razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Is filibuster in the Constitution?
Defenders call the filibuster "The Soul of the Senate." It is not part of the US Constitution.
Abolish the filibuster ...........
I found this one for the B.See troll but you can use it too....razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ What is the Senate filibuster, and what would it take to ...https://www.brookings.edu › policy2020 › votervital
Sep 9, 2020 — The most straightforward way to eliminate the filibuster would be to formally change the text of Senate Rule 22, the cloture rule that requires ...
Why Democrats Should Abolish the Filibuster - The Atlantich
ttps://www.theatlantic.com › archive › 2021/09 › filib...
Sep 30, 2021 — In just the past week, the casualty count of Democratic priorities doomed by the filibuster has mounted; both police and immigration reform now ...
Why the Senate Should Abolish the Filibuster - Bloomberg Law
https://news.bloomberglaw.com › us-law-week › why-t...
Feb 22, 2021 — Then in 2017, McConnell abolished the filibuster as applied to Supreme Court nominees. There is no political compromise anymore, and the ...
Eliminating the Filibuster | Indivisible
https://indivisible.org › resource › congress-101-filibuster
Eliminating the filibuster is simple. All it takes to eliminate the filibuster is a simple majority vote in the Senate — and this can be done at any time.

Go ahead, the Dems won’t be in power forever.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Is filibuster in the Constitution?
Defenders call the filibuster "The Soul of the Senate." It is not part of the US Constitution.
Abolish the filibuster ...........
The filibuster is a Senate rule, these rules are written by the senate, get rid of the filibuster now and you’ll be crying next January when the Dems don’t have it to use.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ There are still a small number of republicans who would I believe support this in addition to supporting new Women's Choice legislation ..........
So you're saying Leader Scummer and Stink Finger are both lying when they say there aren't the votes to get rid of the filibuster.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ There are still a small number of republicans who would I believe support this in addition to supporting new Women's Choice legislation ..........
They say you're full of ****.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑ There are still a small number of republicans who would I believe support this in addition to supporting new Women's Choice legislation ..........
Dem's could pass legislation if they wouldn't constantly over-reach.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ What is the Senate filibuster, and what would it take to ...https://www.brookings.edu › policy2020 › votervital
Sep 9, 2020 — The most straightforward way to eliminate the filibuster would be to formally change the text of Senate Rule 22, the cloture rule that requires ...
Why Democrats Should Abolish the Filibuster - The Atlantich
ttps://www.theatlantic.com › archive › 2021/09 › filib...
Sep 30, 2021 — In just the past week, the casualty count of Democratic priorities doomed by the filibuster has mounted; both police and immigration reform now ...
Why the Senate Should Abolish the Filibuster - Bloomberg Law
https://news.bloomberglaw.com › us-law-week › why-t...
Feb 22, 2021 — Then in 2017, McConnell abolished the filibuster as applied to Supreme Court nominees. There is no political compromise anymore, and the ...
Eliminating the Filibuster | Indivisible
https://indivisible.org › resource › congress-101-filibuster
Eliminating the filibuster is simple. All it takes to eliminate the filibuster is a simple majority vote in the Senate — and this can be done at any time.
What would Teddy Kennedy say...?razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Is filibuster in the Constitution?
Defenders call the filibuster "The Soul of the Senate." It is not part of the US Constitution.
Abolish the filibuster ...........
**** dem twats will want it back after one election cycle.ConsRule » 11 Jul 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ Dims have control of the Senate. All Leader Scummer needs to do is convince Manchin and Sinema to vote with him. Don't like the filibuster...blame it on Scummer.
No the filibuster isn't in the constitution.razoo » 11 Jul 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Is filibuster in the Constitution?
Defenders call the filibuster "The Soul of the Senate." It is not part of the US Constitution.
Abolish the filibuster ...........
seriously.. i really dont understand exactly what a filibuster is..FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Is bribing and/or extorting politicians in the Constitution?
does the constitution even **** matter?? Where is my freedome of association,, buddy??
you are exhibiting a classic example of falling for **** party politics echo chamber issues while remaining totally blind to REAL issues..
Politics is designed to ne that way.. I wrote about it here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=56458
It Is simply a way to delay the passing of a bill for so long that it just runs out of time for consideration. The house has to move on to another topic.sootedupCyndi » 11 Jul 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ seriously.. i really dont understand exactly what a filibuster is..
i asked the guys the other day... 'we cant explain it to you cyndi.. thats a hard question."
to me it is some asshole on the senate floor talking for hours. and if i am right? whats the purpose of that?
A fibuster used to be where you stood and talked for hours and hours to stop the bill from passing till you quit speaking.sootedupCyndi » 11 Jul 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ seriously.. i really dont understand exactly what a filibuster is..
i asked the guys the other day... 'we cant explain it to you cyndi.. thats a hard question."
to me it is some asshole on the senate floor talking for hours. and if i am right? whats the purpose of that?
That Libtard doesn't have enough forward thinking ability to understand what you just told it.
Oh thank you..FOS » 11 Jul 2022, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ true? Is simply a way to delay the passing of a bill for so long that it just runs out of time for consideration. The house has to move on to another topic.
This has been bugging me. thanks I've really been asking.MAGAdreaming » 11 Jul 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑ A fibuster used to be where you stood and talked for hours and hours to stop the bill from passing till you quit speaking.
They changed the rules of the filibuster some years ago to where you don't have to do that and it makes your bill have to get 60 votes to pass. Basically it's a tool for the minority to block a bill by not have a simple majority to pass.