Liberal Forum

ConservativeWave » 10 Jul 2022, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 10:16 pm

YOU are correct... The polls were OUT of CONTROL in 2020... and THAT led to a President Joe Biden...  and THAT needs to be corrected BEFORE 2024 !

Hopefully other states will take a page out of Wisconsin's playbook.

ConservativeWave » 10 Jul 2022, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 10:12 pm

THAT was BEFORE THOUSANDS of polling stations, open a ALL HOURS of the night, were accepting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of ILLEGAL votes, LONG after normal polls has closed... and BASTARDIZED our election process... en route to a BULL **** President, named Joe Biden !!

Yep...that's what happened.

MAGAdreaming » 10 Jul 2022, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 10:17 pm

Legislating from the bench again. Republican used to hate this. Till they start doing it.

If that's really what you believe based on the SC decision on Roe, then it's really quite simple.  Show us where the word abortion exists anywhere in the US Constitution.  And when you realize it's not there, simply explain how it is that the 10th Amendment doesn't apply.  That is NOT "legislating from the bench" which is EXACTLY what the original court did by claiming they found a God-given right (the meaning of inalienable rights) that's was meant to apply to abortion in the Bill of Rights.

THAT is the perfect example of what "legislating from the bench" refers to, you moron!
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am

If that's really what you believe based on the SC decision on Roe, then it's really quite simple.  Show us where the word abortion exists anywhere in the US Constitution.  And when you realize it's not there, simply explain how it is that the 10th Amendment doesn't apply.  That is NOT "legislating from the bench" which is EXACTLY what the original court did by claiming they found a God-given right (the meaning of inalienable rights) that's was meant to apply to abortion in the Bill of Rights.

THAT is the perfect example of what "legislating from the bench" refers to, you moron!

I've even heard some leftist pundits say Roe was based on thin legal Constitutional ice. The dems don't care about Roe...what they want is an emotional divisive issue to excite their base, what's left of it.

roadkill » 11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:05 am

I've even heard some leftist pundits say Roe was based on thin legal Constitutional ice. The dems don't care about Roe...what they want is an emotional divisive issue to excite their base, what's left of it.

It always was, and it was not just the anti-abortion side that stated it!  The most radical liberal ever on the SC, Ruth "Buzzy" Ginsburg said so! 

Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Roe v. Wade wasn’t good law
by  Erin Elmore and Thane Rosenbaum  Newsmax June 24, 2022 
https://youtu.be/JzuuWfxNq94

 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:17 am

It always was, and it was not just the anti-abortion side that stated it!  The most radical liberal ever on the SC, Ruth "Buzzy" Ginsburg said so!

Good video...and spot on. Leave it in the states where it belongs.

roadkill » 11 Jul 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 8:41 am

Good video...and spot on. Leave it in the states where it belongs.

Exactly!  This re-established the inalienable right for the wishes of the State and it's People to choose the policies THEY want in THEIR state WITHOUT interference from an all-powerful Federal government.  That is precisely why the 10th Amendment was added to our Bill of Rights.
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:01 am

Exactly!  This re-established the inalienable right for the wishes of the State and it's People to choose the policies THEY want in THEIR state WITHOUT interference from an all-powerful Federal government.  That is precisely why the 10th Amendment was added to our Bill of Rights.

Yep...check out my new post on the J6 thread.

roadkill » 11 Jul 2022, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:06 am

Yep...check out my new post on the J6 thread.

Already did.  It's brilliant!
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:16 am

Already did.  It's brilliant!

Bv's not happy, but he's trying to hide it.     

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 7:48 am

If that's really what you believe based on the SC decision on Roe, then it's really quite simple.  Show us where the word abortion exists anywhere in the US Constitution.  And when you realize it's not there, simply explain how it is that the 10th Amendment doesn't apply.  That is NOT "legislating from the bench" which is EXACTLY what the original court did by claiming they found a God-given right (the meaning of inalienable rights) that's was meant to apply to abortion in the Bill of Rights.

THAT is the perfect example of what "legislating from the bench" refers to, you moron!

13th amendment outlawed slavery.  Forced birth is enslavement.
 

ScottMon » 11 Jul 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:45 am

13th amendment outlawed slavery.  Forced birth is enslavement.

Yeah?  Show me where you found that ridiculously absurd definition, you fool!
 

roadkill » 11 Jul 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 9:24 am

Bv's not happy, but he's trying to hide it.   

Well, I guess we'll just have to muddle along without his happiness!

I can't tell you how bad I feel about it!     


 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:49 am

Yeah?  Show me where you found that ridiculously absurd definition, you fool!

en·slave·ment
[enˈslāvmənt]

1. the action of making someone a slave; subjugation:

Forcing a woman to give birth against her will is subjugation.
 
 
 

ScottMon » 11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am

en·slave·ment
[enˈslāvmənt]

1. the action of making someone a slave; subjugation:

Forcing a woman to give birth against her will is subjugation.

No women are being forced to give birth you **** liar.
It seems that you Gays must lie to make a point..but you only fool yourselves.

A NORMAL person who respects the truth would say that SOME women are forced to travel FURTHER to get an abortion now.
 

ScottMon » 11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am

en·slave·ment
[enˈslāvmənt]

1. the action of making someone a slave; subjugation:

Forcing a woman to give birth against her will is subjugation.

****!  With the exception of the very rare case where rape is involved, women CHOOSE to have sex WHEN THEY KNOW THE POTENTIAL FOR PREGNANCY EXISTS!  And when the inevitable occurs, another life is involved THAT THEY MAY NOT MURDER ACCORDING TO THEIR WHIM!

Now show me the definition of "subjugation" that states that pregnancy is a form of that!
You leftist idiots DO NOT get to make up your own definitions at will!

 
 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 11:33 am

****!  With the exception of the very rare case where rape is involved, women CHOOSE to have sex WHEN THEY KNOW THE POTENTIAL FOR PREGNANCY EXISTS!  And when the inevitable occurs, another life is involved THAT THEY MAY NOT MURDER ACCORDING TO THEIR WHIM!

Now show me the definition of "subjugation" that states that pregnancy is a form of that!
You leftist idiots DO NOT get to make up your own definitions at will!

Rape not so rare.  1 out of 4 women are sexually assaulted.   And most pregnancies are terminated in the 1st term as per their choice.  To force them to otherwise is slavery.
 

ScottMon » 11 Jul 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 12:27 pm

Rape not so rare.  1 out of 4 women are sexually assaulted.   And most pregnancies are terminated in the 1st term as per their choice.  To force them to otherwise is slavery.

A little less than 5% of rapes result in a pregnancy.

Besides, women everywhere still have the choice to get an abortion.
 

Zeets2 » 11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2022, 10:52 am

Well, I guess we'll just have to muddle along without his happiness!

I can't tell you how bad I feel about it!   

I know...I'm getting all misty eyed.      

roadkill » 10 Jul 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2022, 12:56 pm

Guns are fine in the hands of law abiding people.

Places like Illinois needs to take the red flag laws more seriously.

It's the guns getting to criminals that I want to stop. I dont want criminals with guns and will work to have only law abiding persons with firearms.