Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:20 pm

No...I voted against him.

you say girls feelings don't matter. you devalue them

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:20 pm

No...I voted against him.

say why boys  should compete against girls in girls sports.

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 4:42 pm

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 2:35 pm

Cool.  I accept your surrender.

Oh, by the way, you have just proven that your **** is based on appearance.  I have been counting on the fact you were not informed enough to know the Ruger Mini is based on the M 14.  The mini is a scaled down version of the weapon designed to **** kill people, which, most firearms are designed for.  

Have a nice day, Mr Vegetable. I'm out.  Gotta rehab workout to do.  Then maybe some I Target work

Apparently by directly and unambiguously contradicting it while obliging you to run from a relevant question. 

You're a **** idiot.
 

 

Wehn you start answering question's on a one for one basis AND stop editing quotes you reply to your questions will be answered as I have proven on numerous occasions.  Keep lying, Lll Man.  

Until then you may do as the rest of do. Make your points WITHOUT questions....oops, this is embarrassing....my bad, you not capable of doing so.  You need someone to do your work for you, Princess.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:01 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:01 am

Wehn you start answering 

That's not the problem, Coward.

jerrab » 09 Aug 2025, 1:47 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 1:47 am

say why boys  should compete against girls in girls sports.

Say why you think a rapist felon in the WH is a "solution"

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:56 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:01 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:01 am

Wehn you start answering 

That's not the problem, Coward.

 

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

Glad I found this thread.

Your opinion:

1.  A firearm that is of a wood stock, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, is perfectly fine for civilian use.

2. A firearm that has exterior pieces that make it look military, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, should be banned because of appearance.

Game.  Set.  Match, Sir.  Spend more time making a case and less demanding answers to stupid questions.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

Glad I found this thread.

Your opinion:

1.  A firearm that is of a wood stock, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, is perfectly fine for civilian use.

2. A firearm that has exterior pieces that make it look military, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, should be banned because of appearance.

Game.  Set.  Match, Sir.  Spend more time making a case and less demanding answers to stupid questions.

Elon can create his own country and have his own military.  It's a free world if you got the capital. He has millions of kids.
 

Johnny » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 11:51 pm

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

Glad I found this thread.

Your opinion:

1.  A firearm that is of a wood stock, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, is perfectly fine for civilian use.

2. A firearm that has exterior pieces that make it look military, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, should be banned because of appearance.

Game.  Set.  Match, Sir.  Spend more time making a case and less demanding answers to stupid questions.

Elon can create his own country and have his own military.  It's a free world if you got the capital.

 

Noted.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

 

This firearm argument is over.

It was over the first time I posted.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument

And your "factual, coherent" argument is?

 

I have proven, without questions,

You have asserted, without any evidence...

that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

you would have to post my words to that effect.

You can't. 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:36 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

This firearm argument is over.

It was over the first time I posted.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument

And your "factual, coherent" argument is?

 

I have proven, without questions,

You have asserted, without any evidence...

that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

you would have to post my words to that effect.

You can't. 
 

 

Actually, I posted that long before you did. Hell, you didn't even save the link in your file.  ****, dude, you never read the entire link. 

The rest of your post is not worth reading.  Have a nice day.
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:39 am

Actually, I posted that long before you did. Hell, you didn't even save the link in your file.  ****, dude, you never read the entire link. 

The rest of your post is not worth reading.  Have a nice day.

Address the FACTS, Tiny..

One of which is 

YOU LOST.
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

Glad I found this thread.

Your opinion:

1.  A firearm that is of a wood stock, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, is perfectly fine for civilian use.

2. A firearm that has exterior pieces that make it look military, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, should be banned because of appearance.

Game.  Set.  Match, Sir.  Spend more time making a case and less demanding answers to stupid questions.

For some reason my "opinion", offered at length, doesn’t include A SINGLE WORD of mine.

Not one.


 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:56 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:29 am

LMAO!!  Says the anonymous Keyboard Komando.

This firearm argument is over.  You are unable to post a factual, coherent argument.  I have proven, without questions, that your fear, loathing and penchant for a ban is based on appearance of the weapon.

Glad I found this thread.

Your opinion:

1.  A firearm that is of a wood stock, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, is perfectly fine for civilian use.

2. A firearm that has exterior pieces that make it look military, that fires 5.56 NATO, (a round optimized for combat) that is capable of using a high capacity magazine, that shoots one round per trigger pull, and fires a round at over 3200 Fps, should be banned because of appearance.

Game.  Set.  Match, Sir.  Spend more time making a case and less demanding answers to stupid questions.

For some reason my "opinion", offered at length, doesn’t include A SINGLE WORD of mine.

Not one.


 

 

I have already posted them.  

Take your L ignorant one.  This subject is not in your wheelhouse. Did you ever go to that local gun shop I inked for you so you can get educated on the subject?  Go argue with them.  See how it turns out.

You won't.  Because you know you are wrong.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:59 am

I have already posted them.  

Take your L ignorant one.  This subject is not in your wheelhouse. Did you ever go to that local gun shop I inked for you so you can get educated on the subject?  Go argue with them.  See how it turns out.

You won't.  Because you know you are wrong.

I have already posted them.  

No, lying little Tiny...you've posted my words which directly contradict you.

Take your L ignorant one.  This subject is not in your wheelhouse

This subject?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Looks like I striped it.

Did you ever go to that local gun shop I inked for you so you can get educated on the subject?  

I can read...

You?

Not so much.

This is why you need people to tell you what to think.

Go argue with them.  See how it turns out. You won't.  Because you know you are wrong.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2022, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2022, 6:37 am

Isn't that great.

2 Sticks KNOWS his kid is warped, yet facilitates his possession of high powered weaponry.

2 Sticks is a steaming pile of ****.
 

Between actions and reactions being equal within life balancing forward per hearts bating daily here, there is decisions to be made between actual evolving one at a time and factual social interpretation of tomorrows midnight to noon, dawn to dusk, every rotation each reproduction is alive now.

Evolving changes everything left positioned as a sole position of ancestral lineages conceived so far per cycle of life populating time now. Reasonable doubt defended by rule of law enforces tyranny by people wishing life wasn't self evident time alive eternally separated per personal heart beating now.

Is is a series parallel compounding results scenario of equally adapting since displaced a fertilize cell into a specific ancestral lineage and generation gap currently alive native to this universal location evolving as specifically behaving since birth.

Personal responsibility of each brain to recognize one's own time limitations adapting in plain sight. Live within one's means, not meaning of philosophical possibilities noon to midnight end of each of the relative time logistics of 7 figurative days of the week, 365.2422 rotations a revolution around the star, perpetually balancing 3rd planet from the sun never same total sum evolved twice.

Rule of 72 in economic theories works per chromosomes in each ancestral lineage in inverting proportions going forward. Chromosomes produce half life reproductions regardless asexual, male, female body types in this atmosphere's native populations between plant or animal kingdoms, predator or prey ancestral lineages, already covered sole results of added generation gaps so far that explains any form of life native to this universal location up to this rotation of the planet.

Hell of a system of instinctive accountability separate from intellectual minds directing the future 12 hours a day with the other 12 hours people punishing anyone form not complying with anything is possible narratives if everyone agrees to never accept now is eternity.

Self deception is the original sin within the history of context directing content of human behavior in every society currently here.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:00 am

Say why you think a rapist felon in the WH is a "solution"

the aftermath of running a candidate who was unelectable.

politics is candidates who will get the most votes so candidates try to appeal to everyone.

biden/harris only appealed to their supporters so trump  won.

 

jerra » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 11:55 pm

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:00 am

Say why you think a rapist felon in the WH is a "solution"

the aftermath of running a candidate who was unelectable.

politics is candidates who will get the most votes so candidates try to appeal to everyone.

biden/harris only appealed to their supporters so trump  won.

 

 

Oh, policy had NOTHING to do with it.  LMAO!  Start diverting

jerrab » 09 Aug 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:01 am

the aftermath of running a candidate who was unelectable.

politics is candidates who will get the most votes so candidates try to appeal to everyone.

biden/harris only appealed to their supporters so trump  won.

If a felony conviction and rape judgement don't render a candidate unelectable......wait.....it hasn't....

Whoooooppeeee!

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:04 am

Oh, policy had NOTHING to do with it.  LMAO!  Start diverting

it didn't.

thank you for diverting.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:04 am

Oh, policy had NOTHING to do with it.  LMAO!  Start diverting

it didn't.

thank you for diverting.

 

I didn't, Mr. Troll.

And opinins like that **** is why your lefties are gonna have a difficult time.