facts is Twitter REFUSED to give the info.

Learn the difference between fact and opinion, loinfo.

im out.

that is fact.  

Huey » 04 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm

Good for you.  My post from a July is still accurate.  You are reaching 5 Times Loser.

No...it isn't. 

GW was citing from a respondent's motion.

That does NOT make them facts.

You're a **** idiot.


 

Time will tell whether Musk pays a penalty or not.
There could be a non disclosure  agreement concerning the amount.
I can't say that I care one way or another.
We are probably better off if Twitter is owned by many shareholders, rather than just one guy.
I do not post on Twitter, nor do I have any reason to buy stock in Twitter.

Here is a stock tip: APA was $34.12 on 9/28/22.  today it is $38.74.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 04 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm

Time will tell whether Musk pays a penalty or not.
There could be a non disclosure  agreement concerning the amount.
I can't say that I care one way or another.
We are probably better off if Twitter is owned by many shareholders, rather than just one guy.
I do not post on Twitter, nor do I have any reason to buy stock in Twitter.

There's a substantial breakup fee.

Musk and Twitter agreed to a so-called reverse termination fee of $1 billion when the two sides reached a deal last month. Still, the breakup fee isn't an option payment that allows Musk to bail without consequence.


https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/13/elon-mu ... llion.html
 

I don't understand what the issue is.
Are the LIBERAL FASCISTS afraid that Musk WILL MAKE TWITTER RESPECT FREEDOM OF SPEECH...?


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:57 pm

No...it isn't. 

GW was citing from a respondent's motion.

That does NOT make them facts.

You're a **** idiot.

I’m all good.  You’ll get over it Duplex.  

Nrasobphobia » 04 Oct 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 12:56 pm

He can't take his losses like the ****** he is.

He is diverting, reframing and lying about a discussion to run from current discussions.  He’s a ******.  Always was since boyhood and still is one as a senior citizen.

Huey » 04 Oct 2022, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Oct 2022, 1:04 pm

I’m all good.  You’ll get over it Duplex.

Condex, idiot.